Nearly $300 Million Aimed at U.S. Midterm Elections, Tether Executive Takes Helm of Crypto Industry's Second-Largest Political Fund

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-03Actualizado a 2026-04-03

Resumen

A crypto super PAC named Fellowship, which claims to have raised over $100 million but has reported zero spending to the FEC, has appointed Jesse Spiro, Tether’s VP of Regulatory Affairs, as its chairman. This marks the first official public link between Tether and the PAC, despite earlier denials. Meanwhile, another major crypto PAC, Fairshake—backed by Coinbase, Ripple, and a16z—has amassed $193 million and has already spent over $8.6 million in Illinois primary races. Combined, the two PACs control nearly $300 million aimed at influencing the November midterm elections. The move comes as the crypto industry faces a critical legislative battle over the CLARITY Act, currently stalled in the Senate. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins can pay yields to users—a issue directly affecting Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT. A recent Senate proposal would ban passive yield but allow transaction-based rewards, a compromise the industry finds too restrictive. With the White House’s top crypto advocate departing and the legislative window narrowing, Tether’s heightened political engagement signals a strategic push to shape regulation and protect its business interests through financial influence.

Deep Tide Guide: Fellowship, a crypto super PAC that was established seven months ago and claimed to have raised over $100 million but has yet to spend a single dollar, announced on Wednesday the appointment of Jesse Spiro, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Tether US, as its chairman. This marks the first official and public connection between Tether and the PAC. Meanwhile, another major crypto PAC, Fairshake, has amassed a war chest of $193 million. Combined, the two PACs are targeting the November midterm elections with nearly $300 million in political funds, while legislative battles over stablecoin yields in Congress remain unresolved.

The political arms race in the crypto industry is escalating.

According to a Cointelegraph report on April 1, Fellowship PAC announced on Wednesday that Jesse Spiro, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Tether US, will assume the role of chairman, leading the organization's next phase of expansion. The first list of endorsed candidates will be announced in the coming days. Fellowship is a super PAC founded in August 2025, which claimed last September that it had raised "over $100 million" from unnamed donors aligned with the crypto industry.

Spiro stated in a declaration: "This is a critical moment for American innovation. We have the opportunity to ensure that the United States continues to be the global hub for builders, entrepreneurs, and technological progress. Fellowship PAC is committed to supporting leaders who understand what is at stake and are willing to take action."

From 'Denying Ties' to 'Executive Leadership': Tether's Relationship with Fellowship Comes to Light

Since its high-profile debut last September, the identity of Fellowship PAC's backers has been one of the industry's biggest mysteries.

At its inception, the PAC did not disclose any management, donors, or key employees. Early reports listed Tether as an expected supporter, but Tether International subsequently formally denied any connection to the PAC. According to a CoinDesk report in February, a Tether International spokesperson explicitly stated that "Tether International has no affiliation whatsoever with Fellowship."

But FEC records tell a different story. Fellowship's registered treasurer, Mitchell Nobel, is an executive at Cantor Fitzgerald, the custodian institution managing Tether's multi-billion dollar reserves. The PAC's registered address is in Bethesda, Maryland.

Now, with a current Tether US executive officially taking the helm as PAC chairman, the previous rumors have finally solidified into public record. According to BeInCrypto, this marks the first formal, public connection between Fellowship PAC and Tether officially.

Spiro joined Tether in 2024 as Head of Government Affairs. Prior to that, he was responsible for blockchain and digital asset regulatory relations at PayPal and held a leadership role in government affairs at the on-chain analytics company Chainalysis.

$100 Million 'War Chest' Yet to Fire a Single Shot, FEC Records Show Zero Expenditures

Despite Fellowship's assertion of holding $100 million in funds, FEC records show that as of December 31 last year, the PAC reported no donation income or expenditures. Since last September's announcement, Fellowship has only made three public statements on platform X, operating almost "invisibly."

This contrast has raised widespread questions. CoinDesk's investigative report on February 25 pointed out that Fellowship had "never shown up" in its seven months of existence, with its promised $100 million showing no trace in Federal Election Commission disclosures.

Spiro's appointment is seen as a signal of Fellowship's return to the public eye from its period of dormancy. The PAC stated it will announce its first endorsements of candidates in the coming days, with just over seven months remaining until the November midterm elections.

Bo Hines, Executive Director of the White House Digital Asset Advisory Council, expressed support for the appointment on platform X, posting: "The fight for American innovation needs serious advocates. Looking forward to seeing leaders who truly understand the stakes get elected."

Crypto PAC Arms Race: Fairshake Holds $193 Million, Already Spent $8.6 Million in Illinois

Fellowship is not the crypto industry's only political funding machine. The Fairshake PAC and its affiliated organizations, backed by Coinbase, Ripple, and a16z, reported holding $193 million in cash as of January this year, making it the crypto industry's largest super PAC by funding size.

Fairshake has already begun taking action. According to Cointelegraph, the PAC and its affiliates have spent approximately $8.6 million on a congressional race in Illinois, six times its spending in the state in 2024. In the Illinois primary in March, some candidates supported by Fairshake did not win, but there is still a seven-month window until the midterm elections.

During the 2024 election cycle, Fairshake spent over $130 million on media placements, with the majority of the more than 50 candidates it supported successfully elected. According to statistics from the non-profit oversight organization Public Citizen, nearly half of the corporate money flowing into the 2024 elections came from the crypto industry.

Now, with the combined war chest of nearly $300 million from Fellowship and Fairshake, plus other political donation forces in the crypto industry, the 2026 midterm elections are expected to set a new record for industry political spending.

Legislative Battle: Stablecoin Yield Dispute Stalls CLARITY Act, Tether's Interests at Stake

Spiro's appointment is not coincidental in its timing. The Clarity Act for Digital Asset Markets (CLARITY Act), the crypto industry's core legislative priority, is currently stalled in the Senate, with one of the contentious points being stablecoin yields, which directly impacts Tether's business model.

The CLARITY Act passed the House of Representatives in July 2025 by a vote of 294 to 134 and passed review in the Senate Agriculture Committee in January this year. However, at the Senate Banking Committee level, a fierce battle is underway between the banking industry and the crypto industry over whether stablecoins can pay yields to users.

On March 20, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks reached a principled compromise on stablecoin yields: prohibiting passive yield payments based on holding balances, but allowing reward programs based on transaction activity. According to CoinDesk, after crypto industry representatives reviewed the latest text behind closed doors on Capitol Hill on March 23, they found the language too narrow and ambiguous. Coinbase has stated twice that it does not support the current draft.

The markup in the Senate Banking Committee is currently scheduled for after the Easter recess in late April. Senator Bernie Moreno warned that if the bill does not advance by May, crypto legislation may not receive serious consideration again during the midterm election cycle.

Compounding the issue, the White House AI and Crypto Tsar, David Sacks, confirmed on March 26 that his 130-day term had expired and the administration would not appoint a successor. The crypto industry's most critical legislative sprint will proceed without its chief advocate in the White House.

Tether's USDT is the world's largest stablecoin, with a market cap of approximately $184 billion, but it is not available to U.S. residents. Tether launched a compliant stablecoin for the U.S. market, USAT, last year. The final outcome of the stablecoin yield provisions will directly determine the operating space for Tether and its competitors in the U.S. market.

Against this backdrop, by having an executive assume the chairmanship of the PAC, Tether is pushing its political influence building from behind the scenes to the forefront, sending a clear signal: during the critical window of legislative博弈 (game/struggle), using political funds to protect industry interests.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho was appointed as the new chairman of the crypto super PAC Fellowship, and what is his role at Tether?

AJesse Spiro, the Regulatory Affairs Vice President of Tether US, was appointed as the chairman of Fellowship PAC.

QHow much combined political funding do Fellowship and Fairshake PACs have for the midterm elections, and what are their reported amounts?

AFellowship and Fairshake PACs have a combined nearly $300 million in political funds, with Fellowship claiming over $100 million and Fairshake holding $193 million.

QWhat discrepancy was reported regarding Fellowship PAC's fundraising claims and FEC records?

AFellowship PAC claimed to have raised over $100 million, but FEC records showed zero reported donations or expenditures as of December 31.

QWhat is the key legislative issue affecting stablecoins like Tether's USDT, and what is the compromise proposed in the CLARITY Act?

AThe key issue is whether stablecoins can pay yields to users. The proposed compromise in the CLARITY Act prohibits passive yield based on holdings but allows reward programs based on transaction activity.

QWhy is Jesse Spiro's appointment significant for Tether and the crypto industry's political strategy?

AIt marks the first formal, public link between Tether and Fellowship PAC, signaling Tether's move to openly influence politics during a critical legislative period for crypto regulations, particularly affecting stablecoin operations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

On June 5th, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox disclosed a critical soundness vulnerability in the project's latest Orchard privacy pool. This flaw, found in the elliptic curve multiplication constraints, could allow an attacker to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC within the shielded pool, with transactions appearing valid. The vulnerability was discovered in late May by security researcher Taylor Hornby, who utilized Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 AI model for a targeted audit. The Zcash ecosystem had already performed an emergency network upgrade to patch the issue. However, the detailed disclosure triggered severe market panic, causing ZEC's price to plummet over 30% in a single day. Notably, prominent investor Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire ZEC position following the news. The incident starkly challenges the "technological trust" narrative central to privacy coins. Despite years of top-tier cryptographic audits, the bug persisted until uncovered with advanced AI-assisted research. This highlights the growing gap between theoretical perfection and practical implementation in privacy technology. The event serves as a industry-wide warning: in an AI-driven security landscape, the assumption that "undiscovered equals safe" is obsolete. It underscores the urgent need for continuous, proactive security practices combining AI audits, formal verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

foresightnews_apiHace 58 min(s)

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

foresightnews_apiHace 58 min(s)

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

**Vitalik Buterin Proposes New DeFi Design to Eliminate Forced Liquidations** Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has published a proposal for a new decentralized finance (DeFi) architecture aimed at removing the automatic liquidation mechanisms prevalent in current lending protocols. The core idea involves creating synthetic assets using options as building blocks, fundamentally avoiding the抵押借贷结构 that triggers forced sell-offs. The proposal responds to a recurring flaw in DeFi: during sharp market downturns, mass自动清算 of under-collateralized positions can exacerbate price declines, creating systemic selling pressure and market instability, as evidenced by recent crypto market volatility. Buterin's model would split an asset like 1 ETH into two option-like derivatives, P and N, pegged to a price index with a set strike price and expiration. At expiry, an oracle determines the settlement price to allocate the underlying ETH between P and N holders. This design eliminates the "cliff" of instant liquidation. Instead, a position's value would gradually drift from its target peg if not actively rebalanced by the user, transferring the rebalancing decision from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on high-frequency, real-time oracle price feeds, which are vulnerable to manipulation and errors in current systems. The delayed settlement in the options model allows for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. However, significant challenges remain for practical adoption. High transaction costs (slippage) from frequent rebalancing on automated market makers (AMMs) could erode user funds. The model may not be suitable for stablecoins requiring a strict 1:1 dollar peg, as it inherently allows for value drift. Success would depend on developing new liquidity provisioning models and deep markets for these synthetic assets. The proposal represents a fundamental rethinking of DeFi risk management, challenging the industry to explore alternatives to被动集中平仓 rather than merely optimizing existing liquidation processes. It remains a theoretical framework awaiting implementation and testing by development teams.