Momentum Weakens for Ethena (ENA): Will the Bears Deliver Another Blow?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

Ethena (ENA) is experiencing weakening momentum, with its price declining by 1.38% amid a broader crypto market sentiment of extreme fear. After reaching an early high of $0.1131, ENA dropped to a low of $0.1071 and is currently trading at $0.1114. Key support lies at $0.108; a break below could lead to further losses toward $0.10, while holding may allow a push toward $0.129 resistance. Technical indicators are bearish: the MACD has crossed below zero, CMF shows selling pressure at -0.15, and the RSI is at 32.21, indicating oversold conditions. The Bull Bear Power suggests slight bearish dominance, but overall momentum remains neutral.

Today, the market opened with a brief spike, placing the overall market cap at $2.33 trillion. The broader sentiment across the crypto assets is extreme fear, with the Fear and Greed Index value settled at 12. The dominant tokens, Bitcoin and Ethereum, are attempting to jump over the bearish fence. Meanwhile, Ethena (ENA) has slipped by 1.38%.

In the early hours, the asset traded at a high of $0.1131, and eventually, with the bearish encounter, the ENA price dropped to a low of $0.1071. At the time of writing, Ethena trades at $0.1114, with its daily trading volume surged by over 52.72%, reaching $101.89 million. In addition, the market has observed a 24-hour liquidation of $547.24 worth of Ethena.

On the 4-hour chart, $0.108 acts as a key support level for ENA. With the current price around $0.1114, it is trading slightly above that support. If $0.108 holds, the buyers may step in and push the price up toward the resistance around $0.129. If the asset breaks that support range below, the downside pressure strengthens, and further losses could follow.

Ethena’s recent trading window reports the downside momentum, and the price might retrace toward the $0.10 support mark. An extended loss could trigger the death cross to unfold and drive the price even lower. On the flip side, if the bulls take control, the immediate resistance level could be near $0.12. If the upside pressure gains more traction, the golden cross may take place and see the Ethena price climbing further.

Downside Risk Mounts for Ethena as Bearish Signals Emerge

Ethena’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and signal line have crossed below the zero line. This likely points out that the broader trend has turned negative. With this crossover, the downside momentum is strengthening.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is at -0.15, implying moderate to strong selling pressure in the ENA market. The negative value shows a sustained capital outflow, where distribution dominates rather than accumulation.

The current market sentiment of Ethena is approaching its oversold territory, with the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) being at 32.21. It has strong bearish momentum, and heavy selling pressure is present. A relief bounce could occur if buyers step in.

Moreover, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading is settled at around -0.0057, which is likely hinting at very weak bearish dominance. As it is slightly below zero, the sellers have a minor edge. Significantly, the overall momentum of ENA is neutral.

Top Updated Crypto News

MYX Finance (MYX) Rockets 80%: Trend Reversal Confirmed or Rally Running on Fumes?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current market sentiment for Ethena (ENA) based on the technical indicators mentioned?

AThe market sentiment for Ethena is bearish, with the MACD crossing below the zero line, the CMF at -0.15 indicating selling pressure, and the daily RSI at 32.21 showing it's approaching oversold territory.

QWhat are the key support and resistance levels for ENA according to the 4-hour chart?

AThe key support level is at $0.108. If this holds, the price could move toward the resistance around $0.129. The immediate resistance level if bulls take control is near $0.12.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) value of -0.15 indicate for the ENA market?

AA CMF value of -0.15 implies moderate to strong selling pressure, indicating sustained capital outflow where distribution dominates over accumulation.

QWhat potential price movement could a break below the $0.108 support level trigger for ENA?

AIf the price breaks below the $0.108 support, the downside pressure would strengthen, potentially leading to further losses and a retrace toward the $0.10 support mark.

QWhat is the significance of the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading being at -0.0057 for ENA?

AA BBP reading of -0.0057, slightly below zero, indicates very weak bearish dominance, meaning sellers have a minor edge but the overall momentum is neutral.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 9 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 9 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot