Pi Network nears crucial price point: Breakout or bull trap for PI?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-06Actualizado a 2026-03-06

Resumen

Pi Network's PI token has shown strong performance, gaining 16.1% over the past week and 5% in the last 24 hours, contrasting Bitcoin's decline. However, the longer-term trend remains bearish. The price has reached a key psychological resistance at $0.20, which may be a bull trap rather than a sustainable breakout. Technical indicators like the OBV and Awesome Oscillator show buying pressure, but the CMF suggests underlying weakness. The daily chart structure is still bearish, and a break above $0.216 is needed to shift the trend bullishly. Traders are advised to watch for a close below $0.1857 to confirm bearish momentum. The breakout from the triangle pattern may be a retracement before further declines.

Pi Network [PI] has been a strong performer over the past week. According to CoinMarketCap data, it was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours.

This was encouraging news, especially when contrasted against Bitcoin’s [BTC] 1.4% plunge over the previous day.

This relative strength might give PI bulls the confidence to go long. Yet, as AMBCrypto reported earlier in the week, the altcoin’s longer-term trend might not favor the buyers in the coming days and weeks.

Are PI prices in a value area for traders?

On the daily chart, the price was back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone. The gains it has made over the past three weeks were a heartening sight to speculators, but it could be a trap.

The long-term trend remained bearish. The current rally was likely part of a retracement before the bearish move can continue. In the lower timeframes, a triangle pattern was spotted recently, which led to a strong breakout.

This breakout has reached the 78.6% retracement level at $0.197. The OBV has made higher highs during the rally, and the Awesome Oscillator was back above the zero line. Together, they indicated buying pressure and positive momentum.

On the other hand, the CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement. This was a contradictory sign, but it agreed with the longer-term price action- bulls were likely too weak to reverse the downtrend.

Traders, is it time to sell PI?

It was nearly time to sell PI. The H4 trend was bullish, exemplified by the break of the lower high at $0.1788 (cyan). The most recent higher low was at $0.1857 (green), while a local resistance level at $0.2055 (white) opposed further bullish expansion.

On this timeframe chart, the technical indicators were all bullish. Yet, the higher timeframe trends must be respected.

Traders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias. Meanwhile, a rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.


Final Summary

  • The Pi Network bullish breakout from the triangle pattern should not lull buyers into a false sense of security.
  • The longer-term swing structure remained bearish, and $0.216 must be breached to shift this swing structure in favor of the bulls.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price performance of Pi Network (PI) according to Bitcoin's recent movement?

APi Network was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours, while Bitcoin plunged 1.4% over the previous day.

QWhat key psychological supply zone is PI's price currently testing on the daily chart?

API's price is back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone.

QWhat contradictory signal does the CMF (Chaikin Money Flow) indicator show despite the recent rally?

AThe CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement, indicating potential weakness in buying pressure despite the rally.

QWhat price level needs to be breached to shift the 1-day structure to bullish according to the analysis?

AA rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.

QWhat should traders wait for to confirm a bearish bias on the H4 timeframe?

ATraders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片