PI beats BTC and ETH, yet resistance rejection raises red flags

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-15Actualizado a 2026-02-15

Resumen

Despite a significant 43.1% rally that outperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum, Pi Network (PI) faces a critical resistance level at $0.20. The surge, fueled by a network upgrade and a breakout from a descending wedge, was met with rejection at this key supply zone. High trading volume during the rally is seen as a potential sign of buyer exhaustion rather than strong conviction, often indicating that smart money is selling. Analysts caution against FOMO, suggesting a breakout above $0.20 followed by a successful retest is needed to confirm a bullish trend. Until then, the broader bearish bias and longer-term downtrend advise caution for traders.

Pi Network [PI] was one of the altcoins in the spotlight. With a 43.1% rally from Thursday’s low at $0.132, PI traders and investors might be tempted to buy the token. The buying idea becomes even more tempting when the gains are compared to leading crypto assets.

Bitcoin [BTC] was up 8.3%, and Ethereum [ETH] was up by 9.2% in the same time period. Yet, traders should be cautious and not give in to FOMO or arguments of relative strength.

Assessing the bullish argument

The Pi Network upgrade was one of the reasons behind the token’s strong recent gains. AMBCrypto reported that the shift toward a decentralized mainnet was a step forward in transferring responsibility from the developers to the community.

A breakout from a long-term descending wedge was also demonstrated. This has the potential to send prices to $0.267-$0.28.

However, the picture remained bearishly biased at the time of writing. The local supply zone at $0.20 remained resolute in the face of a buying frenzy.

Why buyers should be wary of the PI rally

The volume indicators were neutral at best, despite the high trading volume. The OBV was a noticeable distance from making a new high, and the CMF on the daily timeframe

The 1-day chart reinforced the importance of the $0.2 resistance. The recent, swift gains reaching and facing rejection at this band of supply were not a good development.

This is because, counter-intuitively, the high-volume surge into a key resistance area is generally followed by buyer exhaustion and a retracement of all the gains made. In other words, smart money tends to use these moves to sell.

Traders can wait for a breakout past $0.2 and a retest of the same as support to buy. Given the wider market sentiment, this was a highly risky endeavor.

Instead, swing traders and investors can maintain their bearish bias, which is in agreement with the longer-term downtrend.


Final Summary

  • The Pi Network token prices saw a strong rally to break out of a descending wedge at the same time as the network upgrade announcement came out.
  • The quick move into the overhead supply zone on high trading volume, and the rejection in recent hours, has a good chance of turning out to be a sign of buyer exhaustion and not conviction.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage gain of Pi Network (PI) from Thursday's low, and how does it compare to Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH)?

APi Network (PI) rallied 43.1% from Thursday's low. In the same time period, Bitcoin (BTC) was up 8.3% and Ethereum (ETH) was up 9.2%.

QWhat was one of the main reasons cited for Pi Network's recent strong price gains?

AOne of the main reasons for the strong recent gains was the Pi Network upgrade and the shift toward a decentralized mainnet, which transferred responsibility from the developers to the community.

QWhat key resistance level is highlighted as a significant obstacle for the PI price?

AThe key resistance level highlighted is the local supply zone at $0.20.

QAccording to the article, why should buyers be wary of the high-volume surge into the key resistance area?

ABuyers should be wary because a high-volume surge into a key resistance area is often followed by buyer exhaustion and a retracement of gains, as it can be a sign that smart money is using the move to sell.

QWhat cautious trading strategy does the article suggest for entering a long position in PI?

AThe article suggests traders wait for a breakout past the $0.20 resistance and then a successful retest of that level as support before considering a buy, noting that it is a highly risky endeavor given the market sentiment.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片