Prediction Market Giants Clash as Competition Between Kalshi and Polymarket Heats Up

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-02Actualizado a 2026-04-02

Resumen

The competition between US-based prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket has intensified, with both companies exchanging sharp public criticisms. Kalshi, which is regulated by the CFTC, launched an ad campaign in Washington, D.C., with slogans such as "We don’t do death markets," directly targeting Polymarket’s offshore operations and its controversial contracts related to military conflicts and sensitive events. Kalshi accused Polymarket of being "irresponsible, dangerous, and non-compliant," while Polymarket responded by calling for fact-based discussions and emphasizing its commitment to market integrity. The dispute highlights fundamental differences in their regulatory approaches and comes amid growing scrutiny over insider trading and ethical concerns in the prediction market industry, which has seen combined weekly volumes nearing $6 billion.

Written by: Yash Roy, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

This is an advertisement placed by the American prediction market platform Kalshi at a Washington bus stop in March. With the slogan 'We Don't Do Death Markets,' it emphasizes its own federally regulated compliance to attack its competitor Polymarket's unregulated overseas operations and sensitive contracts related to military conflicts. Photographer: Daniel Hoyle / Bloomberg

As competition in the prediction market industry intensifies and this emerging field faces strict regulatory scrutiny in Washington, Kalshi and Polymarket are exchanging heavy accusations in a fierce confrontation.

The two platforms have frequently clashed before, but recent conflicts have escalated completely — Kalshi launched a highly targeted advertising campaign, and its employees have publicly criticized Polymarket, with the rhetoric from both sides becoming increasingly heated.

Benjamin Freeman, who is responsible for political and election markets at Kalshi, posted on social media on Monday, stating: 'Polymarket's irresponsible, dangerous, and allegedly违规的行为 (non-compliant behavior) is threatening the survival of legitimate prediction markets in the United States.'

This accusation quickly sparked a fierce war of words between the two companies.

Polymarket responded in a statement: 'We welcome competition but believe discussions should be based on facts. Misleading the public only harms the entire industry and its participants.'

Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana directly retorted: 'It's laughable to hear this from a company whose vast majority of trading volume is on an unregulated overseas platform, with rules that even allow for 'death markets'.'

(Note: Death Markets is a general term in the prediction market industry for trading contracts that directly/indirectly bet on events related to death, military conflicts, assassinations, etc., also known as 'assassination markets.')

This internal strife erupts at a critical time when Polymarket and Kalshi are vying for the leading position in the rapidly growing prediction market industry. This industry provides Americans with a new way to bet on various events, from sports games to election outcomes. According to data compiled by a user on Dune Analytics, the two startups have recently set new records in weekly trading volume, with their combined nominal trading volume recently approaching $6 billion.

Prediction Market Trading Volume Reaches Billions

Weekly nominal trading volume of Polymarket and Kalshi. Note: Data is for the week ending March 9th. Source: @datadashboards on Dune Analytics

The core of the dispute lies in the fundamental differences in the establishment models and operating rules of the trading platforms. The Kalshi platform is headquartered in the United States and is regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); Polymarket's main trading platform is based overseas.

Polymarket leverages its overseas operational advantage to list contracts related to military conflicts, including those involving Iran. Kalshi directly states that such products are both unethical and illegal.

One of Kalshi's advertisements bluntly states: 'We Don't Do Death Markets.'

Earlier this week, this set of marketing ads from Kalshi, in the form of a 'platform rules list,' began appearing at bus stops and subway stations in Washington.

One of them reads: 'Rule 1: We ban insider trading because Kalshi is a federally regulated U.S. exchange.' In the eyes of industry observers, the subtext of this statement is obvious: Polymarket's main platform is not under the jurisdiction of U.S. regulators.

'BETS OFF Act' signage, Representative Greg Casar and Senator Chris Murphy speak at a press conference regarding the 'Betting on Events with Security and Federal Functions Off-Limits (BETS OFF) Act'. Photographer: Stephanie Reynolds / Bloomberg

Following allegations that insider information was used to improperly bet on U.S. military actions in Iran and Venezuela, Congress has turned its focus to the issue of insider trading in prediction markets. In response, Kalshi has taken a tougher stance, imposing fines, suspending trading, and other penalties on users it deems to have violated rules; Polymarket has been relatively permissive, though with increased regulatory attention, the platform recently announced its own insider trading rules.

Kalshi spokesperson Diana said: 'We want to make these significant differences clear. Many people in the market currently conflate Kalshi and Polymarket and confuse the different paths we have taken regarding regulatory compliance.'

In addition to its overseas main platform, Polymarket also has a U.S.-regulated platform, which is still in the testing phase. The company stated in a declaration that both platforms enforce 'the same strict market integrity standards, including prohibitions on insider trading and market manipulation, active monitoring of trading, and ongoing communication and cooperation with regulators and law enforcement agencies.'

A trade on the Polymarket website regarding whether the Houthis will attack Israeli territory. Photographer: Gabby Jones / Bloomberg

Just a few months ago, Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara was still trying to ease tensions between the two rivals. In a social media post last October, she expressed hope that the industry could move beyond 'destructive infighting' and develop together.

Now, that vision seems largely shattered.

The conflict became even more difficult to reconcile after Kalshi advisor and former U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commissioner Brian Quintenz joined the fray. In response to reports that prosecutors are investigating insider trading, Brian Quintenz publicly hinted on social media this week that the investigation should focus on Polymarket. When contacted by Bloomberg News, he declined to comment further.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main point of contention between Kalshi and Polymarket?

AThe core dispute revolves around their operational models and regulatory compliance. Kalshi, a US-based platform regulated by the CFTC, criticizes Polymarket for its primarily offshore, unregulated main platform and for offering controversial 'death market' contracts related to military conflicts.

QWhat specific advertising campaign did Kalshi launch against Polymarket?

AKalshi launched a targeted ad campaign in Washington, D.C., bus and metro stations. One ad stated, 'We don't do death markets,' emphasizing its federal regulation and taking a direct shot at Polymarket's offshore operations and sensitive contracts.

QHow did Polymarket respond to the allegations from Kalshi?

APolymarket responded with a statement saying, 'We welcome competition, but believe discussions should be based on facts,' and argued that misleading the public harms the entire industry and its participants. They also stated that both their offshore and US-regulated platforms maintain the same strict market integrity standards.

QWhat recent legislative focus is mentioned in the article that impacts prediction markets?

AThe article mentions that Congress has turned its focus to the issue of insider trading in prediction markets, particularly following allegations that people used inside information to bet on U.S. military actions in Iran and Venezuela. This has led to the proposed 'BETS OFF Act'.

QWhat was the reported combined recent trading volume for Kalshi and Polymarket?

AAccording to user-compiled data on Dune Analytics, the two startups recently set new weekly trading volume records, with their combined nominal trading volume approaching $6 billion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHace 2 min(s)

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHace 2 min(s)

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

Trading

Spot