NFL Returns to DraftKings and FanDuel, But Still Shuns Prediction Markets

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-29Actualizado a 2026-08-29

Resumen

The NFL has re-established sponsorship agreements with sports betting operators DraftKings, FanDuel, and Fanatics, granting them rights to league branding, events, and real-time data. However, the league is explicitly avoiding the prediction markets sector. The new partners have agreed to the NFL's integrity rules, which include bans on betting related to player injuries and officiating—a stance largely aligned with proposed CFTC regulations for prediction markets. NFL executive Renie Anderson stated the league is not commercially exploring prediction markets, citing integrity concerns. While platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket offer such products, the NFL's new data and IP deals do not extend to them. The league is reportedly lobbying the CFTC for stricter rules mirroring its sports betting integrity standards and has expressed concerns that injury-related markets are "easily manipulated and offensive." Although other major leagues like the NHL and MLB have partnered with prediction market platforms, the NFL is holding firm. Individual NFL franchises are reportedly interested in such deals but are currently prohibited from pursuing them. The agreements replace prior deals that expired in March after disputes over data pricing, with Genius Sports remaining the exclusive data distributor.

On August 27, the National Football League announced commercial agreements with DraftKings, FanDuel, and Fanatics Betting and Gaming, thereby reinstating a sponsorship category that had remained vacant since the end of March. All three companies signed multi-year deals, granting rights to use league branding, presence at the Super Bowl and the NFL Draft, as well as access to in-game live data feeds, Next Gen Stats, and BetVision via Genius Sports. Financial terms were not disclosed.

All three partners agreed to abide by the league's core integrity rules and to jointly work to 'prohibit bets that the league deems unacceptable, including those related to officiating and injuries, as well as those whose outcome may be known in advance or easily manipulated by a single person.' Renie Anderson, the league's executive vice president and chief revenue officer, stated that all three companies 'share our vision for fan innovation and engagement, but most importantly — our commitment to protecting the integrity and fairness of the game.'

This list largely aligns with the rules proposed for prediction markets by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The commission's message on June 10 regarding the proposed rules would permit standard sports contracts—on game winners, championship futures, and most of what currently trades—as serving the public interest. Contracts concerning player injuries, officiating decisions, specific in-play actions such as a particular pass or kick by a named player, physical altercations, and sub-collegiate level sports would be prohibited.

When asked about the prediction markets category, Anderson told ESPN: 'We are not commercially looking at that space at this time.' As reported by Front Office Sports, DraftKings, FanDuel, and Fanatics offer prediction market products; however, the data and intellectual property rights under the new agreements do not extend to them.

Sources told the publication that the league has been in negotiations for months with Kalshi, Polymarket, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to no avail, and no agreements will be in place by the season opener on September 9. 'I don't see a scenario where the NFL is ready for the start of the season,' said one source in the prediction markets industry. 'I'd be incredibly surprised if anything happens at all this season.'

A source familiar with the league's stance told FOS that the NFL is lobbying the commission for rules reflecting the integrity and consumer protection principles in place for legal sports betting and that the league is concerned about markets related to injuries, which it considers 'easily subject to manipulation and offensive' to players. In July, the league told the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that the commission's proposal fell significantly short on integrity, consumer protection, and manipulation prevention. Anderson also told ESPN that 'to have advertising in our games, you need to have official data, because you have to agree to our integrity requirements.'

Kalshi does not list markets explicitly tied to injuries but offers contracts on whether a given player will take the field—including on whether Patrick Mahomes, who tore his ACL in December, will play in Week 1. On August 25, Polymarket US self-certified a nearly identical product and delisted it the next day. Both exchanges have seats on the CFTC's Technology Advisory Committee, as does DraftKings CEO Jason Robbins.

Previous five-year agreements with FanDuel, DraftKings, and Caesars, collectively worth nearly $1 billion, expired on March 31 after negotiations with the two largest partners stalled over increased pricing for the official streaming data distributed through Genius Sports. Under the new agreements, Genius remains the league's exclusive data distribution partner and provides the real-time betting pattern monitoring that the league references in its integrity program.

Last October, the NHL entered partnerships with both Kalshi and Polymarket, and in March, MLB reached a deal with Polymarket, followed by individual clubs. Individual NFL franchises had expressed interest in securing their own deals, according to a source at a prediction markets company who told Front Office Sports that 'everyone wants to have a partner in this space,' but team-level deals are currently not permitted.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat announcement did the NFL make on August 27th, and with which companies?

AOn August 27th, the National Football League announced the signing of multiyear commercial agreements with DraftKings, FanDuel, and Fanatics Betting and Gaming.

QWhat did the league's new partners agree to regarding the integrity of the game?

AAll three partners agreed to adhere to the league's core integrity rules, working with the NFL to prohibit bets deemed impermissible by the league. This includes bets on officiating, player injuries, and events with a foreknown or easily manipulated outcome.

QAccording to the article, why did the NFL's previous deals with Fanduel, DraftKings, and Caesars expire?

AThe previous five-year deals, worth nearly $1 billion combined, expired on March 31st after negotiations with the two largest partners stalled over increased pricing for official streaming data distributed via Genius Sports.

QWhat is the NFL's current stance on prediction markets, and what are they lobbying the CFTC for?

AThe NFL stated it is not currently exploring prediction markets from a commercial perspective. The league is lobbying the CFTC for rules that would apply the integrity and consumer protection principles from the legal sports betting ecosystem to prediction markets.

QHow does the NFL's approach to prediction market partners differ from that of other major leagues mentioned in the article?

AUnlike the NHL (which partnered with Kalshi and Polymarket) and MLB (which partnered with Polymarket), the NFL has not entered league-wide agreements with prediction market platforms and is currently prohibiting its individual franchises from doing so.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

Ripple (XRP) has announced a four-phase plan to prepare the XRP Ledger (XRPL) for future security threats posed by quantum computers. The company's senior director of engineering stated the goal is to build necessary infrastructure before quantum computers become a direct threat, aiming to minimize impact on existing systems, user assets, and network operations. The plan begins with identifying potential quantum vulnerabilities within XRPL, followed by testing quantum-resistant cryptographic methods. The next phase involves parallel testing of existing security mechanisms and new quantum-resistant solutions to ensure reliability and prevent disruption for users and applications. The final phase would involve transitioning the XRPL to more comprehensive, quantum-resistant security standards if the technology matures. Ripple is also developing contingency plans for a faster-than-expected advancement of quantum computing, which could accelerate the transition timeline. A current XRPL feature allowing users to change the keys controlling their accounts without altering the accounts themselves is seen as a potential advantage in any future migration. However, Ripple cannot unilaterally change transaction validation rules or network-wide cryptographic standards; such updates require coordination and approval from independent validators via XRPL's governance process. While quantum computers are not yet capable of breaking the cryptography used by major blockchains like Bitcoin or XRPL, developers across the industry are already evaluating transition scenarios to quantum-resistant algorithms due to the long-term risks they pose to public-key cryptography.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片