New Capital Incentive Pathways Under the New System: The True Picture of Crypto Investment and Financing in 2025

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-01-05Actualizado a 2026-01-05

Resumen

"New Capital Incentive Paths Under New Regulations: The True Picture of Crypto Investment and Financing in 2025" In 2025, the cryptocurrency market achieved substantial regulatory breakthroughs, moving away from its wild growth phase and aligning more closely with mainstream finance. The global crypto market cap reached $3.2 trillion, while stablecoin transaction volumes surpassed $50 trillion, exceeding those of traditional payment giants like Visa and PayPal. This growth was underpinned by two key legislative developments: the enactment of stablecoin legislation, which provided clear legal frameworks for issuers and reserves, and the advancement of a crypto market structure bill, which established a classified regulatory approach. Despite these improvements, the secondary market remained volatile, with Bitcoin experiencing sharp price swings and altcoins performing weakly. In contrast, the primary market displayed a "cautiously active" stance, characterized by a significant shift in investment patterns. A review of the past four years shows a notable decoupling between funding rounds and amounts. In 2024, the number of financing events increased, but the total amount raised remained restrained. By 2025, this trend reversed: the number of deals declined significantly, but the total capital raised increased, with quarterly financing ranging between $3.7 billion and $5.1 billion. This indicates that investors are concentrating their bets on fewer, high-potential projects. ...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ding Dang (@XiaMiPP)

2025 is a year of substantial breakthroughs at the institutional level for the cryptocurrency market, and a year of gradual departure from wild growth and convergence towards the mainstream financial system. In terms of scale, the total global crypto asset market capitalization has reached $3.2 trillion, while stablecoin trading volume has exceeded $50 trillion—a figure far surpassing traditional payment giants like Visa and PayPal. Behind these numbers lies the support of two core legislative advancements.

First, stablecoin-related legislation has been formally enacted. The bill clarifies the issuing entities, reserve requirements, and regulatory mechanisms, providing a clear legal status for "on-chain dollars." This not only reduces policy uncertainty for stablecoin businesses but also directly stimulates investment and financing activity in stablecoin, payment, and settlement-related sectors. Second, the cryptocurrency market structure bill is steadily progressing, incorporating crypto assets into a classified regulatory framework to avoid a "one-size-fits-all" approach, providing project teams and investors with a predictable compliance path.

The combination of these two legislative advancements will, to some extent, reshape the primary market's assessment of risk and return.

However, in contrast to the improved institutional environment, the secondary market in 2025 did not respond with strong performance. Bitcoin prices fluctuated sharply, and altcoins performed weakly. Against this backdrop, the primary market did not exhibit the widespread frenzy seen in the previous bull market but instead showed a cautiously active态势, with明显的 changes in financing节奏 and preferences.

Four-Year "Cycle" Review: Two Instances of Divergence in Financing Count and Amount

Reviewing the trends in crypto financing over the past four years, the evolution of the relationship between the primary market and secondary market performance becomes clear.

Early 2022 still benefited from the residual heat of the bull market, with both the number of financing events and the amounts raised remaining high; subsequently, as Bitcoin entered a downward cycle, financing activity gradually萎缩. Between 2022 and 2023, investment and financing activities were highly correlated with price movements, remaining overall低迷 under bear market pressure.

2024 became a significant turning point, marking the first divergence between the amount raised and the number of deals.

This year, with the restart of the Bitcoin halving narrative, the number of financing events明显回暖, but the amount raised remained consistently克制. Quarterly financing规模 hovered in the range of $1.8 billion to $2.8 billion, even similar to levels during the bear market. The main reason was that during this period, the crypto market行情 was dominated by Bitcoin and the Meme sector, which stood in stark contrast to the performance of the previous cycle. In the previous cycle, VC-backed projects were often the core of market hotspots, whereas in 2024, VC projects overall performed低迷, struggling to substantially impact the market, which to some extent also抑制了大额融资的出现.

Entering 2025, the divergence phenomenon reappeared, but this time the direction reversed.

The number of financings saw a significant decline, but the amount raised began to回升. Quarterly financing规模 returned to the range of $3.7 billion to $5.1 billion. This means that the average financing size increased significantly; investors are actively reducing the number of investments and instead concentrating their bets on a few projects deemed to have certainty and scalability.

12 Sectors, $178.9 Billion: Structural Changes in the Primary Market

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily Planet Daily, the total primary market investment and financing in 2025 reached $178.9 billion, with a total of 569 financing events. To more accurately depict changes in financing preferences, we have categorized all disclosed financing projects (the actual close time is often earlier than the announcement) into 12 sectors based on business type, target audience, and business model dimensions. These include: CeFi, Infrastructure, RWA, AI, DeFi, SocialFi, Prediction Markets, PayFi, DePIN, BTCFi, L1, and GameFi.

Looking at the financing situation in细分 sectors:

CeFi and Infrastructure ranked at the top in terms of both financing amount and number of deals. Underlying capabilities such as trading, custody, clearing, security, and cross-chain remain key areas for continuous capital investment. The market consensus on "infrastructure first" has not wavered.
DeFi projects continue to maintain high activity levels. The market still has high demand for innovation in new DeFi protocols, especially as the success of Hyperliquid directly demonstrated to the market that decentralized exchanges can also effectively handle large-scale capital inflows. Perp DEX has become a new financing hotspot.
AI and RWA have become new narrative pillars. The former aligns with the main theme of the global tech cycle, while the latter directly benefits from the institutional红利 of tokenizing traditional financial assets. Both paths share a common characteristic: their growth logic no longer relies entirely on the crypto-native market but extends into the broader tech and traditional financial systems.
The real dark horse is the Prediction Market sector. Although the number of projects in this sector is not particularly突出 compared to others, the amount raised jumped to become the second-largest sector,仅次于 infrastructure. This indicates that capital is being高度集中地押注 on a few leading projects.
In contrast, once-hot sectors like DePIN and GameFi, while still seeing many projects emerge, have experienced a sharp decline in financing appeal, as capital shifts towards areas with greater certainty and economies of scale.

Overall, the primary market is shifting from "casting a wide net" to "intensive cultivation."

Polymarket: Consensus Changes Behind the Top Financing of 2025

From the list of Top 10 financing amounts in 2025, it can be seen that Polymarket and Kalshi almost constitute the entire narrative of 2025 financing.

Among them, Polymarket has completed nearly $2.5 billion in multiple rounds of financing, with investors including知名加密风投 funds like Polychain, Dragonfly, and Coinbase; Kalshi began to gain momentum in 2025, completing approximately $1.5 billion in financing, supported by Paradigm, a16z, and Coinbase. Unlike Polymarket, Kalshi emphasizes compliance with federal regulation. However, what they share is that prediction markets are being viewed as a financial form with real demand and have now become the most vibrant and positively trending sector.

In the L1 sector, capital preferences similarly persist. On the list, besides the established public chain Ripple, others like Tempo and Mond are new-generation projects. Among them, Mond has already issued tokens, while Tempo has not. This reflects investors' continued investment in underlying infrastructure, with high-performance L1s still seen as the long-term cornerstone for ecosystem expansion.

Conclusion

Overall, the primary market in 2025 did not cool down but is undergoing active convergence and restructuring.

Capital is still flowing, but it is no longer chasing quantity; instead, it is being allocated集中 around certainty, compliance, and scalability potential. This change does not necessarily mean fewer opportunities but may instead signal that the crypto market is entering a more rational and mature stage.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the two key legislative developments that supported the growth of the cryptocurrency market in 2025?

AThe two key legislative developments were the formal enactment of the stablecoin-related bill, which provided a clear legal framework for 'on-chain dollars,' and the steady advancement of the cryptocurrency market structure bill, which incorporated crypto assets into a classified regulatory framework.

QHow did the trend of financing events and amounts change from 2024 to 2025?

AIn 2024, there was a first divergence where the number of financing events increased significantly, but the total amount raised remained restrained. In 2025, a second divergence occurred in the opposite direction: the number of financing events dropped significantly, but the total amount of financing increased, indicating a rise in the average deal size as investors concentrated their bets on fewer projects.

QWhich two sectors emerged as new narrative focal points in the 2025 crypto funding landscape, and what was their common characteristic?

AAI and RWA (Real World Assets) emerged as new narrative focal points. Their common characteristic was that their growth logic no longer relied entirely on the crypto-native market but extended into the broader technology and traditional financial systems.

QWhich sector, despite having a relatively low number of projects, saw a massive concentration of funding, becoming the second-largest sector by amount raised?

AThe prediction market sector, with projects like Polymarket and Kalshi, saw a massive concentration of funding, making it the second-largest sector by amount raised, just behind infrastructure.

QWhat overall shift in investment strategy does the 2025 crypto venture capital market represent?

AThe market shifted from a 'wide net' strategy of numerous small bets to a 'precision cultivation' strategy, where capital is concentrated and allocated around projects with regulatory clarity, certainty, and potential for scale, indicating a move towards a more rational and mature stage.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 7 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 7 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 11 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros