Most Crypto Assets Confirmed As Non-Securities By SEC And CFTC In New Guidance

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-17Actualizado a 2026-03-17

Resumen

In a significant regulatory development, the US SEC and CFTC have issued joint guidance clarifying that the majority of crypto assets are not securities. This long-awaited move aims to end over a decade of uncertainty by providing a clear framework for digital tokens under federal securities laws. The guidance establishes a detailed taxonomy, categorizing assets as digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, or securities. It explains how token classification can change over time and addresses the application of securities rules to activities like airdrops, staking, and mining. Both agencies encourage market participants to review the interpretation to understand regulatory jurisdiction.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Tuesday issued joint guidance that clarifies how federal securities laws apply to many crypto assets, a move aimed at ending years of regulatory uncertainty.

The agencies said the interpretation makes clear that the bulk of digital tokens are not securities, while laying out how certain transactions and token evolutions can bring them within, or remove them from, securities regulation.

Clarity After A Decade Of Crypto Uncertainty

In the official release, the SEC framed the guidance as a milestone in its effort to provide clearer rules for market participants and to complement ongoing Congressional work to codify a comprehensive market-structure framework.

“After more than a decade of uncertainty, this interpretation will provide market participants with a clear understanding of how the Commission treats crypto assets under federal securities laws,” SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins said.

Chair Atkins added that the interpretation recognizes something the previous administration did not fully acknowledge: most crypto assets are not securities.

The guidance also acknowledges that investment-contract status can end — a point Atkins said will help entrepreneurs and investors while Congress advances bipartisan market-structure legislation (CLARITY Act).

The CFTC joined the SEC’s interpretation and signaled it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act in a manner consistent with the SEC’s approach. Together, the agencies provided a more detailed taxonomy to help classify digital assets and the activities that surround them.

Fresh Classification Framework

Key elements of the interpretation include a structured token taxonomy that separates digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities.

This categorization is intended to reduce ambiguity about which regulatory regime applies to different types of tokens and, by extension, to the platforms and services that handle them.

The guidance also addresses the dynamic nature of token classification. It clarifies how a “non-security crypto asset” — defined as a crypto asset that is not itself a security — may become subject to securities rules, and how it may cease to be treated as an investment contract over time.

The interpretation further explains how federal securities laws apply to airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and the practice of “wrapping” a non-security crypto asset. The statement concludes:

Market participants—from innovators and issuers to individual investors—should review this interpretation to better understand the regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC. The interpretation will be published on SEC.gov and in the Federal Register.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.5 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the joint guidance issued by the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint guidance aims to end years of regulatory uncertainty by clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, providing clear rules for market participants, and complementing ongoing Congressional work on market-structure legislation.

QAccording to the guidance, how are most crypto assets classified?

AThe guidance confirms that most crypto assets are not securities, providing a clear classification that separates them from digital securities under federal securities laws.

QWhat key elements are included in the new token taxonomy framework?

AThe new taxonomy framework categorizes digital assets into digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities to reduce ambiguity about which regulatory regime applies.

QHow does the guidance address the dynamic nature of token classification?

AIt clarifies how a non-security crypto asset may become subject to securities rules or cease to be treated as an investment contract over time, acknowledging that investment-contract status can change.

QWhat specific crypto-related activities does the interpretation explain in relation to federal securities laws?

AThe interpretation explains how federal securities laws apply to airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and the practice of 'wrapping' a non-security crypto asset.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片