No Holiday Break|What Have Crypto KOLs Been Talking About in the Last 24 Hours?

比推Publicado a 2026-02-18Actualizado a 2026-02-18

Resumen

This article summarizes discussions from crypto KOLs on X (formerly Twitter) over the past 24 hours during the Chinese New Year period. Key topics include: - Reflections on the Spring Festival and the growing role of AI, especially its prominence in the Spring Festival Gala. - Kraken Exchange launching an official Chinese account, with executives greeting the community in Chinese. - An analysis of the evolution of crypto listing cycles, arguing that "narratives are dead, utility prevails." The piece discusses different eras—from early chaos, to IEOs, the rise of Airdrops, and the current balance between VCs, projects, and retail. He Yi from Binance commented on the industry’s maturation and shifting dynamics. - Market sentiment discussions, noting that in a bull market, even unrelated news is seen as positive, while in bear markets, all news is perceived negatively. Some expect Bitcoin to consolidate around $60k–$70k for a while. - Humorous community comments about Justin Sun (often referred to as "Sun Ge" or "Sun Cut"), poking fun at his reputation and anecdotal stories. The article includes multiple screenshots of tweets and disclaims that the opinions expressed are personal and not investment advice.

Dear readers, may the Year of the Horse bring you great fortune!

This Bingwu Spring Festival, we wish you: ever-rising portfolios, a mindset as steady as a galloping horse, and profits racing like a track sprint!

Let’s take a look at what KOLs in the crypto space have been hotly discussing over the past 24 hours—

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform, representing personal opinions only. It does not represent the stance of this platform and should not be considered investment advice.

New Year Reflections, and When AI Takes Center Stage at the Spring Festival Gala

Kraken Exchange Launches Chinese Account, Executives Extend New Year Greetings in Chinese

The Evolution of Listing Cycles: “Narratives Are Dead, Utility Reigns”

Article link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7612622

Author’s note: “As an old-timer in crypto who’s anti-VC, this sentiment really resonates with us—do you know how long it took for the crypto community to reclaim pricing power? So today, from the perspective of a seasoned veteran, I’ve strung together these phases to help newcomers understand the journey. This is a hearty dish for you to savor during boring family visits or while traveling. It’s worth reading again and again.”

He Yi’s repost comment:

“From an exchange’s perspective, the first phase was the wild west era where many projects cashed out and left. Binance began restricting investors & project teams from unlocking tokens based on milestones or timelines.

The second IEO era emerged because liquidity was concentrated, giving Binance more leverage to advise projects on low-price TGEs to benefit retail investors, without charging listing fees—a win-win logic. Coupled with the bear market introducing longs, shorts, and leverage, this became the ‘golden age’ everyone reminisces about.

The third era saw AMMs revolutionize DEXs, the rise of VCs, and the professionalization of industry KOLs and institutions. This diluted CEXs’ pricing power and introduced compliance standards, leading to airdrops.

The fourth era is marked by further institutional professionalization among players. Exchanges evolved from early curation to CEXs integrating wallets and enabling trading of any on-chain token, giving rise to ‘the eggs every generation must claim’—Alpha, intended to balance VC & institutional, project, and retail interests.

For any emerging industry, it’s a process of feeling our way forward. Most people lack faith in the industry’s long-term prospects, hence ‘not looking long-term.’ It’s like many don’t believe we can cross this river, but only those who believe can make it to the other shore.”

Market Discussions

Popular replies:

In a bear market, any news is bearish; in a bull market, even unrelated news is bullish;

When Bitcoin ETFs were approved, the price didn’t rise—it actually dropped from 44k to 38k, but later hit 120k. Probably now it’ll hover around 60k-70k for a long time;

It’s these positive factors that pushed it past 70k; otherwise, it would’ve dropped to 60k already.

The Charm of “Sun Studies”

Popular replies:

A joke: you think he’s just borrowing a pen, but when you look back, your wallet’s gone too. Then Brother Sun invites you to dinner under the pretext of returning it, and you end up losing the meal on top of it;

His never-miss-a-trick nature is etched in his genes;

I heard that last time Sun Cut was interviewed in Hong Kong, he pocketed two glass cups on his way out;

Original article link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7612688

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main topic discussed by crypto KOLs in the past 24 hours according to the article?

AThe main topics include Chinese New Year reflections, AI's role in the Spring Festival Gala, Kraken Exchange opening a Chinese account and executives greeting in Chinese, the evolution of token listing cycles, market discussions, and the 'charm of Sun Studies' (referring to Sun Yuchen's influence).

QWhich exchange opened a Chinese account and had executives send New Year greetings in Chinese?

AKraken Exchange opened a Chinese account and had its executives send New Year greetings in Chinese.

QWhat is the core argument in the 'Token Listing Cycle Evolution Theory' mentioned in the article?

AThe core argument is 'Narrative is dead, utility stands,' highlighting a shift from speculative narratives to practical utility in token listings, with insights into the industry's phases from wild growth to institutional professionalism.

QHow did the community react to market discussions, as per the popular replies in the article?

AThe community noted that in a bear market, any news is seen as negative, while in a bull market, even unrelated news is perceived as positive. They also discussed Bitcoin's price consolidation around $60,000-$70,000 after ETF approval.

QWhat is the community's humorous take on 'Sun Studies' (孙学) in the article?

AThe community humorously commented on Sun Yuchen's reputation, joking that he might take advantage of situations, such as 'taking wallets' or even pocketing glass cups after an interview, reflecting his opportunistic character.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片