Morgan Stanley Initiates Bitcoin Miner Coverage, Rates Cipher and TeraWulf Overweight, Marathon Underweight

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

Morgan Stanley has initiated coverage on major Bitcoin miners, framing them as infrastructure businesses rather than pure cryptocurrency plays. The bank assigned Overweight ratings to Cipher Mining and TeraWulf, citing their potential to transition into stable utility-like companies through long-term power contracts and site leasing—particularly to AI tenants. Cipher is seen as well-positioned for a potential “REIT endgame,” while TeraWulf’s management experience in power and infrastructure supports its positive outlook. In contrast, Marathon Digital received an Underweight rating due to its heavy dependence on Bitcoin price volatility, mining difficulty, and energy costs, making it a higher-risk investment. Morgan Stanley emphasizes that the infrastructure model offers more predictable income and deserves higher valuation multiples.

Morgan Stanley has started formally analyzing the three major publicly traded Bitcoin miners. They argued that these miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet; instead, they should be valued as an infrastructure business. The bank has given overweight ratings on Cipher Mining and Terawulf, while giving Marathon Digital an underweight rating.

Morgan Stanley believes that once the mining company starts building large, powered sites and signing long-term contracts with customers, it starts looking like a real utility and infrastructure company. Infrastructure investors usually pay higher valuations because income is predictable and contracted with less dependence on the bitcoin value.

Why Cipher and TeraWulf Seem to be Positive

Morgan Stanley says Cipher is well-positioned for what he called a “REIT endgame.” If the Cipher leases its building and power capacity to the AI instead of mining, then risk drops, and valuation could increase. Morgan Stanley sees more upside if the transaction happens.

TeraWulf also received a similar positive rating because the management has deep power and infrastructure experience, with the company already having a history of signing hosting and data center agreements. The analyst believes that future sites can be converted from mining to AI tenants.

Why is Morgan Stanley Cautious on Marathon Digital

For Marathon Digital, Stanley took a different position. Morgan Stanley says that the MARA behaves mainly like the bitcoin price vehicle, and it actively tries to increase BTC exposure. So its stock performance depends heavily on the difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings. Morgan Stanley warns that mining profitability faces pressure from competition and rising energy demands.

These reports arrive when the investors are debating the future identity of Bitcoin miners. Morgan Stanley replies with its report to all the investors that the infrastructure model gives more stability and deserves a higher value than pure mining.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Dogecoin Price Shows Mixed Signals as Key Technical Levels Are Tested

TagsCipher MiningJPMorganMarathon

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Morgan Stanley's main argument regarding the valuation of major Bitcoin miners?

AMorgan Stanley argues that Bitcoin miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet but should be valued as infrastructure businesses, as they build large powered sites and sign long-term contracts, making them similar to utility companies.

QWhich two Bitcoin mining companies received an 'overweight' rating from Morgan Stanley?

ACipher Mining and TeraWulf received overweight ratings from Morgan Stanley.

QWhy does Morgan Stanley view Cipher Mining positively, specifically mentioning a 'REIT endgame'?

AMorgan Stanley views Cipher positively because it is well-positioned for a 'REIT endgame,' where leasing its building and power capacity to AI instead of mining would reduce risk and increase valuation.

QWhat is the reason for Morgan Stanley's cautious (underweight) rating on Marathon Digital?

AMorgan Stanley is cautious on Marathon Digital because it behaves mainly as a Bitcoin price vehicle, actively increasing BTC exposure, making its stock performance heavily dependent on mining difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings, with profitability facing competition and rising energy demands.

QAccording to the report, what advantage does the infrastructure model offer to investors?

AThe infrastructure model offers more stability and deserves a higher valuation because income is predictable and contracted, with less dependence on the value of Bitcoin.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Solana Price Forecast for August 2026: Can $19 Million from Morgan Stanley and 330,000 Korean Merchants Break SOL's Triangle?

**Solana Price Forecast for August 2026: Key Catalysts and Technical Setup** As of July 31, Solana (SOL) trades at $73.59, consolidating within a triangle pattern formed between its May peak (~$98) and June low (~$60.29). A decisive breakout from this pattern is anticipated. Key resistance levels are clustered around $74.79 (0.382 Fib), $75.33 (20-day EMA), $76.01 (50-day EMA), and a critical zone near $79 (0.5 Fib & 100-day EMA). Support lies at $73.42, $69.25 (0.236 Fib), and the June low of $60.29. Two major institutional catalysts emerged recently: 1. **Morgan Stanley's MSOL ETF:** Launched July 28, it saw $19.06 million in inflows on its second day—the largest single-day inflow for any US SOL ETF since mid-May. 2. **KSNET Partnership:** The Solana Foundation signed an MoU with South Korean payment processor KSNET (serving 330,000 merchants) to explore integrating Solana Pay for domestic and AI-powered transactions. Historically, August has been volatile for SOL, marked by extreme gains in 2020 and 2021 but otherwise weak performance. The forecast for August 2026 is bifurcated: * **Bullish Case:** An upside triangle breakout, sustained MSOL inflows, and positive momentum from the KSNET news could propel SOL toward the $79 resistance cluster, especially if the CLARITY Act is passed by August 8. * **Bearish Case:** A downside break below $73.42, fading excitement around the new ETF, and stalled regulatory progress could see SOL retest support near $69.25, exacerbated by macro risks.

cryptonews.ruHace 28 min(s)

Solana Price Forecast for August 2026: Can $19 Million from Morgan Stanley and 330,000 Korean Merchants Break SOL's Triangle?

cryptonews.ruHace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片