Metaplanet CEO Defends Disclosure Practices Amid Bitcoin Strategy Criticism

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich defended the company's disclosure practices and Bitcoin strategy against recent criticism. He emphasized full transparency, noting that all Bitcoin holdings are publicly verifiable via a real-time dashboard. Gerovich confirmed that the company made four Bitcoin purchases in September—each publicly announced—as part of a long-term accumulation strategy, not market timing. He also addressed options trading, explaining that selling puts is used to lower acquisition costs, not for speculation. The company reported strong operational income growth despite accounting losses from Bitcoin's price volatility. Gerovich, a major shareholder, reaffirmed commitment to the stated strategy amid stock price declines.

Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich responded to criticism about disclosure practices, Bitcoin purchases, options trading, and financial reporting transparency. He said that it is easy to criticize without accountability, but he takes responsibility for all his public actions. Gerovich also denied accusations that the company’s disclosures were misleading, saying that such accusations were inflammatory and untrue. The company had to allocate more capital to income operations due to the volatility of the past six months.

Metaplanet publicly discloses all Bitcoin addresses, allowing shareholders to check their holdings in real-time through a dashboard. Gerovich said that this makes Metaplanet one of the most transparent publicly traded companies in the world. On the issue of purchases in September, it was alleged that the company bought at market peaks without notice.

Gerovich responded that Metaplanet made four purchases of Bitcoin in September, and each time they announced the purchase. He agreed that September marked the top of the local market but again stated that timing markets is not a strategy. The company uses a long-term strategy of systematic accumulation of Bitcoins irrespective of market prices. Gerovich pointed out that the company makes consistent announcements for all purchases of Bitcoin.

Options Strategy, Financial Reporting, and Transparency of Borrowing

Gerovich clarified that selling put options does not amount to speculating on the rising price of Bitcoin. Rather, the company utilizes options to buy Bitcoin at a cost lower than buying it outright. He clarified that selling an eighty-thousand-dollar put with a ten-thousand-dollar premium reduces the cost.

The company took advantage of Bitcoin’s volatility to significantly lower the cost of acquisition in the fourth quarter. Gerovich explained that net income is not a good measure of performance for Bitcoin treasury firms. Operating income of 6.2 billion yen was recorded, showing a year-over-year surge of 1,694 percent. The recurring loss was solely due to the change in the value of long-term Bitcoins. The firm does not plan to sell the Bitcoins, he clarified.

Capital, Alignment of Shareholders, and Business Performance

Gerovich reiterated that he is a major shareholder and feels the impact of stock price fluctuations. He clarified that the funds have been raised strictly in line with the announced strategy and plans. The stock price of Metaplanet has dropped by 23%, while that of Bitcoin has fallen by 24% this year. The hotel operation segment reported revenue of 437 million yen and operating profit of 169 million yen in FY2025.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ledn Taps Asset-Backed Market With Landmark $188M Bitcoin Bond

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich say in response to criticism about the company's disclosure practices and Bitcoin purchases?

ASimon Gerovich defended the company's disclosure practices, stating that all public actions are his responsibility and that accusations of misleading disclosures were inflammatory and untrue. He emphasized that Metaplanet publicly discloses all Bitcoin purchases and addresses, making it one of the most transparent publicly traded companies.

QHow does Metaplanet's strategy for acquiring Bitcoin work, according to Gerovich?

AMetaplanet employs a long-term strategy of systematic Bitcoin accumulation regardless of market prices. The company does not attempt to time the market and makes consistent announcements for all purchases. Additionally, they use options strategies, like selling puts, to acquire Bitcoin at a lower cost than buying it outright.

QWhat reason did Gerovich give for the company's reported recurring loss, and what was the performance of its operating income?

AGerovich clarified that the recurring loss was solely due to the change in the value of its long-term Bitcoin holdings. He stated that net income is not a good performance measure for a Bitcoin treasury firm and highlighted that the company's operating income was 6.2 billion yen, a year-over-year surge of 1,694%.

QHow transparent is Metaplanet regarding its Bitcoin holdings, and what tool do shareholders have?

AMetaplanet provides full transparency by publicly disclosing all of its Bitcoin addresses. This allows shareholders to check the company's holdings in real-time through a dedicated dashboard.

QWhat was the performance of Metaplanet's stock price and its hotel business in the reported period?

AMetaplanet's stock price has dropped by 23% this year, closely tracking Bitcoin's 24% decline. Meanwhile, its hotel operation segment reported revenue of 437 million yen and an operating profit of 169 million yen for FY2025.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros