On-Chain Lending Bull Market Logic: The Inflection Point Has Arrived, How to Position?

比推Publicado a 2026-01-26Actualizado a 2026-01-26

Resumen

On-chain Lending Bull Market Logic: Inflection Point Arrived, How to Position? The on-chain lending market is at a cyclical inflection point (Stage 4), characterized by low capital and low interest rates. Key drivers for the next growth phase include necessary product upgrades to attract institutional capital, unlocking new demand, and capital returning as rates stabilize above risk-free rates. The sector's valuation multiples are compressing towards Fintech levels (currently 21x-42x P/S vs. 8.4x for public Fintech lenders), presenting a potential entry opportunity for 2026. Critical developments include: - **Superior Collateral**: Modular protocols (e.g., Kamino, Aave, Morpho) enabling higher-risk lending and tokenization of traditional assets (e.g., securities lending, HELOCs). - **Protocol Improvements**: New loan types (term loans, whitelisted addresses, tri-party agreements) improving capital efficiency and compressing spreads. - **Yield Generation**: Tokenized yield products (e.g., 8-15% returns from credit funds) becoming crucial for yield funds as basis trade returns compress. The thesis suggests sustainable lending demand growth can occur even if crypto prices decline, with fundamental catalysts providing a stronger foundation for the next cycle.

Source: X

Author: Noah

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


Core Summary

  • Product Upgrades: On-chain lending will undergo necessary product improvements to better cater to the needs of scaled capital.

  • Demand Release: As functionalities are released, the current low lending rates will induce strong borrowing demand.

  • Capital Inflow: Lending rates will begin to stabilize above the risk-free rate, thereby driving capital inflows.

  • Valuation Return: The sector's valuation multiples are compressing towards Fintech levels, providing a potential entry opportunity for investment next year.

The Cyclical Pattern of On-Chain Lending

Historically, on-chain lending has followed a cyclical behavior with four phases:

  1. Low capital in the system, low interest rates.

  2. Rising interest rates, capital flows into the system.

  3. Due to excess capital, interest rates begin to fall.

  4. Due to excessively low rates, capital leaves the system.

Lending protocol token prices tend to follow a similar pattern: prices rise as interest rates increase and capital flows in, and fall as interest rates decrease and capital flows out.

We are currently in the fourth phase. In the past, lending markets could rely on the positive Beta of the crypto market to induce leverage demand, thereby pushing up interest rates; or use token subsidies to stimulate higher yields. Token subsidies worked in highly "reflexive" markets (high price = more subsidies = more platform capital = higher price), but there may no longer be an excess capital base willing to participate in this behavior. I believe most lending protocols are no longer willing to tie their fate to the crypto market's Beta, and subsidies are difficult to scale without increasing costs.

The current issue causing stablecoin lending rates to be below the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) is: 1. Insufficient borrowing demand; 2. Capital inefficiencies caused by protocols (such as cash drag from the peer-to-pool model, lack of rehypothecation mechanisms, etc.). Furthermore, on-chain lending rates are significantly lower than most alternative capital sources, a state that is clearly not a long-term equilibrium.

How to Stimulate Lending Demand?

The key to inducing lending demand is to offer a lower price than the alternatives. The current problem is that lending protocols cannot yet provide the collateral asset classes and loan structures that borrowers are accustomed to.

1. Higher Quality Collateral Assets

The security of "monolithic" lending protocols depends on their worst-quality asset, so they tend to be overly conservative when introducing new assets. Currently, almost all protocols are shifting to a modular architecture to allow for higher-risk lending.

Many traditional collateral assets are currently difficult to obtain on-chain. Securities lending is a multi-trillion dollar market, with settlement rates typically at $SOFR + 75-250$ basis points. Although still in its early stages, we are seeing the beginnings of securities lending, such as Kamino's Superstate market, Aave's Horizon market, and Morpho's curated markets.

2. Protocol Design Improvements

Historically, lending protocols primarily offered floating-rate margin loans for highly liquid crypto assets using a "peer-to-pool" model. This only suits a narrow group of borrowers and imposes a substantial cash drag on lenders due to utilization-based interest rate models.

Kamino, Aave, and Morpho are all releasing upgrades this year to significantly expand loan types. As protocols add features like term loans, address whitelisting, tri-party agreements with compliant custodians, and direct matching, lenders will see spread compression (more of what the borrower pays flows to the lender), and borrowers will gain more flexible loan options.

This will induce borrowing demand, push up interest rates, and subsequently attract capital supply, moving us into "Phase Two" of the lending cycle.

Creating High-Yield Opportunities

High-yield opportunities are crucial for the survival of crypto yield funds. While the market might survive without them, it's better not to take that risk. Historically, on-chain yield funds needed 12-15% returns to justify their existence and raise capital.

Due to the tokenization of basis trades and the increased capital efficiency of CME basis trades, basis yields have been compressed for the foreseeable future. Achieving lending demand above 10% would require an (unpredictable) crypto bull market.

This means funds will be forced to seek opportunities with slightly higher risk but good risk-adjusted returns. The most likely opportunities lie in the entry of tokenized yield products. For example, Figure has already launched tokenized Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) with an 8% yield, and yield funds can use revolving leverage on Kamino to achieve returns exceeding their target rate.

2026 may see more equivalents of credit funds being tokenized, offering 8-15% yields. A word of caution: revolving leverage carries risks that are difficult to quantify, and the legal structures of tokenized credit products must be sound.

Conclusion

I believe there is a plausible logic: even if token prices continue to fall, on-chain lending demand can still grow sustainably. While I refrain from commenting on the Beta valuation of the crypto market, if the above logic holds, protocol valuations will become very reasonable at some point in 2026.

Data Calculation:

Assuming on-chain lending companies extract 5-10% of interest as revenue, with an average interest rate of 6.5%. The current Price/Sales (P/S) multiple for the sector is 21x to 42x, while listed Fintech lending companies are around 8.4x.

While the nuances between the two are not worth debating, you must be optimistic about on-chain lending over the next two years for the current valuation multiples to seem reasonable. Even so, these multiples are compressing rapidly due to falling token prices and growth in Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

I believe 2026 will be an opportunity to "swing big" in this sector. Although short-term growth may be slow due to falling crypto asset prices, the upcoming fundamental catalysts could provide another inflection point for on-chain lending activity, with greater sustainability.

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606139

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the four cyclical stages of on-chain lending described in the article?

A1. Low system capital and low interest rates. 2. Rising interest rates and capital inflow into the system. 3. Interest rates begin to fall due to excess capital. 4. Capital leaves the system due to excessively low interest rates.

QWhat are the two main reasons identified for the current problem of stablecoin lending rates being below the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)?

A1. Insufficient borrowing demand. 2. Capital inefficiencies caused by protocol design (e.g., cash drag from the peer-to-pool model, lack of re-collateralization mechanisms).

QAccording to the article, what are the two key areas of improvement needed to stimulate borrowing demand in on-chain lending?

A1. Access to higher-quality collateral assets (e.g., traditional securities). 2. Improvements in protocol design to offer more flexible loan types like term loans, whitelisted addresses, and tri-party agreements.

QWhy are high-yield opportunities crucial for crypto yield funds, and what is a potential source for these opportunities mentioned in the article?

ACrypto yield funds historically needed 12-15% returns to justify their existence and raise capital. A potential source for these opportunities is tokenized yield products, such as tokenized home equity loans (HELOCs) or other tokenized credit fund equivalents offering 8-15% yields.

QHow does the article's valuation analysis compare the Price-to-Sales (P/S) multiples of on-chain lending protocols to traditional Fintech lending companies?

AThe article states that the current P/S multiple for the on-chain lending sector is 21x to 42x, while the multiple for listed Fintech lending companies is around 8.4x, indicating a compression towards Fintech levels.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar CORE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar CORE (CORE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar CORE (CORE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu CORE (CORE)Después de comprar tu CORE (CORE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear CORE (CORE)Tradear fácilmente con CORE (CORE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

288 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar CORE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de CORE (CORE).

活动图片