Prediction Market Competition Heats Up, Hyperliquid Enters the Fray with 'Outcomes'

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

Hyperliquid, a leading crypto derivatives exchange, has announced the test launch of "Outcomes," a new prediction market feature, causing its native token HYPE to surge over 10%. Unlike traditional prediction markets, Outcomes is designed with three core mechanisms: full collateralization (eliminating liquidation risk), non-linear settlement (enabling complex strategies similar to options), and native integration with Hyperliquid’s chain and margin system. This move positions Hyperliquid against established players like Polymarket (focused on social sentiment), Kalshi (compliant markets), and Coinbase (consumer-facing products). Hyperliquid aims to integrate prediction markets directly into its financial ecosystem, allowing users to combine derivatives and prediction positions within a unified margin account. With a highly efficient core team of 11 members generating over $1 billion in annualized revenue per person, Hyperliquid is expanding rapidly. While some analysts note that even capturing all of Polymarket’s volume would only add ~5% to Hyperliquid’s revenue, the platform’s current $7 billion valuation is considered undervalued compared to Polymarket’s $10 billion valuation. Outcomes is seen as a key step in building a comprehensive on-chain Wall Street, though it remains in testnet with no mainnet release date announced.

Original Author: Seed.eth, Bitpush News

Hyperliquid, firmly holding the top spot in the crypto derivatives track, is now attempting to extend its reach into another trillion-dollar market on the brink of explosion: the prediction market.

Today, Hyperliquid officially announced the testing of a new feature called 'Outcomes'. This news directly ignited excitement in the secondary market, with its native token HYPE recording a gain of over 10% within 24 hours, breaking through the $30 mark.

At a time when Polymarket dominates on-chain traffic and Kalshi, in partnership with Coinbase, captures the compliant market, Hyperliquid's entry is far from simple 'bandwagoning'. Instead, it leverages the absolute advantage of its native underlying performance to redefine the rules of the game.

What is Outcomes

According to the official HIP-4 proposal, Outcomes (Result Contracts) are not a simple betting interface. Their design hinges on the following three core logics:

1. Full Collateralization, No Liquidation Risk

Unlike leveraged perpetual contracts, Outcomes adhere to the principle of 'you can only do as much as your money allows'. It uses full collateralization and settles within a fixed range. This means that no matter how the market fluctuates, as long as the settlement date hasn't arrived, a trader's position will not face forced liquidation, fundamentally removing the risk of being liquidated.

2. Non-linear Settlement, Greater Strategic Space

Outcomes introduces a non-linear settlement mechanism. For traders, this is equivalent to gaining a flexibility close to that of options. You can use it to build more complex hedging instruments, no longer limited to simple binary 'yes' or 'no' games, thereby opening up greater space for risk management and strategic combinations.

3. Native Integration, Liquidity Connectivity

Outcomes will be deeply integrated into HyperCore, Hyperliquid's underlying chain, and priced in its native stablecoin USDH. More importantly, it will share cross-margin with the platform's existing spot and perpetual contracts. This means users can seamlessly connect multiple trading strategies within a single margin account, truly achieving interoperability and reuse of liquidity.

Multi-Party Fragmentation: Who is the Final Form of the Prediction Market?

The current prediction market is at its '1995 browser war' moment, forming four distinct business paths:

  • Polymarket sells 'opinions'; it's a barometer of social trends.
  • Kalshi sells 'compliance'; it attracts US domestic capital seeking to avoid legal risks.
  • Coinbase is about 'dimensionality reduction attack', turning the prediction market into a mass consumer product through an in-app feature.
  • Hyperliquid's logic is the most hardcore: it doesn't require you to click Yes or No on a webpage; it wants you to buy an Outcomes contract hedging 'non-farm payroll data exceeding expectations' while shorting BTC.

Right now, the community is most focused on the synergistic effect between HIP-3 (Permissionless Listing) and HIP-4 (Outcomes).

Under this architecture, Hyperliquid's evolution path is clear: first, official deployment of 'Canonical Markets' based on objective data sources, such as interest rates and macroeconomic indicators; followed by enabling permissionless deployment.

Behind this strategy is Hyperliquid's legendary team advantage. It's hard to imagine that this behemoth, with annualized revenue exceeding $1.1 billion and trading volume rivaling top-tier CEXs, is supported by a core team of only about 11 people. This 'special forces' team, composed of Harvard, MIT elites, and top quantitative hedge fund professionals, has created an astonishing efficiency of over $100 million in annualized revenue per capita. Precisely because the team is extremely lean with short decision-making paths, Hyperliquid can iterate rapidly.

A senior DeFi observer commented: 'Coinbase's entry validates the business model, but it is still centralized. Hyperliquid's Outcomes is challenging a proposition: the endgame of prediction markets does not lie in social media, but in financialization. When trading prediction outcomes becomes as smooth as buying and selling stocks, and can share margin with futures, the imagination space for on-chain finance truly opens up.'

Is HYPE Severely Undervalued?

As the crypto options market matures, the Open Interest (OI) in Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market has surged to $1 billion, and the platform's 24-hour trading volume has skyrocketed to $4.8 billion, hitting a new all-time high.

Regarding this move, Blockworks researcher Shaunda Devens believes it further supports Hyperliquid's valuation upside.

Devens pointed out that even if HIP-4 captured 100% of Polymarket's trading volume, its contribution to Hyperliquid's revenue would only be about 5%.

This data seems surprising at first glance, but the underlying logic is: the perpetual contracts market (including the long-tail assets brought by HIP-3) is extremely large. Devens believes that Hyperliquid's current valuation of approximately $7 billion is clearly in a state of significant undervaluation compared to Polymarket's latest round valuation of $10 billion (based on 2025 funding data). The launch of Outcomes is primarily about supplementing a key piece of its full-category financial matrix.

Despite the high market sentiment, it is important to note that Outcomes is currently still in the testnet phase, and a specific timeline for the mainnet launch has not been announced yet. However, with the explosion of the HyperEVM ecosystem, future mainstream service providers like Kalshi or Crypto.com could, in theory, migrate to run on the Hyperliquid chain using the HIP-4 protocol.

In summary, the prediction market is ushering in its best era. In the US, thanks to the advancement of regulatory clarity, the cooperation between Kalshi and Coinbase has already made prediction markets available in all 50 states; similarly strong growth momentum is also seen in the EU and Asia. For Hyperliquid, Outcomes is not a simple 'gambling game'; it is an indispensable piece of the puzzle in building the 'on-chain Wall Street'.

Original link

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Hyperliquid's new feature called and what market is it targeting?

AHyperliquid's new feature is called 'Outcomes', and it is targeting the prediction market.

QWhat are the three core design principles of Hyperliquid's Outcomes feature?

AThe three core design principles are: 1. Full collateralization with no liquidation risk. 2. Non-linear settlement for greater strategic flexibility. 3. Native integration on HyperCore, sharing cross-margin with existing spot and perpetual contracts.

QHow did the announcement of Outcomes affect the price of the HYPE token?

AThe announcement caused the HYPE token to surge over 10% in 24 hours, pushing its price above $30.

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's approach to the prediction market differ from competitors like Polymarket and Kalshi?

AHyperliquid's approach is not a simple gambling interface; it leverages its native chain's performance to create a financialized product that integrates seamlessly with other derivatives, allowing for complex hedging strategies. This contrasts with Polymarket, which focuses on social sentiment, and Kalshi, which focuses on regulatory compliance.

QWhat was a key observation from Blockworks researcher Shaunda Devens regarding Hyperliquid's valuation after the Outcomes announcement?

AShaunda Devens observed that Hyperliquid's ~$7 billion valuation is significantly undervalued compared to Polymarket's latest $10 billion valuation, even if Outcomes captured 100% of Polymarket's volume, as the perpetuals market is vastly larger and is Hyperliquid's primary revenue driver.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片