Micron Invests $24 Billion in Singapore Factory, But Your RAM Sticks Are Not in the Plan

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-27Actualizado a 2026-01-27

Resumen

Micron announces a $24 billion investment to build an advanced NAND wafer fabrication plant in Singapore, with production starting in late 2028. This follows a previous $7 billion investment in a high-bandwidth memory (HBM) advanced packaging facility at the same site, bringing total new investments in Singapore to over $30 billion. The move comes as Micron shifts its focus toward AI-driven demand and away from consumer products, having recently discontinued its Crucial consumer brand, which sold retail memory modules and SSDs. The strategic pivot is driven by surging demand from AI and data centers. Micron’s HBM revenue reached $1.98 billion in Q3 FY2025, with full-year 2026 HBM supply already sold out. The company predicts the HBM market will grow to around $100 billion by 2028, surpassing the entire DRAM market of 2024. In contrast, consumer memory market is lower-margin and highly competitive. This supply shift has contributed to significant price increases in consumer memory products, with DDR4 and DDR5 spot prices rising over 150% and 300% respectively in 2025. Although Samsung and SK Hynix have extended DDR4 production in response to soaring prices, overall supply remains tight. As AI continues to drive memory demand, consumer memory costs are expected to stay elevated.

Author: David, Shenchao TechFlow

At this time last year, a 16GB DDR4 RAM stick cost just over 200 RMB. Now, the same model is priced at 600 RMB, with some models even approaching 700 RMB.

The direct reason for the price increase is a tightening of supply. The three major memory giants have collectively shifted their production capacity towards the AI market. And Micron is the latest to lay its cards on the table.

On January 27, Micron Technology announced a $24 billion (approximately S$31 billion) investment to build an advanced NAND (flash memory) wafer fabrication plant in Singapore. The investment will be phased over 10 years, with shipments starting in the second half of 2028. Singapore's Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong attended the groundbreaking ceremony.

This is Micron's second major investment in Singapore.

In January 2025, Micron had already begun construction on a $7 billion HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) advanced packaging facility within the same campus, scheduled for production in 2027. Combined, these two projects represent over $30 billion in new investments by Micron in Singapore.

Image source: Lianhe Zaobao, photo by Tang Jiahong

Yet, this is the same company that just two months ago announced the shutdown of its 29-year-old Crucial consumer brand—the memory sticks and solid-state drives you can buy on JD.com and Taobao.

On one hand, spending billions to build factories; on the other, cutting the consumer business. Both point to the same clue: the demand for memory from AI remains high.

Capacity Reallocation After China Market Contraction

Micron's increased investment in Singapore has a clear geopolitical background.

In May 2023, China's Cyberspace Administration announced that Micron's products had not passed the cybersecurity review and required domestic critical information infrastructure operators to stop procurement. In 2018, the Chinese mainland market contributed 58% of Micron's revenue (approximately $17.36 billion); by fiscal year 2022, this had fallen to 10.8% (approximately $3.31 billion).

Production capacity needs a new outlet.

Currently, Micron already has three 3D NAND fabrication plants and several packaging and testing facilities in Singapore, employing about 9,000 people and producing 98% of Micron's flash memory chips.

Micron stated in its latest announcement that the HBM factory is expected to make a significant contribution to supply by 2027 and mentioned that as HBM becomes part of the Singapore manufacturing operations, "synergistic effects" in both NAND and DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory, the common memory chips) production are anticipated.

But the priority of this "synergy" is clear: HBM capacity for 2026 is completely sold out, data center customer demand cannot be fully met, and the consumer brand is being shut down simultaneously.

Within the same campus, consumer-grade production lines are making way for AI production lines.

The Business Logic of Exiting the Consumer Market

On December 3, 2025, Micron announced via its official website a complete exit from the Crucial consumer business, including the sales of RAM sticks and SSD (Solid State Drive) products through global retailers, e-commerce platforms, and distributors.

Shipments will continue until the end of February 2026, at which point this brand, founded in 1996, will bid farewell to the retail market.

