Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Liquidation Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Despite Rebound

MatrixportPublicado a 2026-02-27Actualizado a 2026-02-27

Resumen

Based on Matrixport's research, Bitcoin's recent breakdown below a key support level, as indicated in the October 31, 2025, report, has confirmed a bearish trend. The magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are comparable to previous bear market phases. The market focus has shifted from debating a potential trend reversal to anticipating the next optimal window for asset allocation. The analysis, utilizing a cyclical framework, identifies that Bitcoin likely entered a confirmed bear market phase after multiple characteristics of a late fifth bull cycle emerged and key support level was lost. A critical development was Bitcoin's break below its one-year moving average in November 2025, a historical signal often marking the start of a bear market that typically lasts around 12 months. This projects the next potential bull cycle to begin in Q4 2026, with a cyclical low possibly arriving earlier in Q3 2026. The report posits that Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is less driven by halving events and is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of U.S. mid-term election cycles, which bring regulatory and political uncertainty that better explains the timing of market tops and bottoms. From a technical perspective, key monthly indicators have not yet reached crucial oversold thresholds that have historically signaled a market bottom. The monthly Stochastic oscillator, which often completed its bottoming process after falling below 15%, currently sits at approximately 39%. Similarly, the ...

"Key thresholds not yet breached, reversal signals absent—true allocation window still awaits confirmation"

Recently, Bitcoin's price broke below the critical level indicated in the October 31, 2025 report, confirming the downward trend. From a historical cycle perspective, the magnitude and rhythm of this pullback are highly similar to past bear market phases. Market focus has consequently shifted from "whether the trend is reversing" to "when the next worthwhile allocation window will arrive."

Looking back at this cycle, we identified the bull market starting point on October 28, 2022, based on our cycle framework, and projected that the cycle peak would reach or touch $125,000 around July 6, 2023. From late 2024 to around October 2025, Bitcoin has repeatedly exhibited characteristics typical of the final stages of its fifth bull market; with the loss of key support levels, the market has formally entered a confirmed bear phase.

Against this backdrop, we have combined the one-year moving average, monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics), monthly RSI, and other quantitative models to assess the corresponding time and price ranges of potential low zones. This is to determine whether the downside risks have been largely cleared and whether the market is beginning to accumulate conditions for a shift from weak to strong.

After Breaking the One-Year Moving Average, the Cycle Framework Points to 2026

In November 2025, Bitcoin broke below its one-year moving average. Historical experience shows that this signal often corresponds to the start of a bear market, and past bear market phases have typically lasted about 12 months. By this推算, the next bull market could start in the fourth quarter of 2026, with the cycle low more likely occurring in the third quarter of 2026.

From a more macro perspective, we believe Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is not primarily driven by the block reward halving but is more likely synchronized with the rhythm of the US mid-term election cycle. Historical data shows that the mid-term election cycles of 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022, and the upcoming 2026 have all coincided with major bear market phases. Compared to the halving mechanism, the regulatory and political uncertainty波动 brought by mid-term elections better explains the timing distribution of Bitcoin's cycle tops and bottoms.

Technical Indicators Have Not Yet Touched Key Thresholds, Confirming a Bottom Still Requires Waiting for "Reversal Confirmation"

On the technical front, the monthly stochastic indicator (Stochastics) in the last five cycles often completed its bottoming after falling below the 15% "deep oversold" zone, followed by an upward reversal within 1-3 months, signaling the end of the bear market. Currently, this indicator is around 39%, yet to touch the key threshold.

Similarly, the monthly RSI in historical cycles usually formed a key support band around the 48 level. True bottom signals often emerged during the "break below key level followed by a rebound" reversal confirmation stage. The current RSI is around the 50 level; although it is接近 the key zone, a clear "breakdown and rebound" structure has not yet appeared.

Both core indicators have not given clear bottom confirmation: the market has not yet shown the reversal confirmation corresponding to the "final concentrated liquidation."

Overall, the final low of this bear market may not yet have appeared. Historical experience shows that Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming during phases of low trading volume bias, gradual retreat of selling pressure, and declining market participation. Rapid pullbacks accompanied by forced liquidations and falling prices resemble phased capitulation selling, rather than the cycle's final low.

Under the dual perspectives of the political cycle framework and technical indicator verification, we are more inclined to believe that the truly worthwhile recovery allocation window requires waiting for key monthly indicators to touch extreme zones and show reversal confirmation. The price is currently approaching the historical low对应 range, but reversal signals have not yet appeared. Patience is still required during the bear market尾声 phase. The prerequisite for orderly recovery allocation is confirming the exhaustion of downward momentum, not merely judging a trend reversal based on the price approaching lows.

The above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading may carry significant risks and instability. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument of the Matrixport report regarding the current Bitcoin market?

AThe report argues that the recent price drop confirms a bear market, and while the price is approaching historical low ranges, the true reversal signal and the optimal window for re-entry have not yet appeared. Key technical indicators have not yet reached extreme oversold levels to confirm a bottom.

QAccording to the report, what historical event is the current Bitcoin cycle more closely aligned with, rather than the halving?

AThe report suggests Bitcoin's 'four-year cycle' is more likely synchronized with the U.S. mid-term election cycle, which brings regulatory and political uncertainty, rather than being primarily driven by the block reward halving mechanism.

QWhat is the predicted timeline for the next Bitcoin bull market based on the breakdown of the one-year moving average?

ABased on the historical pattern that bear markets typically last about 12 months after the one-year moving average is broken, the next bull market is projected to potentially start in Q4 2026, with the cycle low possibly occurring earlier in Q3 2026.

QWhat two key technical indicators does the report use to assess whether the market has bottomed, and what are their current readings?

AThe two key indicators are the monthly Stochastic oscillator (currently around 39%, not yet in the deep oversold zone below 15%) and the monthly RSI (currently around 50, close to but not yet breaking below its key support level of 48). Neither has given a clear 'breakdown then reversal' confirmation signal.

QWhat type of market environment does the report state is historically more conducive for forming a final bottom?

AHistorically, Bitcoin more often completes its bottoming process during a phase of low trading volume, gradual easing of selling pressure, and declining market participation, rather than during a volatile, high-volume sell-off driven by events like forced liquidations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片