Moscow Exchange to Launch Its Own Digital Depository for Cryptocurrencies

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-06Actualizado a 2026-08-06

Resumen

Moscow Exchange is preparing to launch its own digital depository for cryptocurrency operations, independent from the National Settlement Depository, with a planned launch by late 2026 or early 2027. Several liquidity hubs are emerging, and brokers will choose between connecting to this new depository or developing their own infrastructure. The Bank of Russia has published draft requirements for digital depositories, outlining a structure similar to securities depositories and establishing minimum capital levels: 50 million rubles for basic asset accounting, 100 million for managing blockchain addresses/foreign custodian accounts, and 250 million for a settlement depository. Several major financial institutions are building their own infrastructure. Sberbank aims to launch its depository and trading platform by December 1, 2026. Alfa-Bank has begun test trading and plans a full launch and its own depository in Q4. VTB and the T-Technologies Group (using the "Atomize" platform) are also developing depositories, while SPB Exchange is ready to start operations once regulations are in place. The law "On Digital Currency and Digital Rights" comes into force on September 1, 2026, with a transition period until July 1, 2027. This sets the stage for a market with multiple independent depository infrastructures competing for licenses, creating a distributed architecture. This model spreads risk but may complicate client asset transfers, contrasting with the centralized approach see...

The Moscow Exchange is preparing to launch its own digital depository for cryptocurrency transactions. The new structure will not be directly linked to the National Settlement Depository (NSD), and the project itself is planned to be put into operation at the end of 2026 or early 2027.

Several liquidity centers are forming simultaneously in the Russian crypto market—both on the exchange platform and within large financial groups. Brokers will be offered a choice: connect to the Moscow Exchange's depository or develop their own infrastructure for storing digital assets.

What the Regulator Proposes

On July 27, 2026, the Bank of Russia published a draft regulation on requirements for the activities of a digital depository, the procedure for opening and maintaining digital accounts, and operations on them. The document describes such a structure as an accounting infrastructure modeled on a securities market depository—with requirements for the information system and registers of depositors, assets, and operations.

Simultaneously, the regulator presented draft instructions on the minimum size of own funds for a digital depository:

  • 50 million rubles—for basic asset accounting

  • 100 million rubles—for administering blockchain addresses or maintaining accounts with a foreign crypto custodian

  • 250 million rubles—for a settlement digital depository

Who Is Already Building Their Own Infrastructure

  • Sberbank plans to launch its own depository and infrastructure for cryptocurrency trading by December 1, 2026—this was announced by First Deputy Chairman of the Executive Board Alexander Vedyakhin

  • Alfa-Bank was the first among Russian banks to launch test cryptocurrency trading in the Alfa-Investments application, with a full launch scheduled for the fourth quarter; Operational Director of CIB Dmitry Vitman stated that the bank plans both its own digital depository and a full range of crypto services after the regulation comes into force

  • The T-Technologies Group is preparing a depository on the Atomize platform and expects to become one of the first licensed market operators, said Executive Director Vyacheslav Tsyganov

  • VTB is forming a digital depository for the storage and circulation of crypto assets

  • SPB Exchange announced its readiness to start cryptocurrency transactions immediately after the Bank of Russia's by-laws appear

The Law "On Digital Currency and Digital Rights" comes into force on September 1, 2026, and the transition period will last until July 1, 2027.

Thus, by the time the law comes into force, several independent depository infrastructures are being prepared simultaneously in the market—from the Moscow Exchange to the largest banks. Each of them is guided by the regulator's requirements for capital and asset accounting, and the final market configuration will depend on which structures receive licenses first.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the Russian model of depository infrastructure is choosing a path of distributed architecture: capital and licenses are distributed immediately among the exchange, banks, and brokers, rather than being concentrated with a single operator. A similar fork moment has already occurred in the region: Kazakhstan followed a centralized scenario, where the National Bank gained the right to license crypto exchanges and compile a list of permitted assets, securing for itself the status of the main market arbiter.

Such a centralized structure reduces the risk of liquidity fragmentation but increases the entire market's dependence on the decisions of a single authority. The distributed model, conversely, spreads risks among several players but may complicate the transfer of client assets when changing brokers or if problems arise on one of the platforms. Which of the two architectures will prove more resilient under external pressure is a question whose answer will only be provided by the practice of the coming months.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Moscow Exchange planning to launch for cryptocurrency operations?

AThe Moscow Exchange is preparing to launch its own digital depository for cryptocurrency operations.

QBy when is the Moscow Exchange's digital depository project expected to be operational?

AThe project is planned to be launched by the end of 2026 or the beginning of 2027.

QWhat are the minimum capital requirements for a basic asset accounting digital depository according to the Bank of Russia's proposals?

AThe minimum capital requirement for a basic asset accounting digital depository is 50 million rubles.

QWhich major Russian bank plans to launch its own depository and cryptocurrency trading infrastructure by December 1, 2026?

ASberbank plans to launch its own depository and cryptocurrency trading infrastructure by December 1, 2026.

QWhen does the Russian law 'On Digital Currency and Digital Rights' come into force?

AThe law 'On Digital Currency and Digital Rights' comes into force on September 1, 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片