Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-21Actualizado a 2026-04-21

Resumen

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round and soaring valuation of $15 billion highlight the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume reaching $25.7 billion in March 2026—a 10.6% monthly increase. This analysis argues that prediction markets serve critical non-speculative functions, positioning them as essential tools rather than mere gambling platforms. Prediction markets offer four unique values: entertainment consumption, insurance-like protection, risk hedging, and truth discovery. Firstly, they stimulate economic activity by engaging users in event-based betting, similar to the broader sports industry. Secondly, they act as a form of decentralized insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) transparently and without traditional overhead costs. Thirdly, institutions and individuals use these markets to hedge against geopolitical and commodity price risks, as demonstrated during the U.S.-Iran conflict and the launch of 24/7 commodity markets on platforms like Kalshi. Finally, prediction markets counter media bias by aggregating crowd-sourced information, often achieving 30% higher accuracy than surveys due to users' vested interests. Experts like Bitwise’s Jeff Park and SIG’s Jeff Yass emphasize the markets' role in risk transfer and financial innovation. As these platforms evolve, they are poised to become trillion-dollar markets, offering more reliable, decentralized mechanisms for information pri...

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Recently, Polymarket completed a $4 billion financing round, with its valuation growing to $15 billion. According to statistics, the nominal trading volume of prediction markets reached $25.7 billion in March 2026, a 10.6% increase compared to $23.2 billion in February 2026; while in October last year, this figure was only $8.7 billion. As the crypto market fluctuates with macroeconomic changes and regional conflicts, prediction markets have become the most eye-catching sector in the crypto space. With prediction market trading volume still maintaining rapid growth, combined with Odaily's previous article "Why Prediction Markets Are Truly Not Gambling Platforms," it might be time to discuss the unique value of prediction markets to set the record straight.

The Unique Value of Prediction Markets: Entertainment Consumption, Insurance Value, Risk Hedging, Truth Machine

What inspired the author to view prediction markets from the perspective of "non-gambling value" was a post titled "Most People's Misunderstandings About Prediction Markets" published yesterday by Bitwise advisor Jeff Park.

In this lengthy article of several thousand words, Jeff Park pointed out the similarities and differences between prediction markets, stock selection, and poker games, and positively affirmed the entertainment consumption attributes, financial innovation attributes, and precise information attributes of prediction markets.

If the article "Why Prediction Markets Are Truly Not Gambling Platforms" provided a detailed comparative analysis of prediction markets and gambling platforms from the perspectives of price mechanisms, usage differences, user structure, and regulatory logic, then what we aim to clarify today with this article is their diverse value.

Entertainment Consumption Stimulates Economic Development

In "The Theory of the Leisure Class," American economist Thorstein Veblen believed that the essence of the leisure class is not simply enjoying leisure but using freedom from labor and the squandering of wealth as a symbolic system to gain prestige. The so-called alienation of people by capitalism through money is precisely completed in various types of consumption.

However, the value of consumption is also evident today.

In a modern society with a clear division of labor, consumption is a necessary process of value exchange, and entertainment itself is a form of economic consumption and one of the life pursuits that distinguish humans from machines. Taking the sports industry alone, its overall output value is at the scale of $1 trillion; taking the sports brand NIKE as an example, on one hand, they earn profits by controlling the supply chain, manufacturing goods, and completing sales; on the other hand, they are shaping the sports industry in reverse through sponsoring teams, endorsements, sports events, etc. Based on the actual performance of various sports events and athletes in reality, betting in prediction markets is also a form of entertainment that stimulates spiritual consumption, and this in turn affects the attention of prediction market users and the general public to sports events, consumption of sports brands, and expenditure on spiritual recreation.

Limited Insurance Protects Personal Interests

As Jeff Park pointed out in his article "Most People's Misunderstandings About Prediction Markets": "The value of derivatives lies in allowing risk transfer, which means speculators are on the side of insurance institutions (Odaily Planet Daily Note: i.e., the insured transfers the uncertainty risk to risk-bearing speculators in exchange for确定性 costs). But the reality is that government intervention distorts the true market price for insurance holders, leading to insurance default behaviors. Without government intervention, there is no other way to achieve risk transfer in a transparent and open market."

In this regard, the two major advantages of prediction markets区别于常规衍生品 are highlighted: first, the event precision of prediction markets; second, the limited duration of prediction markets. The former means that a prediction market is a binary, well-defined proposition with no room for模糊 loss estimation, and settlement conditions are completely transparent and verifiable; the latter clarifies that the outcome of a prediction market is not an artificially set contract期限.

