NYSE Plans to Launch 24/7 Tokenized Stock Trading, Leaving 'Competitors' Stunned

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

NYSE plans to launch a 24/7 tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform, a move seen as a direct response to Nasdaq’s earlier application for tokenized stock trading. The proposed platform would support round-the-clock trading of U.S. stocks and ETFs, fractional shares, stablecoin-based settlements, and instant settlement, while integrating NYSE’s existing matching engine with blockchain technology. Tokenized stocks would retain traditional rights like dividends and governance. The initiative is viewed as both an opportunity and a threat. Proponents argue it validates crypto’s core innovations—24/7 trading, instant settlement, and global access—and represents a major step toward merging traditional and crypto assets. Critics, however, warn it may disadvantage retail investors, increase market complexity, and primarily benefit exchanges through higher fees. While NYSE’s proposal is more comprehensive than Nasdaq’s, regulatory approval from the SEC is not expected before late 2026. This leaves a window for crypto-native platforms to leverage advantages like permissionless access, global liquidity, and leveraged products. The key battleground will be where liquidity, attention, and users converge.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

"Flash Crash Monday" is not over yet. Just now, the crypto market was hit by another bombshell—according to multiple media sources, the NYSE plans to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain platform supporting 24/7 trading. After investing $2 billion in Polymarket last year, the ICE Group is once again joining the wave of cryptocurrency transformation, this time using its stock exchange as the vehicle. It is worth mentioning that as early as last September, its "rival" Nasdaq had already submitted an application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading. This move by the NYSE is also interpreted by the outside world as a response to competition among stock exchanges.

Odaily Planet Daily will briefly summarize the market views related to this event and explore its potential impact.

NYSE Can't Sit Still: A More Radical "On-Chain Tokenized Stock Solution" Than Nasdaq

After Trump took office, the U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory environment changed dramatically. As a result, crypto IPOs, stablecoins, PayFi, and DeFi have swept away the policy gloom of the Biden era and developed rapidly. According to statistics, last year's stablecoin trading volume reached $33 trillion, a sharp increase of 72% year-on-year. Behind this is the substantial revenue and profits earned by stablecoin issuers Tether and Circle, as well as the massive liquidity that can be directed to the stock securities market.

Moreover, unlike Nasdaq's application to the SEC for tokenized stock trading last September, nearly six months later, the NYSE's moves related to "tokenized stock trading" are not just an application to regulators but a complete set of "on-chain solutions." Recommended reading: "The Self-Revolution of U.S. Stock Exchanges: Nasdaq Applies for Tokenized Stock Trading, Targeting a Trillion-Dollar Market."

Specifically, the NYSE's "on-chain tokenized stock solution" includes the following three aspects:

  1. This is a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform that plans to support 24/7 trading of U.S. stocks and ETF funds, fractional share trading, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant delivery, and will combine NYSE's existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system.
  2. According to the NYSE's plan, tokenized stocks will have the same dividends and governance rights as traditional securities.
  3. NYSE's parent company, ICE, is also collaborating with banking giants such as BNY Mellon and Citigroup to explore tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure to support cross-time zone, round-the-clock fund and margin management.

In comparison, if Nasdaq's tokenized stock application seems like a "new bottle for old wine" move in response to policy, then the NYSE's plan seems more like a "new retail trading platform" that integrates all links from "brewing-packaging-distribution-recycling."

Most importantly, the NYSE's "tokenized stock" trading platform supports 24/7 trading, which was originally one of the advantages of various cryptocurrencies over securities stocks. Now, this advantage becomes a joke in the face of the massive asset targets and liquidity of the world's largest stock exchange, the NYSE.

As a result, there are some pessimistic views in the crypto market: "The RWA sector of the cryptocurrency market and its increasingly tight liquidity will face the strictest 'father.' Compared to the NYSE, which has an annual trading volume of over a hundred trillion dollars, crypto RWA projects can almost be said to be non-existent."

What Do Industry Practitioners Think: Mixed Impacts, the Past Is the Past, the Present Is Now

In 1792, 24 securities brokers signed the Buttonwood Agreement under a buttonwood tree outside 68 Wall Street in New York, marking the birth of the predecessor of the NYSE. At that time, due to limited investment targets and market activity, stock trading hours were relatively flexible, with no strict continuous trading sessions. Brokers mainly conducted transactions through auctions or informal methods.

On March 8, 1817, the organization drafted a charter and officially changed its name to the New York Stock and Exchange Board.

In May 1887, the NYSE standardized stock trading hours to "Monday to Friday: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; Saturday: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m."

In 1952, Saturday trading was officially canceled.

In 1985, stock trading opening time was advanced to 9:30 a.m., and closing was extended to 4:00 p.m., forming the current 9:30–16:00 session, which has lasted for about 41 years.

If the NYSE's application for 24/7 tokenized stock trading is approved, it means that this decades- or even centuries-old "limited-time trading model" will become history. From this perspective, the crypto market has gained high recognition from the financial mainstream.

Pro View: The Era's Express Train Is Approaching

BTC OG and BankToTheFuture founder Simon Dixon posted, "Nothing can stop this (era's) train. Tokens are IOUs for actual assets held by custodians, supplementing DTCC claims. All-day trading can be achieved without tokens. This is an upgraded version of the surveillance state. You will own nothing and be happy." The accompanying picture shows BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Coinbase CEO Brain Armstrong embracing.

Indian crypto KOL Open4profit posted, "(This will) allow the market to react immediately to global news; AI and algorithms will play a greater role in pricing and risk management; this is a major change for the stock market, so keep a close eye on liquidity changes."

Redstone DeFi co-founder Marcin saw a "startup opportunity," saying, "This is a good start and fits exactly with what we are going to do next."

Wintermute OTC head Jake O also highly affirmed this: "Traditional infrastructure can extend trading hours but cannot solve T+1/2 friction or eliminate rent-seeking that increases costs and delays. Ironically, crypto solved this years ago: 24/7 trading, instant settlement, global access, no gatekeepers or (traditional bank) 'data fees.' Convergence is inevitable: equity trading on-chain, atomic settlement, the line between 'crypto' assets and 'traditional' assets will completely disappear. Welcome to the 21st century..."

Of course, some see it as an opportunity, while others see it as a threat.

Con View: Exchanges Reap the Benefits, the Suffering Falls on the New Generation of Young People

Unlike the industry view that the NYSE's move will stimulate the crypto market and promote cryptocurrency popularization, some industry insiders also see potential problems.

L1D partner LouisT posted: "The entire global financial system is moving on-chain, but somehow, they don't seem to be bidding for our 'bear-drug-like' tokens." In other words, traditional financial markets are not buying into the so-called RWA assets of cryptocurrencies.

MoonRock Capital founder expressed concern about the living conditions of the younger generation: "This is not good news for the baby boomers; your lives have become more difficult." This likely means that compared to previous generations with more increments, the baby boomer generation faces a more complex investment environment and a round-the-clock "liquidity gaming stage."

BingX advisor Nebraskangooner also raised his doubts: "Why make the stock market trade 24 hours a day? No one wants this except the exchanges. The only benefit is that without the interference of after-hours trading, stop-loss and take-profit points can truly function. I wonder what impact this will have on stock price movements after earnings reports?" This view focuses more on information impact and exchange profits.

Summary: There Is Still a Gap Between Traditional Finance and Crypto-Native Groups, and the Window of Opportunity for Users and Entrepreneurs Remains

Finally, I would like to briefly share my personal views based on the above information:

First, based on existing information, the NYSE's relevant application may be approved as early as the end of 2026, and the main approval authority is still the U.S. SEC. For crypto platforms, this is an important time gap.

Second, the main service targets of the NYSE's tokenized stock trading and on-chain settlement platform are likely still conventional investment institutions and compliant investors. For crypto-native groups and even global investors, what they need is not only the satisfaction of functional needs but also the realization of "KYC-free registration trading, global asset liquidity allocation, and riskier high-leverage" through tokenized stock and RWA platforms. This may be the advantage of crypto RWA projects.

Finally, the core purpose of the NYSE, Nasdaq, and others in promoting stock tokenization is still trading volume and fees. Like CEXs constantly listing new token projects, in the short term, they may still need to learn from CEXs, DEXs, and even on-chain Perp DEXs. This is also the basis for existing mature platforms to counterattack. By then, it is not impossible for U.S. stock exchanges like the NYSE and Nasdaq to fall from their pedestals. The key still lies in where the liquidity is, where the attention is, and where the user base is.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat major change is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) planning to implement according to the article?

AThe NYSE plans to launch a tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement platform that supports 7*24 hour trading, fractional share trading, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant settlement for U.S. stocks and ETF funds.

QHow does the NYSE's tokenized stock trading proposal differ from Nasdaq's application submitted last September?

AUnlike Nasdaq's application, which was seen as a regulatory response, the NYSE's proposal is a comprehensive 'on-chain solution' that integrates its existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system and includes collaborations with major banks for tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure.

QWhat is one significant advantage of the NYSE's proposed 7*24 hour trading platform mentioned in the article?

AIt eliminates the traditional limited trading hours advantage that cryptocurrencies previously held, as the NYSE's platform would offer continuous trading with massive asset coverage and liquidity.

QWhat are some concerns raised by crypto industry participants regarding the NYSE's move?

ASome concerns include the potential marginalization of existing crypto RWA projects due to the NYSE's scale, increased complexity and risk for younger investors, and the fact that exchanges may benefit more than users from 24/7 trading.

QWhat potential opportunity does the article suggest for crypto-native platforms despite the NYSE's entry into tokenized trading?

ACrypto-native platforms can leverage their strengths in offering no-KYC registration, global asset liquidity allocation, and higher-risk leveraged trading, which may not be fully addressed by traditional institutions like the NYSE, creating a window of opportunity before the NYSE's potential approval in late 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

On July 31, South Korean stocks staged a historic rebound. The benchmark KOSPI index surged 18.27%, with chipmaker SK Hynix hitting a 30% gain limit. This followed a brutal, near-40% decline in the KOSPI over the previous month, driven largely by a deleveraging spiral involving leveraged ETFs. Analysts attributed the sharp sell-off to structural liquidity issues rather than deteriorating corporate fundamentals. The rally was triggered by a confluence of positive catalysts. Firstly, strong earnings from U.S. cloud giants Microsoft and Amazon alleviated fears of an "AI bubble burst," boosting global tech sentiment. Secondly, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won made a rare personal purchase of SK Hynix shares, seen as a strong vote of confidence. Thirdly, the South Korean government announced a 20 trillion won ($139 billion) AI investment fund. In response to the market turmoil, South Korean regulators are tightening controls on leveraged ETFs, admitting oversight shortcomings. Measures include raising minimum cash保证金 requirements for散户 investors and suspending new product launches. While the rebound signals eased liquidity pressure, analysts note deep structural issues remain. The market's future stability is seen as dependent on global tech capital expenditure trends and memory chip price cycles, with some viewing the surge as a technical correction rather than a definitive trend reversal.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar F

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Synfutures (F) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Synfutures (F) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Synfutures (F)Después de comprar tu Synfutures (F), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Synfutures (F)Tradear fácilmente con Synfutures (F) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

242 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.21Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar F

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de F (F).

活动图片