NEAR Protocol analysis – Why another 34% drawdown is likely for its price

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-18Actualizado a 2025-12-18

Resumen

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) has declined significantly, losing 11.38% over the past week and 5.74% in the last 24 hours, largely influenced by Bitcoin's high volatility and subsequent drop. Despite a brief surge in Open Interest and bullish Futures data earlier in the week, the momentum was not sustained. NEAR broke below its long-term support level of $1.72 and the $1.82–$3.38 range it had traded in since March, with the weekly close at $1.59 confirming the breakdown. Both the RSI and OBV indicators show strong bearish momentum, indicating dominant selling pressure. A further decline toward the $0.97 support level is likely. A daily close above $1.82 would be needed to shift the bias. Traders are advised to consider shorting on any bounce to the $1.7–$1.8 supply zone, with invalidation above $1.82.

NEAR Protocol [NEAR] has lost 11.38% of its value over the past week, with the altcoin falling by 5.74% in the last 24 hours. The day’s losses came after high volatility on Wednesday, with Bitcoin briefly rallying to $90.2k before plunging immediately to the local support of $85.7k.

This 5.6% Bitcoin [BTC] drop has shaken market sentiment, which was already fearful. This meant that NEAR traders needed to be bearishly biased.

They could have had positive expectations for the week after seeing the Futures data on Monday. There was a 13.1% Open Interest surge, from $122 million to $138 million, and an uptick in spot buying volume.

The Futures funding rate also rose to show short-term bullish sentiment, according to Coinalyze data. This short-term impetus was not sustained, however. Hence, the question – What should traders expect next?

The failure of the long-term range, and its implications

Since March, NEAR Protocol’s token has traded within a range (yellow) that extended from $1.82 to $3.38. The second week of December saw NEAR close a weekly session at $1.59. This was well below the $1.82 range low and the long-term support at $1.72.

The sliding OBV underlined steady sell volume, with the RSI capturing the downward momentum of the altcoin.

The 1-day chart reinforced the bearish trend’s strength. Since the second week of November, the OBV and RSI have both been falling. This reinforced the idea that sellers have been dominant.

The price action revealed that the $1.82-level was retested as resistance, but sellers held up well, not allowing bulls to climb any higher. A few days of consolidation around $1.8 were followed by a NEAR decline.

Is a bullish reversal possible for NEAR from here?

Based on the evidence at hand, a bullish move is highly unlikely. The long-term trend and short-term volatility are likely to send NEAR lower, towards the $0.97 long-term support.

A move back above $1.82 is needed to flip the bias bullishly for NEAR.

Traders’ call to action – Should you sell now or wait for a bounce?

Traders looking to go short need not FOMO after seeing NEAR’s descent in recent days. The price might bounce to the $1.7-$1.8 supply zone that precipitated the current bearish impulse move.

Such a retest would offer a short-selling opportunity, with invalidation being a daily session close above $1.82.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s sudden price moves have increased selling pressure across the altcoin market, bearishly affecting tokens such as NEAR.
  • The failure of the long-term range and $1.72 support meant that a move to $1 is likely.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手Hace 50 min(s)

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手Hace 50 min(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar NEAR

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar NEAR Protocol (NEAR) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar NEAR Protocol (NEAR) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu NEAR Protocol (NEAR)Después de comprar tu NEAR Protocol (NEAR), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear NEAR Protocol (NEAR)Tradear fácilmente con NEAR Protocol (NEAR) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

355 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar NEAR

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de NEAR (NEAR).

活动图片