Out Of Office, Into Crypto: Ex-NYC Mayor Debuts ‘NYC Token’ Memecoin

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-14Actualizado a 2026-01-14

Resumen

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams launched the "NYC Token" memecoin on the Solana blockchain on January 12, 2026, promoting it as a tool to support education and combat antisemitism and anti-American sentiment. The token briefly reached an implied market cap between $580 million and $730 million before its price dropped by roughly 80%, falling from $0.46 to around $0.10. Critics raised concerns about insufficient transparency, missing documentation, and sudden liquidity withdrawals, which led to accusations of a potential rug pull. Adams, known for his pro-crypto stance as mayor, faced scrutiny for using his public profile to promote a privately issued token, while his successor declined to endorse the project.

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams unveiled a new cryptocurrency called “NYC Token” on January 12, 2026, drawing quick attention and equally fast criticism.

According to reports, Adams presented the project in Times Square and framed it as a way to support education and to fight anti-semitism and anti-American sentiment. The token is built on the Solana blockchain, based on information released at the launch.

Token Launch And Purpose

According to the official pitch and subsequent statements, proceeds from the token were to help fund scholarships and blockchain training programs for underserved communities.

Adams described the coin as a civic symbol tied to New York’s identity and global reach. The launch was promoted with promises of community benefits, but critics said the public information about governance and fund handling was thin.

Market Moves

The market reacted in a rush. Based on reports, the token briefly showed an implied market cap of about $580 million–$730 million in the first hours after trading began. Then prices tumbled.

Trades showed a fall of roughly 80% as the token’s price dropped from near $0.46 to about $0.10 shortly after markets opened for the asset. Trading volume spiked and then collapsed, leaving many traders facing big losses.

Liquidity And Allegations

On-chain observers and crypto analysts flagged sudden withdrawals of liquidity minutes after the token’s debut. Reports have disclosed that millions of dollars were pulled from trading pools, which prompted accusations of a rug pull from some corners of the crypto community.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.1 trillion. Chart: TradingView

The token’s official website was also criticized for missing or nonfunctional links to key documents, and there was little detail about which groups would receive funds or how decisions would be made.

Adams’ Crypto Record: Political Context

Eric Adams is no stranger to digital assets. During his time in office he converted parts of his salary to Bitcoin and Ethereum and pushed policies to attract blockchain firms to the city.

His successor, Mayor Zohran Mamdani, declined to take part in the token project and did not endorse it. That split in approach raised questions about whether a former official should use his public profile to promote a privately issued coin.

New York City at night. Image: Anthony Nazario for Lonely Planet

Public Response

Analysts called for transparency and urged a closer look at on-chain data. Based on reports from blockchain trackers, some transfers and liquidity extractions were visible publicly on the Solana network, which added to the scrutiny.

Community groups and investors asked for clearer disclosures, while legal experts warned that investigations or regulatory attention could follow if money was moved in ways that harmed ordinary buyers.

Featured image by ThomasShanahan / iStock.com, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the cryptocurrency launched by former New York City Mayor Eric Adams and on which blockchain was it built?

AThe cryptocurrency is called 'NYC Token' and it was built on the Solana blockchain.

QWhat was the stated purpose of the NYC Token according to its official pitch?

AThe stated purpose was to help fund scholarships and blockchain training programs for underserved communities, and to fight anti-semitism and anti-American sentiment.

QWhat happened to the token's price shortly after it began trading?

AThe token's price tumbled roughly 80%, dropping from near $0.46 to about $0.10 shortly after markets opened.

QWhat specific event after the token's debut prompted accusations of a 'rug pull' from the crypto community?

AOn-chain observers flagged sudden withdrawals of liquidity, where millions of dollars were pulled from trading pools minutes after the token's debut.

QHow did Eric Adams' successor, Mayor Zohran Mamdani, respond to the NYC Token project?

AMayor Zohran Mamdani declined to take part in the token project and did not endorse it.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片