Nasdaq and CME Rebrand Joint Crypto Index to Expand Exposure

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-10Actualizado a 2026-01-10

Resumen

Nasdaq and CME Group have rebranded their joint crypto index to the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index, deepening their long-standing collaboration. The updated index serves as a benchmark for investors seeking diversified exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies, reflecting growing regulatory clarity and institutional participation. It tracks multiple cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano, and Avalanche, representing a broader market view rather than a Bitcoin-centric approach. The index emphasizes governance, transparency, and institutional risk compliance, with eligibility rules, liquidity thresholds, and quarterly rebalancing. This initiative builds on the decades-long partnership between Nasdaq and CME, which began with Nasdaq-100 futures in the 1990s.

Nasdaq and CME Group have collaborated on their crypto indexing efforts under the same roof, renewing the Nasdaq Crypto Index as the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index. The step has helped in deepening the collaboration between the two market infrastructure providers that dates back around three decades, as per Nasdaq.

The revised index is made to act as the base benchmark for investors looking for exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies, as regulatory clarity and institutional participation continuously expand.

The executive director of equity and alternative products at CME Group, Giovanni, revealed that this is not only a name change. He further explained that the index is an amalgamation of two established market standards targeting the delivery of governance and diversification as compared to the traditional asset classes.

The Further Update

The Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index keeps track of the majority of virtual assets, adding BTC, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano and Avalanche. Nasdaq further revealed that the index is made to show the wider crypto market instead of concentrating completely on Bitcoin, a shift that shows how investors approach equities and other asset classes.

The head of index product management at Nasdaq, Sean Wasserman, revealed investors are growing towards index-based exposure as the crypto market seems more complex. He also said that we witness the index-based approach as the direction investors are moving, beyond only BTC.

Governance and transparency are at the core of the index’s structure. The benchmark is an estimation of CF Benchmarks and overlooked by a joint governance committee, having eligibility rules, liquidity thresholds, and quarterly rebalancing highlighted in a published methodology.

The officials stated this substructure is made to line up with institutional risk and compliance anticipations. The rollout also builds on Nasdaq and CME Group’s long history of partnership, which started with Nasdaq-100 futures in the 1990s and later widened into one of the world’s most liquid equity index derivatives ecosystems.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

NFT Sales Jump 27% Despite Sharp Drop in Market Activity

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new name of the rebranded crypto index from Nasdaq and CME?

AThe new name is the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index.

QAccording to the article, what is the main purpose of the revised index?

AThe revised index is designed to act as the base benchmark for investors seeking exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies.

QWhich major cryptocurrencies are tracked by the new Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index?

AThe index tracks BTC, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano, and Avalanche.

QWhat two core principles are at the heart of the index's structure, as stated in the article?

AGovernance and transparency are at the core of the index's structure.

QHow does the head of index product management at Nasdaq describe the direction investors are moving in?

ASean Wasserman stated that investors are moving towards an index-based approach, looking beyond only BTC.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot