Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-20Actualizado a 2026-04-20

Resumen

Following a 10% plunge, oil prices surged over the weekend as geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated dramatically. The initial market optimism, driven by the strait’s brief reopening on Friday, quickly reversed on Saturday when Iran reinstated restrictions and fired on vessels, halting nearly all traffic. In response, oil contracts rose approximately 4.52%, while S&P futures fell nearly 0.8%. U.S. President Trump alternated between diplomatic gestures—sending an envoy for talks—and threats to destroy Iranian infrastructure if no deal was reached. Iran rejected further negotiations, fearing a U.S. attack before the midweek ceasefire deadline. This triggered another spike in oil, surpassing Saturday’s highs, and further pressured equity markets. Crypto-related stocks underperformed significantly. Market optimism is expected to be punished, and the week ahead hinges on whether Iran maintains its refusal to negotiate.

Friday's reopening of the critical Hormuz Strait waterway triggered widespread risk-on sentiment in the markets: U.S. stocks soared, crude oil prices plummeted, U.S. Treasury yields fell, as the belief spread that the worst was over and the disruption to global energy supplies had eased.

However, these moves may prove to be premature.

At 9:20 AM on the 18th (Saturday), reports broke that two oil tankers had been denied passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump immediately applied public pressure: if no deal was reached by Wednesday, the U.S. would continue blockading Iranian ports. At 16:00 that day, Iran announced the re-imposition of restrictions on the Strait and opened fire on vessels attempting to pass—two Indian ships turned back into the Persian Gulf after being shelled, bringing shipping traffic in the Strait to a near standstill.

Traders reacted swiftly on TradeXYZ, with crude oil contracts gaining about 4.52% compared to the weekend closing price, and S&P index contracts falling nearly 0.8%.

Trump then shifted his stance, revealing that envoy Steve Witkoff would travel to Pakistan for talks with the Iranian side on Tuesday, potentially extending the negotiation window until Wednesday.

He then turned around and posted on Truth Social, stating, "The deal we offered is very fair and reasonable, I hope they accept it, because if they don't, the U.S. will destroy every power plant and every bridge in Iran."

Iran was clearly not buying it. At 1:53 AM on the 20th, the Iranian side announced its refusal to participate in a second round of talks; according to Axios, Tehran's assessment was that the U.S. might launch an attack before the Tuesday night ceasefire expiration.

Driven by this news, crude oil surged again, clearing the highs from the 18th, while the S&P index correspondingly broke below the lows from the 18th.

On the individual stock front, three crypto-related stocks significantly underperformed others.

Predictably, the spreading optimism in the market last week will be punished. This week's market movements will largely depend on whether Iran can maintain its no-negotiation stance.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat event initially caused the surge in risk appetite in the markets on Friday?

AThe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane.

QWhat specific action did Iran take on Saturday that reversed the initial market optimism?

AIran re-imposed restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz and fired on vessels attempting to pass through, causing shipping to nearly halt.

QHow did crude oil futures react on TradeXYZ following the news of the Strait of Hormuz incident?

ACrude oil contracts rose by approximately 4.52% compared to the weekend's closing price.

QWhat was the content of Donald Trump's threat on Truth Social if Iran did not accept the U.S. deal?

AHe stated that if Iran did not accept the deal, the U.S. would 'destroy every power plant and every bridge in Iran.'

QWhat was the final event that caused crude oil to surge again and erase the previous day's highs?

AIran's announcement that it would refuse to participate in the second round of negotiations, fueled by reports that the U.S. might launch an attack before the ceasefire expired.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片