OpenAI's Largest Internal Wealth Creation: 600 Individuals Cash Out $6.6 Billion Combined, 75 Take the Full $30 Million Cap

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-11Actualizado a 2026-05-11

Resumen

OpenAI conducted its largest-ever internal stock sale in October, allowing over 600 current and former employees to collectively cash out approximately $6.6 billion. About 75 individuals sold the maximum allowed amount of $30 million per person, a limit tripled from $10 million due to high investor demand. The tender offer was based on a $500 billion company valuation. President Greg Brockman confirmed in court that his OpenAI stake is worth around $30 billion. Employees collectively own about 26% of the company, with average paper wealth per employee around $1 billion, far exceeding pre-IPO norms at other major tech firms. Following a recent funding round at an $852 billion valuation and with monthly revenue reaching $2 billion, OpenAI is reportedly preparing for a potential trillion-dollar IPO in late 2026.

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Synopsis: The Wall Street Journal revealed the scale of wealth creation within OpenAI. In a staff stock sale last October, the company raised the personal cash-out limit from $10 million to $30 million. Over 600 current and former employees participated, cashing out a combined $6.6 billion, with approximately 75 individuals taking the full maximum amount. President Brockman confirmed in court this week that his stake is worth about $30 billion. Silicon Valley has never seen such a concentration of millionaires created by a private company before its IPO.

Image source: Wall Street Journal

In the past Silicon Valley, the typical path for ordinary employees to strike it rich was one: wait for the company to go public. OpenAI is rewriting that rule.

According to The Wall Street Journal, in an internal stock transaction completed last October, OpenAI allowed employees to sell up to $30 million in shares each. Over 600 current and former employees participated, cashing out approximately $6.6 billion in total. Informed sources revealed that about 75 of them took the full $30 million cap. This is the largest single employee stock sale event in the tech industry to date.

Cash-Out Cap Tripled, Driven by External Investor Demand

OpenAI originally set a single cash-out limit of $10 million for employees. However, due to external investor demand far exceeding expectations, the company tripled the cap to $30 million last fall.

The transaction was completed at a $500 billion valuation, with investors including Thrive Capital, SoftBank, Dragoneer Investment Group, Abu Dhabi's MGX, and T. Rowe Price. As previously reported by CNBC, OpenAI initially planned a sale of about $6 billion, later expanded to $10.3 billion, but the actual transaction ended up being around $6.6 billion. Internally, the lower participation rate was interpreted as a vote of confidence in the long-term prospects by employees.

According to OpenAI's rules, employees can sell shares after two years of service. This means many employees who joined after ChatGPT's launch at the end of 2022 had their first opportunity to cash in options in this transaction. The value of OpenAI's stock has increased over 100-fold in the past seven years.

Brockman Confirms $30 Billion Stake in Court, Musk's Lawyer Presses Relentlessly

The scale of wealth held by executives is even more staggering. According to NBC, OpenAI President and Co-founder Greg Brockman confirmed during testimony on May 4th that his current OpenAI equity is worth approximately $30 billion.

This figure was disclosed on the fourth day of the trial in Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI. Musk's lawyer, Steven Molo, repeatedly referenced this number during over two hours of questioning, pressing Brockman on why he hadn't fulfilled a promised $100,000 donation while amassing a $30 billion fortune. According to CNBC, Brockman admitted, "It is true I ultimately did not make the donation."

As reported by Fortune, Musk's legal team also revealed multi-layered financial ties between Brockman and CEO Sam Altman: Altman provided Brockman with about $10 million in equity from his family office as early as 2017; Brockman also holds stakes in AI chip startup Cerebras and nuclear fusion company Helion Energy. OpenAI had previously discussed acquiring Cerebras, and Altman has invested hundreds of millions in Helion. Musk's side argues these cross-holdings compromised Brockman's independence as a fiduciary.

Employees Hold 26% Stake, Average Paper Wealth Exceeds Returns of Most VC Funds

Following the company restructuring completed last October, OpenAI employees collectively hold about 26% of the company's equity.