Furthermore, as SIG founder (Kalshi's official market maker institution) Jeff Yass mentioned in a previous interview: "To some extent, prediction markets play the role of 'new insurance.' In hurricane-prone Florida where there are insurance price caps, users can完全可以 use the betting event 'Will the wind speed in this area exceed 80 miles per hour?' in the weather market of prediction markets for反向投保. This channel also省去了 the complex links such as claims, operations, and marketing costs in traditional insurance."

In summary, prediction markets can provide participants with cost-clear, fact-following保障价值 for well-defined betting events.

Risk Hedging Responds to Event Crises

Not long ago, Kalshi announced the official launch of a 24/7 commodity market, providing price prediction services for包括 crude oil, diesel, gold, silver, copper, lithium, natural gas, sugar, soybeans, wheat, corn, coffee, cocoa, live cattle, and other commodities.

Citadel Securities President Jim Esposito also stated at the recent Washington Semafor World Economic Forum that the company might provide liquidity for prediction markets, but compared to sports events, they value the role of prediction markets in geopolitical risk hedging more. Taking the US midterm elections in November this year as an example, he said this event would be "one of the biggest risks facing investors' portfolios," and prediction markets will become a new tool for institutions to hedge risks.

From this perspective, investors can achieve risk hedging by holding "NO" related chips in events on prediction markets, enabling them to more flexibly respond to risks such as commodity price fluctuations and changes in the economic situation.结合 the surge in trading volume in the political situation sector since the US-Iran conflict began on February 28, prediction markets are already acting as risk hedging tools for individuals and institutions.

Truth Revelation Responds to Media Bias

In addition to the above values, from the perspective of information pricing, the role of prediction markets in应对大众媒体的议程设置 and media bias cannot be ignored.

American writer and media editor Ashley Rindsberg, in his book "The Gray Lady Winks: How the New York Times's Misreporting, Distortions, and Fabrications Radically Alter History," provided a detailed梳理 of the negative impact of the New York Times in many historical events, listing numerous institutional failures in recent decades, including the Duranty suppression of the Stalin famine in Cuba, Castro's sudden rise, Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, and the systemic softening of Hitler's rise. In these historical events, the New York Times, due to information channels, ideology, and institutional self-protection purposes, blurred the pursuit of truth about the events, ultimately leading to a series of negative consequences.

Although the judgment rules for many events in prediction markets still highly rely on media, with the development of industry platforms, the acceleration of information transmission speed, and the expansion of the传播广度 of event contracts, prediction markets are expected to become true truth machines to应对 media bias caused by factors such as staff personal preferences, workflow, ideology, and platform interests.

Previously, Crypto.com COO Ericnode stated that prediction markets could become a trillion-dollar market because users have切身利益, and their accuracy can be 30% higher than surveys.

In the near future, the roles prediction markets play, the functions they perform, and the value they can achieve are far more than we previously imagined.

Recommended Reading:

Most People's Misunderstandings About Prediction Markets

Why Prediction Markets Are Truly Not Gambling Platforms

SIG Founder Jeff Yass Talks About the Value of Prediction Markets

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the four unique values of prediction markets mentioned in the article?

AThe four unique values of prediction markets are entertainment consumption, insurance value, risk hedging, and truth revelation (acting as a truth machine).

QHow do prediction markets provide insurance value according to the article?

APrediction markets offer insurance value by allowing risk transfer in a transparent, open market without government intervention. They provide cost-effective, fact-based coverage for well-defined events, eliminating complex processes like claims and marketing found in traditional insurance.

QWhy are prediction markets considered effective tool for risk hedging?

APrediction markets enable flexible risk hedging against events like commodity price fluctuations, economic changes, and geopolitical risks. Investors can hold 'NO' positions in event contracts to mitigate potential losses from adverse outcomes.

QHow can prediction markets counteract media bias as stated in the article?

APrediction markets can counteract media bias by aggregating crowd-sourced information with financial stakes, leading to higher accuracy (reportedly 30% more accurate than surveys). They reduce reliance on potentially biased media narratives by providing decentralized, interest-driven truth assessment.

QWhat example did Jeff Yass give to illustrate the insurance function of prediction markets?

AJeff Yass cited the example of using prediction markets for reverse insurance in hurricane-prone Florida: users could bet on events like 'whether wind speed in their area exceeds 80 miles per hour' to hedge against storm damage, bypassing traditional insurance complexities.

Lecturas Relacionadas

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

743 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar 4

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).

活动图片