Margin Exhausted, "Brother Huang Li Cheng" Begins Selling Monkeys at a Loss

Foresight NewsPublicado a 2026-06-29Actualizado a 2026-06-29

Resumen

Taiwanese crypto whale "Machi Big Brother" Jeffrey Huang has been forced to sell his prized Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs at significant losses to cover mounting losses from a highly leveraged ETH long position on Hyperliquid. Over the past month, Huang sold 34 BAYC NFTs for 326 ETH (approx. $514,000), realizing a loss of 399 ETH (approx. $631,000). The proceeds were transferred to Hyperliquid to replenish margin for his perpetual contract trades. One ape, BAYC #6057, bought for 76.84 ETH four years ago, was sold for just 7.65 ETH, a 90% loss in ETH terms. Huang began his high-leverage (25-40x) ETH long strategy in September 2025 when ETH was around $4,700. While his account once showed over $45 million in unrealized profit, the subsequent crash of ETH to the $1,600 range erased all gains. As of June 26, his cumulative losses on Hyperliquid reached $33.85 million, with over 335 liquidations earning him the community nickname "King of Liquidations." With conventional funds depleted, Huang's once-valuable NFT collection, which at its peak included around 200 BAYCs and was worth tens of millions, has become a lifeline. His remaining ~150 BAYCs, valued at roughly $1.6 million at current floor prices, provide only limited runway for his persistent high-stakes trading. Huang rose to prominence in crypto as a key figure in popularizing BAYC NFTs in Asia during the 2021 bull market. His pivot to perpetual contracts has now led to a cycle where his iconic "monkeys" are being so...


By:ChandlerZ, Foresight News


On June 27, Lookonchain reported that Taiwanese crypto whale Huang Li Cheng (Machi Big Brother, Brother Huang) has sold 34 Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs over the past month, receiving 326 ETH (approximately $514,000) and realizing a loss of 399 ETH (approximately $631,000).



Among them, Bored Ape #6057 was purchased four years ago for 76.84 ETH and sold now for 7.65 ETH, resulting in a 90% loss in ETH terms. On-chain data shows that all these ETH were transferred to Hyperliquid to replenish margin for his ETH long positions.



BAYC Becomes the Final Lifeline


The reason for Huang Li Cheng's sale of his apes is that the margin for his perpetual contract account can no longer hold up.


He began taking long positions on ETH on Hyperliquid in September 2025 when ETH was priced around $4,700, typically using 25x to 40x leverage. The strategy performed brilliantly initially. From late 2025 to early 2026, his account recorded floating profits of up to $45.66 million, earning him the new label of "on-chain whale trader" within the crypto community.



However, ETH subsequently fell all the way to the $1,600 range, wiping out all floating profits and turning them into substantial realized losses. According to HyperInsight data, as of June 26, Huang Li Cheng's cumulative losses on Hyperliquid have reached $33.85 million. Calculated based on total trading profit and loss over the past year, his losses exceed $80 million.


More telling is the frequency of liquidations. By March 2026, Huang Li Cheng had already suffered over 335 liquidations, earning him the community title "King of Liquidations." Liquidations have continued since then. On June 8, he was liquidated 10 times consecutively within 8 hours, with his account balance dropping to about $52,000 at one point. On June 23, when ETH fell to $1,607, he was liquidated another 7 times within 10 hours. His account balance has repeatedly dropped to extreme lows of a few thousand dollars, once falling to just $8,500 in February. Yet, each time it neared zero, he re-deposited funds to continue opening long positions.


The on-chain data platform Arkham pointed out on June 6 that it was the first time Huang Li Cheng "did not immediately add margin" after being liquidated, sparking community speculation that this high-stakes gamble might be coming to an end. However, just two days later, he deposited funds again and reopened ETH long positions.


As conventional funding sources were exhausted, Huang Li Cheng began drawing blood from his NFT collection. He previously held about 150 BAYCs, but at the current floor price (around 8.8 ETH), the total value of the remaining NFTs is only about $1.6 million, barely enough to support margin for a few rounds of highly leveraged positions. In an interview at the end of 2025, he stated he would "hold on without selling even with $30 million in losses," firmly bullish on ETH. Half a year later, losses have long exceeded that figure, and what was once a blue-chip NFT collection worth tens of millions of dollars has now become the lifeline for his perpetual contract account.


On June 26, he posted on X: "We're going to need more Tom. 8 percent." seemingly calling for Tom Lee to rescue the market.


From Godfather of Monkeys to King of Liquidations


Looking back at Huang Li Cheng's crypto journey, his starting point was far from that of an ordinary retail investor. Huang Li Cheng is a founding member of the pioneering Chinese hip-hop group L.A. Boyz. The live-streaming platform 17 Media (M17), which he founded in 2015, once became one of Asia's largest live-streaming applications. He entered the cryptocurrency space during the 2017 bull market and met Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin at a blockchain conference in Taiwan that same year. In 2020, he participated in creating the DeFi protocol Cream Finance, which later suffered three security breach attacks, resulting in cumulative losses exceeding $192 million.


What truly brought him fame in the crypto community was NFTs. During the 2021 bull market, Huang Li Cheng obtained dozens of BAYCs at the minting price of just 0.08 ETH, then aggressively bought more. At his peak, he held about 200 BAYCs and over 100 MAYCs, with his wallet containing a total of approximately 3,200 NFTs, valued at over $40 million.


He gifted BAYCs to top Chinese celebrities like Jay Chou, personally driving the breakout and spread of Bored Apes in the Asian market, earning him the community title "Godfather of Monkeys." That was the era when the BAYC floor price skyrocketed from 0.08 ETH to over 100 ETH, and Huang Li Cheng's ape holdings were once worth tens of millions of dollars.


However, after 2023, the NFT market cooled rapidly. Huang Li Cheng heavily bought blue-chip NFTs during the airdrop farming activities on the Blur platform, acquiring 71 BAYCs and 77 CryptoPunks within two days, suffering severe losses. In April of that year, he announced his exit from the NFT market. He briefly returned in July 2024, buying another 23 BAYCs within two weeks, but incurred losses exceeding $20 million over four months. Subsequently, his focus shifted entirely to perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid, initiating the ongoing cycle of highly leveraged long positions on ETH.


From a minting price of 0.08 ETH to a peak of over 100 ETH, to the current selling price of 7-10 ETH, the price curve of BAYC itself is the most complete footnote to the NFT cycle. Huang Li Cheng's personal trajectory is highly aligned with this curve: NFTs forged his identity as the "Godfather of Monkeys" and also provided the initial capital for his subsequent continuous bets on the contract gambling table. Now, the monkeys are being sold one by one, converted into ETH, converted into margin, and then converted into the next liquidation notice.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Huang Lichun start selling his Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs?

AHuang Lichun (Machi Big Brother) started selling his Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs because the margin in his leveraged futures trading account was insufficient. He sold the NFTs to convert them into ETH and deposit the funds into Hyperliquid to meet the margin requirements for his ETH long positions.

QWhat was the extent of Huang Lichun's financial loss on one specific BAYC NFT mentioned in the article?

AOne specific BAYC NFT, Bored Ape #6057, which Huang Lichun purchased for 76.84 ETH four years ago, was sold for 7.65 ETH. This resulted in an ETH-denominated loss of approximately 90%.

QHow has Huang Lichun's ETH futures trading strategy on Hyperliquid performed overall?

AInitially, Huang Lichun's 25x to 40x leveraged long ETH strategy on Hyperliquid was profitable, generating up to $45.66 million in unrealized gains. However, as ETH price dropped significantly from around $4,700 to the $1,600 range, those gains turned into substantial realized losses, with cumulative losses reaching $33.85 million and total trading losses over the past year exceeding $80 million.

QWhat nickname did the crypto community give Huang Lichun, and why?

AThe crypto community nicknamed Huang Lichun the 'King of Liquidations' because by March 2026, he had been liquidated over 335 times on his leveraged ETH positions.

QHow did Huang Lichun contribute to the popularity of BAYC NFTs in the Asian market?

AHuang Lichun significantly boosted the popularity of BAYC NFTs in the Asian market by minting dozens at the initial price of 0.08 ETH, accumulating a large collection, and gifting BAYC NFTs to top-tier celebrities like Jay Chou. His actions helped drive BAYC's 'floor price' from 0.08 ETH to over 100 ETH, earning him the title 'Godfather of the Apes' in the community.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

Anthropic has been discovered working on two new, previously unknown models codenamed "Marshmallow" (claude-marshmallow-eap) and "Melon" (claude-melon-eap), with early tests showing Marshmallow potentially surpassing Claude Opus 5 in conversational naturalness. Their emergence coincides with surprising new data revealing that Anthropic's flagship Fable 5 model, released two months ago as its strongest and most expensive offering, is being largely ignored by the enterprise market. According to spending data from Ramp tracking over 70,000 US companies, Fable 5 accounts for only about 11% of total token spending on Anthropic's models. This pales in comparison to OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 Sol, which commands roughly 25% of token spending in the same period. The tepid adoption is largely attributed to Fable 5's extremely high cost—double that of Opus 4.8 and ten times that of Haiku 4.5—without delivering proportionally superior performance for most business applications. Compounding the issue, the later-released Claude Opus 5, priced at half the cost of Fable 5, has achieved comparable or even better results in key benchmarks like programming and knowledge work, quickly surpassing Fable 5 in enterprise spending share. Furthermore, the rapid rise of powerful, low-cost open-source models—whose token usage share surged from 11% in April to 62% in August while costing less than 4% of enterprise AI budgets—applies additional pressure. Analysts suggest the sudden appearance of Marshmallow and Melon may be an urgent move by Anthropic to address this gap in its lineup. The goal is to offer models that are not only powerful but also cost-effective enough for businesses to adopt widely and sustainably, moving beyond a flagship that serves more as a showcase than a workhorse.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

Three months after the passing of his dog Rosie, AI entrepreneur Paul S. Conyngham secured $4 million in seed funding from Founders Fund for his new startup, Gamgee. The company aims to industrialize the experimental, AI-assisted process he pioneered to create a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for Rosie, who suffered from mast cell tumors. With no formal biology background, Conyngham used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to analyze Rosie's tumor DNA, identify target neoantigens, and design a custom mRNA vaccine sequence. Laboratory partners at UNSW produced the vaccine. Initial treatment showed tumor reduction, but Rosie's cancer later recurred and she was euthanized. Gamgee's goal is to streamline this "N-of-1" approach into a repeatable service for canine cancer patients, handling sequencing, vaccine design, production, and delivery. Clinical trials are planned in Australia in collaboration with research institutions. The company also eyes a longer-term vision of establishing personalized, mRNA-based medicine across species. The story highlights the broader challenge in personalized cancer treatment: compressing the entire timeline from design and regulatory approval to manufacturing and administration to match the patient's prognosis. While AI can accelerate target discovery, the remaining logistical and regulatory hurdles are significant. The article concludes by emphasizing that, for now, consulting qualified veterinary oncologists remains the responsible path for pet owners.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片