According to an analysis by StartupHub, approximately 165 current and former employees collectively hold equity worth about $164.9 billion, averaging nearly $1 billion in paper wealth per person. This exceeds the total lifetime returns of most venture capital funds.

According to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal and data firm Equilar, OpenAI's per capita stock-based compensation in 2025 is about $1.5 million. This is over 7 times the figure for Google before its 2004 IPO, and 34 times the average for 18 large tech companies in the year before their IPOs over the past 25 years.

The company's equity-based compensation expense constitutes nearly half of its projected revenue, far surpassing peers like Palantir, Meta, and Salesforce.

$852 Billion Valuation, Trillion-Dollar IPO on Horizon, Wealth Creation Far From Over

OpenAI completed a $122 billion financing round on March 31st this year at an $852 billion valuation, setting a new record for the largest single private funding round in Silicon Valley history. Amazon led the investment with $50 billion, while Nvidia and SoftBank each invested $30 billion. The company's current monthly revenue is $2 billion, with over 900 million weekly active ChatGPT users and more than 50 million paid subscribers.

According to multiple media reports, OpenAI is preparing for an IPO in the fourth quarter of 2026, with a target valuation potentially reaching $1 trillion. If successful, this would become one of the largest tech IPOs in history. CFO Sarah Friar previously stated at Davos that the company plans to allocate a portion of the IPO shares to retail investors.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, how many OpenAI employees participated in the internal stock sale and what was the total amount cashed out?

AOver 600 current and former employees participated, cashing out a total of approximately $6.6 billion.

QWhat was the new individual cash-out limit set for the October stock sale, and how did it compare to the previous limit?

AThe new individual cash-out limit was set at $30 million. It was a threefold increase from the previous limit of $10 million.

QWhat did OpenAI president Greg Brockman reportedly confirm about his stake in the company during the Musk vs. OpenAI trial?

AHe confirmed that his current OpenAI equity is worth approximately $30 billion.

QWhat percentage of OpenAI is owned by employees, and what is the approximate average paper wealth per employee as cited by StartupHub?

AEmployees collectively own about 26% of OpenAI. According to StartupHub, around 165 employees hold a total of approximately $164.9 billion in equity, averaging about $1 billion in paper wealth per person.

QWhat is OpenAI's reported monthly revenue, and when is its IPO potentially scheduled to launch according to the article?

AOpenAI's monthly revenue is reported to be $2 billion. Its IPO is potentially scheduled to launch in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

The core thesis for 2026 investment is a shift from traditional growth-inflation analysis towards a geopolitical framework of strategic blocs, supply chain reconfiguration, and capital expenditure (capex) direction. The US is moving from a global guarantor role towards a more bounded "camp system," reshaping trade, security, and technology flows. Key investment themes emerge from this realignment: production-capable US-aligned economies (e.g., Japan, South Korea), regional security focusing on Latin America, and the hard constraint of energy/grid capacity enabling reshoring. Europe's strength lies not in macro growth but in its high-quality "pick-and-shovel" industrial, electrical, and automation exporters serving the global capex cycle. AI remains the central US-China strategic battleground, driving massive investment in compute, power, and manufacturing stacks, with robotics gaining prominence. The investment implication is a rotation away from crowded US mega-cap tech momentum toward global beneficiaries of this restructuring: electrification equipment, industrial automation, energy storage, grid infrastructure, and select non-US markets. 2026 will be defined by investment intensity driven by geopolitical repositioning, not near-term commercial maturity.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

A federal appeals court has rejected Sam Bankman-Fried's bid for a new trial, upholding his convictions in the FTX fraud case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied defense claims of an unfair trial, sharply narrowing his legal options. His team could still petition the US Supreme Court. The ruling reinforces the legal precedent from one of crypto's most consequential cases, keeping focus on FTX's collapse, customer losses, and ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. For the market, the decision underscores the lasting impact of FTX on regulatory debates concerning exchange oversight, custody rules, and asset segregation as the industry works to rebuild trust.

bitcoinistHace 40 min(s)

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

bitcoinistHace 40 min(s)

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros