Pi Network Temporarily Halts Wallet Payment Requests Amid Rising Scams

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2025-12-31Actualizado a 2025-12-31

Resumen

Pi Network has temporarily disabled its wallet payment request feature due to widespread scams. Scammers were impersonating official accounts and targeting high-balance wallets, tricking users into approving fraudulent requests, resulting in irreversible losses. Over a million PI tokens have been stolen this year, with one wallet receiving more than 838,000 tokens. The Pi Core Team clarified that the issue stems from user approval, not a system vulnerability, and emphasized that this is a common risk across crypto wallets. The token’s value dropped 10% following the incident but has since shown slight recovery. Recent updates include standardized KYC and testnet DEX improvements to enhance security and liquidity.

The Pi network, which is the mobile-first Cryptocurrency and web3 blockchain, recently posted a tweet on DEC 30 that the team has warned that scammers are exploiting the Payment request feature to steal Pi tokens from users’ balances. In the Pi network, the wallet balances are publicly visible, and the attackers are targeting the high-balance wallets and sending the payment request to the wallet as an impersonation of official Pi accounts or community moderators.

Once the user approves the payment request, the Tokens will be instantly transferred to the scammers’ account and will be gone forever. No reversal or recovery will be done. The Community reports indicate the scams are widespread, and one scammer’s wallet has received more than 838,000 PI tokens. Overall, more than a million PI tokens have been lost throughout the year. This created a panic situation among the users, and even the experienced users were tricked because the request looked legitimate.

Pi Core Team Denies System Vulnerability, Addresses Market and User Impact

After this incident happened, many users called it a wallet flaw, but the Core team clarified that the problem is from the human approval, not the protocol Flaw. They say that the wallet never sends funds on its own, and the transfer only happens after the user’s approval. This behavior exists in all major Crypto wallets. So to stop this scam, the PI network has disabled all payment requests network-wide. This stops the scams instantly and prevents further user losses. This makes the PI token safe, and it was the fastest way to contain the damage.

The token is currently trading at $0.204 with a market cap of 1.7 billion. The Token has dropped to 10% due to this issue. Recently, the token has updated its ecosystem by adding Standardized KYC to cut the verification backlogs by 50% and speed up mainnet migration for millions of users. Another update is from the testnet DEX, which makes the trading safer and easier by using Pi as the main trading Pair and improving the liquidity. This makes the token regain its momentum, and it has increased by 0.7% in 24 hours.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XDC Network Momentum Test: Will It Break Resistance or Slip Back to Lows?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the Pi Network temporarily halt wallet payment requests?

AThe Pi Network temporarily halted wallet payment requests to stop scammers who were exploiting the feature to steal Pi tokens by impersonating official accounts, preventing further user losses.

QHow were the scammers able to steal Pi tokens from users?

AScammers targeted high-balance wallets, sent payment requests while impersonating official Pi accounts or community moderators, and stole tokens once users approved these deceptive transactions.

QWhat was the Pi Core Team's response to the incident being called a 'wallet flaw'?

AThe Pi Core Team clarified that the issue was due to human approval of fraudulent requests, not a protocol flaw, emphasizing that transfers only occur after user authorization, similar to other crypto wallets.

QHow much Pi token value was reported lost due to these scams?

ACommunity reports indicated that over a million Pi tokens were lost throughout the year, with one scammer's wallet receiving more than 838,000 Pi tokens.

QWhat recent updates has the Pi Network implemented to improve its ecosystem?

AThe Pi Network recently added Standardized KYC to reduce verification backlogs by 50% and introduced updates to the testnet DEX, using Pi as the main trading pair to enhance safety and liquidity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot