North Korea steals $2.8B in 2 years – Here’s what U.S. Treasury wants to do

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-09Actualizado a 2026-03-09

Resumen

The U.S. Treasury is intensifying efforts to combat illicit financial activities involving digital assets, as highlighted in a report under the GENIUS Act. The study identifies significant risks, particularly with stablecoins, which accounted for 84% of illicit crypto transactions in 2025. The Treasury recommends enhanced monitoring using AI and real-time blockchain analytics, and proposes treating major stablecoin issuers like regulated financial institutions. The report also underscores growing threats from state-backed actors, notably North Korea, which stole an estimated $2.8 billion in crypto over two years to fund weapons programs. These findings support legislative push for acts like the CLARITY Act to establish clearer regulatory frameworks for digital assets.

As digital asset adoption grows, regulators are increasing efforts to prevent illicit financial activity, and in this U.S. Treasury has made a bold move.

Under the GENIUS Act, the U.S. Treasury was tasked with studying tools to detect illicit activity involving digital assets. As a part of the process, the Treasury reviewed industry feedback and examined technologies such as AI, digital identity, blockchain analytics, and APIs.

In this, they also found the risks linked to digital assets. These included the misuse of mixers, distributed ledgers, and DeFi, while outlining measures to combat illicit crypto finance.

Stablecoins take centre stage from a regulatory point of view

Seeing such setbacks, the report calls for stronger monitoring of the crypto ecosystem, particularly stablecoins. Treasury data shows stablecoins accounted for about 84% of illicit crypto transaction volume in 2025, making them a key focus for regulators.

To address this risk, the Treasury proposes AI-powered monitoring tools and real-time blockchain analytics to track transactions involving unhosted wallets and decentralized platforms.

Under this framework, major stablecoin issuers could be treated more like regulated financial institutions with stricter compliance requirements.

Remarking on the same, Galaxy Research Head Alex Thorn also weighed in,

Rising criminal and state-backed threats

Beyond regulation, the report also highlighted the growing scale of cybercrime and state-backed activity in the crypto sector.

One major concern came from North Korea, which emerged as one of the most aggressive cyber actors targeting the industry.

Using advanced hacking and social engineering tactics, North Korean groups stole $1.5 billion in crypto in early 2025, bringing their estimated total to $2.8 billion over the past two years, reportedly used to fund weapons programs.

At the same time, online scams are also expanding rapidly.

This highlights how the Treasury’s findings are closely tied to the proposed CLARITY Act, which aims to create clearer regulatory rules for digital assets rather than forcing crypto into traditional banking frameworks.

The need for tighter oversight

Additionally, the 2026 Chainalysis report recently highlighted how sanctioned entities moved around $104 billion through cryptocurrency in 2025, representing a massive 694% increase from the previous year.

Together, these findings deepen the Treasury’s concerns and may push lawmakers toward advancing legislation like the CLARITY Act.


Final Summary

  • With stablecoins linked to a large share of illicit transactions, regulators are prioritizing stricter oversight of issuers and transaction flows.
  • North Korean hacks, global scams, and sanctions evasion highlight how crypto is increasingly tied to international security concerns.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片