Odaily Exclusive丨Polymarket Opens Store in New York, Kalshi Gives Away $50 Supermarket Vouchers: Are Prediction Markets Now Handing Out Eggs Too?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

Polymarket and Kalshi, two leading prediction market platforms, are launching offline promotional campaigns in New York to attract users ahead of the Super Bowl. Kalshi hosted a pop-up event at a local supermarket, offering $50 worth of free groceries to participants, while Polymarket is set to open a "free grocery store" in New York on February 12, alongside a $1 million donation to a local food bank. These initiatives aim to engage users with low-barrier, real-world event predictions, such as gas price changes. The campaigns also appear strategically timed to align with local political discussions around food affordability and potential regulatory changes, including proposed bills that could restrict prediction markets in New York. The author notes that such offline tactics echo classic user-acquisition strategies long used in China’s internet industry.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010)

"Each generation has its own eggs to claim"—the value of this statement continues to rise!

This time, the two giants of the prediction market—Kalshi and Polymarket—are the ones stirring up this egg-grabbing battle.

To gain more attention ahead of the "American Super Bowl," the two platforms recently started their own "offline promotion performances"—Kalshi gave away $50 worth of free groceries to users at a supermarket in New York; Polymarket went even further, directly launching its long-planned "first free grocery store in New York," scheduled to open on February 12. In the competition for attention and user growth, the prediction market giants, valued at tens of billions of dollars, have chosen the most old-school but effective "offline promotion" route.

Regarding this, we immediately contacted Odaily Planet Daily’s New York-based colleague Connie to get the latest on "Kalshi and Polymarket’s offline promotions" and real information such as "how much $50 can actually buy in New York," to share with our readers.

When Prediction Market Giants Dive into Offline Promotions: Kalshi’s Pop-Up, Polymarket’s "Instant Store"

As one of America’s major metropolises, New York has become a battleground and focal point for the two prediction market giants, Kalshi and Polymarket.

Addressing the increasingly pressing issue of rising living costs in New York and across the U.S., Kalshi and Polymarket have rolled out their big moves—

On February 3, Kalshi 【limited time】 offered $50 worth of free groceries to select users at Westside Market on Third Avenue, 84th Street, to attract more users to participate in various real-event predictions on its platform.

Judging from the surrounding "flyers," "supermarket KT boards," and other promotional materials, Kalshi’s offline promotion更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”,更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“极速快闪活动” (pop-up event), collaborating with local supermarkets to place offline materials for a short time, using "free $50 groceries" as "bait" to attract people to line up, participate, and spectate. This was also confirmed by Connie.

Additionally, it's clear that through this pop-up, Kalshi hopes to get more people to join the prediction market by betting on everyday, low-threshold, easy-to-understand questions like "Will New York City's gas price exceed $3.3 this year?" thereby achieving commercial goals like brand marketing and user activation.

Kalshi co-branded pop-up supermarket eggs were snapped up

Compared to Kalshi's somewhat crude and highly commercial approach, Polymarket's preparations were much more thorough.

On February 3, slightly earlier than Kalshi's announcement, Polymarket officially announced that after months of offline preparation, it plans to open the "first free grocery store in New York" on February 12 (EST) by leasing a physical storefront. Additionally, Polymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank to address the "hunger issue" in the area.

Polymarket also released actual photos of distributing vegetables like tomatoes and eggplants offline, instantly reminiscent of the domestic internet platform's ground promotion era, full of the vibe of "download the APP get eggs" or "first recharge get newcomer gift pack."

It is worth mentioning that Polymarket not only emphasized that "Polymarket's offline store is well-stocked, no purchase necessary," but also called on everyone to donate to the New York City Food Bank at the end of its tweet, encouraging people to take practical action to solve the real "hunger problem" caused by high food costs and high cost of living.

Seeing this, I can't help but sigh—

Fake crypto project ground promotion: Hold offline conferences, eat seafood feasts, shill various fake concept tokens;

Real crypto project ground promotion: Give away vegetables, give away eggs, open offline stores to distribute free food, do charity and public welfare, call on people to donate and show love.

Regarding the real purchasing power of Kalshi and Polymarket's "egg collection activities," we also had a detailed discussion with Connie from Odaily in New York.

The Real Purchasing Power of $50 in New York, USA: 5 McDonald's Meals, 1.5 lbs of Beef, or 2 Days of Food for the Average Person

According to Connie, the real purchasing power of $50 in New York, USA, can be considered "quite valuable."

"Buying a 0.5 lb (about 0.45 kg) portion of beef at a local supermarket in New York costs about $18, so $50 can buy about 1.5 lbs of beef," which is enough protein for an adult's three meals a day. For comparison, the price of one jin (0.5 kg) of beef in China is only about 30 RMB, which is only 1/8 of the cost in New York.

Converting to the well-known "Big Mac Index," the real purchasing power of $50 is also quite astonishing—a cheeseburger combo meal delivery with about 800-1000 calories costs about $10.89, so $50 can buy about 5 combo meals; if you buy a double burger with 580 calories, it only costs about $7.20. Of course, this price is "sky-high" domestically; the same burger combo in China only costs 25-40 RMB, which is only 1/2 the price of the same food in New York.

In other words, spent frugally, $50 is close to covering the food cost for an average person in New York for about 2 days (calculated as 5~6 meals). According to Connie, Kalshi's event attracted many Americans to line up for "free food," and "Americans' enthusiasm for lining up to receive things is even higher than that of Chinese people." Polymarket's "offline free grocery store" is also expected to attract a large crowd to line up and participate. Based on the existing information released by Kalshi and Polymarket, the hard costs of the two platforms' related activities are estimated to be at least $50,000 to $100,000.

Investing so much manpower and resources, beyond doing charity and showing love, Kalshi and Polymarket also have their own "business calculations."

The "Business Strategy" Behind Prediction Market Platforms "Giving Away Eggs": Using Political Issues to Influence Institutional Regulation

None of the above food donation activities by Kalshi and Polymarket were coordinated or communicated with the New York City government; they were spontaneous company actions.

However, the wording and purpose of their external statements are very similar to the "policies" repeatedly emphasized by New York's new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, during his campaign—the latter had proposed "opening publicly owned grocery stores in New York's five boroughs to lower food prices." Furthermore, Zohran Mamdani pointed out that city-owned grocery stores could reduce rent and operating costs through non-profit operating models and the use of public property. This proposal is still in the pilot stage, and a final implementation timetable has not been determined.

On the other hand, as one of the important key states in the U.S., New York's legislators are busy drafting new bills targeting the emerging prediction market industry. Among them, the 《ORACLE Act》 plans to restrict or prohibit New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events and impose stricter restrictions on event-based prediction markets; another piece of legislation plans to require prediction market operators to obtain a state-issued license before operating.

It is clear that some legislative decision-makers still have various concerns about prediction markets, viewing them as similar to unregulated gambling or more susceptible to insider manipulation.

In light of this, although the New York mayor has no direct jurisdiction over the regulation of prediction markets (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Regulatory authority over prediction market platforms belongs to state and federal governments), Kalshi and Polymarket's move may also be an attempt to seek regulatory friendliness through indirect means.

Finally, regardless of the ultimate impact of their "egg-giving" actions, we have to say that China's internet promotion models are at least 5-10 years ahead of the Western world.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two major prediction market platforms mentioned in the article that are conducting offline promotions in New York?

AKalshi and Polymarket.

QWhat specific free benefit did Kalshi offer to users during its flash promotion at a New York market?

AKalshi offered a $50 free food benefit to users.

QWhat is the name of the bill mentioned in the article that aims to restrict or ban New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events?

AThe ORACLE Act.

QHow much did Polymarket donate to the New York City Food Bank, as stated in the article?

APolymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated cost of a 0.5-pound portion of beef in a New York supermarket?

AA 0.5-pound portion of beef costs approximately $18 in a New York supermarket.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片