Police Expose Pseudo-Crypto Academy: Scammers Cheated Nearly a Thousand Ukrainians Out of $1.1 Million

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-28Actualizado a 2026-07-28

Resumen

Ukrainian police have exposed a fraudulent organization that posed as a "Ukrainian Financial Academy" offering cryptocurrency investment courses, defrauding nearly a thousand citizens of over $1.1 million. The scam, advertised on Facebook and Instagram, targeted vulnerable individuals, including pensioners and people with severe illnesses, who lost savings intended for medical treatment or housing. After victims expressed interest, fraudsters gained their trust, convinced them to transfer money to controlled accounts, and displayed fake profits on a bogus platform. Some were allowed small withdrawals to encourage larger investments. When victims tried to recover funds, their accounts were blocked, and they were pressured for additional payments under false pretenses. In one case, a cancer patient lost approximately 500,000 hryvnias meant for treatment. Organizers also coerced victims into taking loans or recruiting others. Police conducted searches in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions, detaining four key suspects. They face charges of large-scale fraud as part of a criminal organization, with possible sentences of up to 12 years in prison and asset confiscation.

The National Police of Ukraine reported the exposure of a criminal organization that, under the guise of training in cryptocurrency investments, deceived nearly a thousand citizens out of more than $1.1 million. Among the victims were pensioners, people with disabilities, and seriously ill individuals who lost funds saved for treatment or housing purchases.

Scammers Operated Under the Guise of a Crypto Academy

According to law enforcement, the defendants presented themselves as employees of the so-called "Ukrainian Financial Academy" and advertised courses on cryptocurrency investing through Facebook and Instagram.

After potential clients submitted applications, managers would assess their financial situation and gain their trust. Then, so-called traders would convince the victims to transfer money to controlled bank accounts and crypto wallets.

To create the illusion of successful investments, a fictitious platform displayed supposedly generated profits. In some cases, clients were even allowed to withdraw a small amount to encourage them to invest more funds.

When people tried to get their money back, access to their accounts was blocked, and they were asked for new payments—allegedly for fees or to replenish a reserve fund—to "unblock" them.

Victims Were Forced to Take Out Loans

According to police information, the scheme participants deliberately targeted people in difficult financial or life situations.

In particular, one of the victims, who was undergoing treatment for cancer, transferred about 500,000 UAH intended for treatment to the scammers. Other victims were persuaded to take out loans or invest family savings set aside for housing purchases.

Furthermore, the organizers used the victims themselves to find new targets. One client was convinced to record a positive video testimonial about the platform, which was later used in advertising materials.

According to the investigation, law enforcement identified 988 unique accounts that may belong to victims. The total amount of damage is estimated at approximately $1.11 million.

Organizers Detained

Investigators from the Main Investigative Department of the National Police, together with cyber police, conducted dozens of searches in the Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions and detained four key participants of the criminal organization.

According to the investigation's version, two co-organizers coordinated the scheme's activities, selected participants, distributed roles and received funds, while others were responsible for advertising and communicating with potential victims.

The defendants were notified of suspicion under Part 4, 5 of Article 190 and Part 1, 2 of Article 255 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (fraud on an especially large scale committed by a criminal organization). The court has already ordered all suspects to be held in custody as a preventive measure. If found guilty, they face up to 12 years of imprisonment with confiscation of property.

Recall that in May 2025, we reported that Ukrainian police "earned" $2.2 million from kidnapping crypto businessmen.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the name of the fake academy used by the fraudsters to scam people?

AThe fraudsters operated under the name "Ukrainian Financial Academy."

QHow did the scam work to trick victims into investing more money?

AThe scam displayed fake profits on a phony platform and sometimes allowed victims to withdraw a small amount, which created an illusion of success and encouraged them to invest even more.

QWhat types of people were specifically targeted by this criminal scheme?

AThe organizers specifically targeted people in difficult financial or life situations, including pensioners, people with disabilities, and severely ill individuals.

QWhat potential punishment do the detained organizers face if proven guilty?

AIf proven guilty, the organizers face up to 12 years of imprisonment with confiscation of property.

QApproximately how many victims and what total amount of money are involved in this scam according to the investigation?

AThe investigation identified 988 potential victim accounts, with the total estimated damage being approximately $1.11 million.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum's 11th Year: Why Is This Year Particularly Crucial?

Ethereum's 11th year proved pivotal, marked by a dual evolution in its technical roadmap and organizational structure. The year saw the completion of the Fusaka upgrade, introducing PeerDAS to make data availability sampling more efficient and laying groundwork for future L2 scaling. This was followed by a significant reorganization of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). The EF downsized, redefining its core mandate around user sovereignty and CROPS principles, while spinning off key functions. Independent entities like Ethlabs (non-profit R&D), Ethereum Institutional (institutional onboarding), and EthSystems (institutional privacy solutions) now operate separately. Technologically, the community debated a bold, long-term vision outlined in Justin Drake's "Lean Ethereum" proposal and the collaborative "Strawmap." These point toward a "third major iteration" for Ethereum, targeting goals like faster finality (~1 second), gigagas-scale L1 throughput, teragas-scale L2 capacity, post-quantum cryptography, and protocol-level privacy. Data underscores Ethereum's dominant position: its L1 still holds roughly half of all stablecoin value, leads in tokenized Real-World Assets (RWA), and commands over 55% of total DeFi TVL. While L2s now handle over 10x more transactions than the mainnet, high-value assets remain concentrated on L1. The launch of Robinhood Chain, an EVM-compatible L2 for stock tokens, signals growing institutional adoption. The immediate roadmap includes the Glamsterdam upgrade (featuring ePBS for in-protocol proposer-builder separation and Block Access Lists for parallelism), potentially followed by Hegotá focusing on anti-censorship via FOCIL. In summary, Ethereum's 11th year was defined by setting ambitious technical foundations for its next decade and restructuring its core development ecosystem to be more modular and sustainable, all while maintaining its role as the leading settlement layer for decentralized finance and assets.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Ethereum's 11th Year: Why Is This Year Particularly Crucial?

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Notable Forecast from an Analytical Company Regarding Bitcoin (BTC): After This Date, a New Bull Season Could Begin!

Bitcoin continues to trade sideways around $64,000 amid ongoing uncertainty regarding U.S. monetary policy and geopolitical risks in the Middle East. As BTC struggles for direction, an analyst predicts the next major uptrend could commence after the U.S. midterm elections. João Wedson, founder and CEO of crypto analytics firm Alphractal, revisited the connection between Bitcoin's price movements and the U.S. election calendar in his latest analysis. Wedson claims that analyzing past market cycles reveals similar patterns in Bitcoin's price behavior, particularly around U.S. midterm and presidential elections. Historically, Bitcoin has faced headwinds leading up to midterms but tends to recover once election-related uncertainty subsides. Based on historical data, Bitcoin entered bear markets roughly a year before past midterm elections, only to initiate prolonged bull markets after the elections concluded. In some cycles, price bottoms formed just days before the vote, while in others, the low occurred immediately after. The analyst also noted presidential elections have a distinct impact: Bitcoin experiences strong rallies each time a president wins re-election and approaches the peak of its main cycle shortly after the presidential inauguration. As an example, Wedson pointed to XRP, which began a sharp rise on the day Donald Trump won the 2024 election and reached a local peak on January 20, 2025, his inauguration day.

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

Notable Forecast from an Analytical Company Regarding Bitcoin (BTC): After This Date, a New Bull Season Could Begin!

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

Lummis: The CLARITY Act mechanism "is not working" as the Senate drags its feet

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis has argued that the current regulatory framework for digital assets is inadequate, harming industry, investors, and regulators alike. She is urgently pushing for the Senate to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633/CLARITY Act) before the August recess, warning the current momentum for the bill is a unique opportunity this decade. The legislation aims to divide oversight between the SEC and CFTC. Time is running out, as the Senate must act before its August 8th recess. Delays would push the debate to September, further squeezing the legislative calendar before the midterm elections. Forecasting platforms now estimate only a 30% chance of the bill becoming law in 2026, a sharp drop from over 80% in February. Passage requires 60 votes, meaning at least seven Democrats must join Republicans, a task complicated by Democratic opposition. Key objections from figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren center on concerns the bill could weaken oversight of decentralized finance (DeFi) and consumer protection, potentially endangering the financial system. Over 200 crypto industry organizations, including Coinbase and Ripple, are lobbying for a vote, arguing continued uncertainty drives innovation and jobs overseas. Lummis contends the bill's custody and disclosure rules are precisely the consumer protections needed to close existing loopholes. The bill's fate now hinges on whether Senate Majority Leader John Thune schedules a vote this week or delays it until the fall session, where it would face an even more constrained political environment.

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

Lummis: The CLARITY Act mechanism "is not working" as the Senate drags its feet

cryptonews.ruHace 19 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片