Michael Saylor Says Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Not Immediate

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-24Actualizado a 2026-02-24

Resumen

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, addressed concerns about quantum computing as a potential threat to Bitcoin, stating it is not an immediate risk and is at least a decade away. He emphasized that the broader cybersecurity community views quantum risk as a long-term issue rather than a current threat. Saylor expressed confidence in the Bitcoin ecosystem’s ability to adapt, noting that upgrades would be implemented across global systems if such a risk emerged. He also highlighted MicroStrategy’s significant Bitcoin holdings, which now total 717,722 BTC worth approximately $54.56 billion, despite recent market declines.

Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, discussed concerns about the quantum threat to Bitcoin in an interview and clarified that it is not an immediate security risk at this time, as it is ten years away.

​On February 23, Natalie Brunell, who shared a recent episode of her Coin Stories podcast on X with Saylor, in which they discussed several topics around Bitcoin and Strategy. In the middle of the conversation, Brunell asked whether quantum computing poses an existential threat to Bitcoin.

​She noted that many people are not technical enough to independently verify the seriousness of the risk and referenced Strategy’s earlier statement suggesting Bitcoin is “quantum-proof.” She asked Saylor why this is not considered a bigger threat.

​In response, Saylor stressed that quantum risk is not seen as imminent by the larger cybersecurity community. He insisted that the “consensus of the cyber security community broadly held is that quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years out. It’s not a this-decade thing.”

Quantum Threat Would Trigger Upgrades

Saylor stated, “The crypto community is the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,” he added, adding that it already makes use of innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys. He proposed that Bitcoin uses extremely sophisticated security measures in comparison compared to traditional banking systems.

​Then, Saylor went on and said that if a quantum risk materialized, it would lead to upgrades in the software that runs the Bitcoin network, the global banking system, the global internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks. Eventually, post-quantum-resistant cryptography would replace all digital devices. In his view, quantum risk is currently in the spotlight largely because other anticipated risks have not materialized.

​He said, “You’ll see it coming. We’ll all see it coming, as the crypto security community will be the first to identify any real quantum threat, perceive it, and lead the way. Also, it can have enough time to implement necessary upgrades in response to emerging threats.

Strategy’s Bitcoin Accumulation and Market Performance

Saylor had previously posted “The Orange Century” on his X account, hinting at Strategy’s 100th Bitcoin buy. As the company began to accumulate Bitcoin in 2020 and has since expanded to become the biggest corporate owner in the world. The company owns 717,722 Bitcoin, which is worth around $54.56 billion.

​While writing this article, Bitcoin is down over 3% in the past 24 hours, and is trading at $62,884, which is actually down over 29% over the past month. Also, Bitcoin is down beyond 50% from its last all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TagsBitcoinMicheal Saylorquantum

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Michael Saylor, when is the quantum threat to Bitcoin expected to become a significant risk?

AAccording to Michael Saylor, the consensus of the cybersecurity community is that the quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years away and is not a threat for this decade.

QWhat did Michael Sayer suggest would happen if a quantum risk to cryptography did materialize?

ASaylor stated that a materialized quantum risk would trigger upgrades to the Bitcoin network's software, the global banking system, the internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks, leading to their replacement with post-quantum-resistant cryptography.

QHow does Michael Saylor describe the Bitcoin and crypto community in terms of cybersecurity?

ASaylor described the crypto community as 'the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,' which already employs innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys and uses extremely sophisticated security measures compared to traditional banking systems.

QHow many Bitcoins does MicroStrategy (Strategy) own, and what is their approximate value?

AMicroStrategy owns 717,722 Bitcoins, which are worth approximately $54.56 billion.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $62,884, down over 3% in the past 24 hours and down over 29% over the past month. It was also down more than 50% from its all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片