Official Trump: Should traders sell before TRUMP drops to $2.36?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-10Actualizado a 2026-03-10

Resumen

The memecoin sector posted overall gains of 0.93%, reaching a market cap of $29.93 billion. While some memecoins like PIPPIN and PENGU saw short-term gains, Official Trump (TRUMP) declined 4.23% in 24 hours and has been one of the weakest performers, down 15.8% over the past week and 39.6% year-to-date. The token has been in a sustained downtrend, failing to reclaim key resistance levels. Technical analysis suggests further downside, with potential price targets at $2.368 and $1.312. Although a short-term bounce may occur due to bullish divergence, it is likely an opportunity to sell rather than a trend reversal. The overall outlook for TRUMP remains bearish.

The memecoin sector posted overall gains, rising 0.93% to reach a total market cap of $29.93 billion.

At press time, the best-performing popular memes in the short-term were Pippin [PIPPIN] and Pudgy Penguins [PENGU], gaining 14.2% and 4.6%, respectively, in 24 hours.

Dogecoin [DOGE] was only up 0.59% for the day, by contrast, and Official Trump [TRUMP] was down by 4.23%. TRUMP has been one of the weakest memes over the past week, sliding 15.8% and operating within a longer-term downtrend.

In 2026, Official Trump has recorded a 39.6% drawdown. The bearish long-term trend meant that more losses were likely.

Plotting the next TRUMP price target

The first two weeks of the year saw a sizeable bounce across the crypto market, and Official Trump token prices also surged briefly above $5.5. Towards the end of January, the price fell below the previous swing low at $4.68 (orange).

This marked a continuation of the downtrend. Since then, the bears have remained in control, driving prices lower relentlessly. In early February, a big imbalance (white box) was left around $3.6-$4.1

Over the past month, TRUMP prices visited this area multiple times, but were unable to climb meaningfully into it. This highlighted the $4 zone as a powerful supply zone. At the time of writing, the price was below the psychological round number support at $3.

The Fibonacci extension levels showed that the next price targets were $2.368 and $1.312.

Should traders sell the bounce?

The 4-hour chart showed a bullish divergence between the price and the momentum. It was a sign that a price bounce was likely, but it would not be enough to reverse the downtrend. Instead, traders can use the price bounce to sell.

The Fibonacci retracement levels showed that the bounce could reach $3.01-$3.05. Traders can watch out for a bearish reaction from $2.95-3.05 before selling the memecoin.


Final Summary

  • The memecoin sector saw some bullishness in the past 24 hours, but it was too little momentum to reverse the longer-term downtrend.
  • TRUMP was one of the weaker-performing memes, and its downtrend looks likely to continue.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the overall performance of the memecoin sector and its total market cap at the time of the article?

AThe memecoin sector posted overall gains of 0.93%, reaching a total market cap of $29.93 billion.

QWhich two memecoins were the best-performing in the short-term, and what were their 24-hour gains?

APippin [PIPPIN] and Pudgy Penguins [PENGU] were the best-performing, gaining 14.2% and 4.6% respectively in 24 hours.

QHow has the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin performed over the past week and what is its longer-term trend?

ATRUMP was down 4.23% for the day and has been one of the weakest memes over the past week, sliding 15.8% and operating within a longer-term downtrend.

QAccording to the Fibonacci extension levels, what are the next potential price targets for TRUMP?

AThe next price targets for TRUMP are $2.368 and $1.312.

QWhat trading strategy does the article suggest for TRUMP based on the 4-hour chart analysis?

AThe article suggests that traders can use a potential price bounce to sell, watching for a bearish reaction from the $2.95-$3.05 zone (a Fibonacci retracement level) as an opportunity to exit.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 38 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 38 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片