Pi Network Token Slides as Trade Tensions and Unlocks Pressure Price

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

Pi Network's native token, PI, declined sharply, approaching its October all-time low due to increased US-EU trade tensions and significant daily token unlocks. The price dropped roughly 8-9% in 24 hours to around $0.178. Geopolitical uncertainty escalated after the US announced new tariffs targeting eight countries, prompting an emergency EU meeting. Reports indicate French President Macron called for a "trade bazooka" against US market access. Additionally, over 4.6 million tokens are being released daily, creating substantial selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins. The token, which missed the January crypto rally, remains highly volatile amid these combined pressures.

The PI token of Pi Network fell toward its October low as US-EU trade tensions increased and more than 4.6 million daily unlocks ignited increasing selling pressure. The native token has fallen heavily over a 12-hour period, going near its October all-time low after weeks of price inactivity, as per the market data.

At the time of writing, PI is hovering about 0.178 USD, down about 8-9% in the past 24 hours. The fall of the token coincides with wider market unpredictability ignited by increasing trade tensions between the United States and the European Union.

The President of the United States publicised a new set of tariffs against 8 countries as part of efforts to buy Greenland from Denmark, as per the official statements. The European Union replied by setting an emergency meeting.

The Volatility Faced by Pi Token

The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, asked for the union to position a “trade bazooka” that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets, as per the report. In the beginning, the crypto market became stable as these geopolitical developments opened out but did not agree when Asian stock markets and futures opened, market data showed.

The Pi token, which had been influenced by volatility at the time of the last market fluctuations, faced potential losses at the time of this episode. The token was not a part of the January rally when the price of Bitcoin increased and a number of altcoins showed double-digit percentage gains, as per the price data.

The schedule of token unlock may show price instability, as per the industry analysts. The PiScanUnlock data reveals that the average number of daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors get access to the last locked coins. The Pi Network attained its previous all-time low in October, as per historical price records.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Canaan Risks Nasdaq Delisting as Shares Slip Below $1 Again

TagsCryptoPiPi Network

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main factors contributing to the decline of Pi Network's token price?

AThe decline is attributed to increasing US-EU trade tensions and over 4.6 million daily token unlocks creating significant selling pressure.

QWhat was the price of PI token at the time of writing and how much did it drop in 24 hours?

AAt the time of writing, PI token was hovering around $0.178, down approximately 8-9% in the past 24 hours.

QHow did the European Union respond to the new US tariffs announced against 8 countries?

AThe European Union responded by setting an emergency meeting to address the new tariffs.

QWhat specific measure did French President Emmanuel Macron propose regarding US-European trade relations?

AEmmanuel Macron asked the European Union to position a 'trade bazooka' that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets.

QHow many daily token unlocks were occurring according to PiScanUnlock data, and what concern does this raise?

APiScanUnlock data revealed that average daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight NewsHace 6 min(s)

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight NewsHace 6 min(s)

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片