In the statement, Micron's Executive Vice President, Sadana, stated that the surge in memory and storage demand driven by AI in data centers prompted Micron to make the "difficult decision" to exit the Crucial consumer business in order to more effectively supply and support large strategic customers in high-growth areas.

Data supports this judgment.

Micron's fiscal year 2025 third-quarter HBM product income reached $1.98 billion, with an annualized revenue close to $8 billion. According to TrendForce data, the unit price of HBM memory required for AI servers is about 8 times that of ordinary servers.

Micron predicts the HBM market size will grow from approximately $35 billion in 2025 to about $100 billion in 2028, by which time it will exceed the size of the entire DRAM market in 2024.

In contrast, consumer-grade storage is a business with thin profits and fierce competition.

Micron's exit means the world's major consumer DRAM manufacturers are reduced from three—Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron—to two.

The AI Rally of Memory Stocks

The capital market has already priced in this shift.

According to statistics from *National Business Daily*, memory stocks occupied the top four spots on the U.S. stock gainers list for the full year 2025:

SanDisk rose 577%, becoming the S&P 500's top performer for the year; Western Digital rose 281%; Micron rose 236%; Seagate rose 216%.

For comparison, Nvidia rose 39% in the same period, ranking 71st.

It was reported that tech giants like Google and Amazon presented Micron with "unlimited purchase demands" in October 2025. Micron CEO Mehrotra revealed on an earnings call that the company's entire HBM supply for 2026 is already sold out, and currently, it can only meet half to two-thirds of the demand from key customers.

Micron's latest financial report shows revenue of $13.6 billion for September-November 2025, a year-on-year increase of 57%, with DRAM revenue of $10.8 billion, up 69% year-on-year.

Consumer Side: Price Hikes May Continue

Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron had all previously announced plans to gradually phase out DDR4 production from late 2025 to early 2026. Micron issued an end-of-life notice for DDR4/LPDDR4 in June.

Although Samsung and SK Hynix later extended their DDR4 production plans to the end of 2026 due to soaring DDR4 prices, the overall trend of tightening supply remains unchanged.

The price reaction has been intense. According to TrendForce data, since 2025, the spot price of DDR5 memory chips has risen over 300%, while DDR4 has risen over 150%. DDR4 has even seen a "price inversion," with the price of some specifications exceeding that of DDR5.

ADATA Chairman Chen Libai also publicly stated that the comprehensive shortage and price increase across the four major storage categories—DRAM, NAND, SSD, HDD—is a situation he is witnessing for the first time in over thirty years in the industry.

If you want to add memory to your old computer or build a new desktop, the cost remains high. Because AI needs computing power, and computing power needs memory. Your old computer is probably still behind AI demand in the queue.

Memory stocks have risen, and memory stick prices have risen too.

One is an investment opportunity; the other is paying the bill for that opportunity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Micron announce the closure of its Crucial consumer brand?

AMicron closed its Crucial consumer brand to reallocate resources and supply to meet the surging demand for memory and storage from data centers and large strategic customers driven by AI, as the consumer market is less profitable and highly competitive.

QWhat is the total investment Micron is making in Singapore for new manufacturing facilities?

AMicron is investing a total of over $30 billion in Singapore, including $24 billion for a new NAND wafer fab and over $7 billion for an HBM advanced packaging plant.

QHow has the price of consumer memory modules changed recently according to the article?

AThe price of a 16GB DDR4 memory module has increased from over 200 yuan to about 600 yuan, with some models nearing 700 yuan, due to tightened supply and shifted production focus to AI.

QWhat percentage of Micron's revenue came from the Chinese market in 2022 compared to 2018?

AIn 2018, the Chinese market contributed 58% of Micron's revenue, but by the 2022 fiscal year, it had decreased to 10.8%.

QWhich storage-related stocks were the top performers in the U.S. stock market in 2025 according to the article?

AIn 2025, the top-performing U.S. storage stocks were SanDisk (up 577%), Western Digital (up 281%), Micron (up 236%), and Seagate (up 216%).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros