Major Altcoin ETFs See Sell-Offs by Grayscale Executives and Digital Currency Group

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-27Actualizado a 2026-01-27

Resumen

Senior executives at Grayscale and its parent company, Digital Currency Group (DCG), along with DCG International Investments, have sold significant portions of their holdings in several major cryptocurrency ETFs. Recent SEC filings reveal that Grayscale Chairman Barry Silbert and Chief Legal Officer Craig Salm sold shares in the Grayscale XRP Trust (GXRP). Additionally, DCG International sold positions in both the XRP Trust and the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL), while DCG itself reduced its stake in the Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). These sales suggest a potential shift in sentiment toward altcoin-based investment products. Despite these divestments, Grayscale continues to expand its ETF offerings, having recently filed for a BNB ETF and a NEAR ETF with the SEC. Meanwhile, the affected altcoins—XRP, SOL, and LINK—experienced mixed price movements and significant declines in trading volume, though their associated U.S. spot ETFs generally continued to see net inflows.

Grayscale officials, the firm’s parent company, Digital Currency Group, and DCG International Investments have recently cut their stakes in numerous high-profile crypto ETFs, indicating a possible shift in mood towards altcoin-linked investment products.

According to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, Grayscale Chairman Barry Silbert and Chief Legal Officer Craig Salm sold significant portions of their shares in the newly listed Grayscale XRP Trust (GXRP), as Silbert sold 9158 shares, and Salm sold 7123 shares.

While the DCG International Investments offloaded positions in both Grayscale XRP Trust, with 3000 shares, and sold 18,862 shares of Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL).

Moreover, Grayscale’s parent company, Digital Currency Group, trimmed its 2,822 shares in the Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK).

These major altcoin ETFs’ cut coincides with Grayscale’s recent entry into the crypto ETF space, which has filed for BNB ETF and NEAR ETF this month with the SEC, which signals continued expansion, even with selective portfolio adjustments.

Altcoins See Price Swings with ETF Inflows

After hitting an intraday high of almost $1.93, XRP is currently trading at $1.88. The volume of trading has decreased by almost 28% throughout the day. According to CMC statistics, the XRP’s price has ranged between a low of $1.88 and a high of $1.93 over this time.

Also, the U.S. spot XRP ETFs continue to see positive flows. As of January 26, it recorded $7.76 million inflow, and the cumulative net inflow stands at $1.24 billion, as per SoSoValue Data.

SOL is currently up 1.25% from the previous day and trading at $123.93. The token’s price has fluctuated within a narrow range today, reaching a high of over $125 during intraday trading, while its 24-hour trading volume has fallen by about 44%.

While the U.S. spot Solana ETF saw inflows for the past week, on January 26, it recorded $2.46 million inflow, with the cumulative total net inflow of $875.84 million.

While LINK is also down, where it is trading at $11.86, as the intra-day high was reached at $12. Whereas the 24-hour trading volume is declining by more than 40% in activity. Even the U.S. spot LINK ETF has also recorded an inflow of $1.08 million after 3 days of no movement in funds.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌Crypto Industry Targeted by North Korean Hackers Using AI Deepfake Meetings

TagsAltcoin ETFsGrayscale

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich major altcoin ETFs have seen sell-offs by Grayscale executives and Digital Currency Group?

AGrayscale executives and Digital Currency Group have sold shares in the Grayscale XRP Trust (GXRP), Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL), and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK).

QWhat was the specific amount of GXRP shares sold by Grayscale Chairman Barry Silbert?

AGrayscale Chairman Barry Silbert sold 9,158 shares of the Grayscale XRP Trust (GXRP).

QDespite the sell-offs, what action by Grayscale signals its continued expansion in the crypto ETF space?

ADespite the sell-offs, Grayscale's continued expansion is signaled by its recent filings with the SEC for a BNB ETF and a NEAR ETF.

QWhat was the net inflow recorded by U.S. spot XRP ETFs as of January 26, according to SoSoValue Data?

AAs of January 26, the U.S. spot XRP ETFs recorded a net inflow of $7.76 million, with a cumulative net inflow of $1.24 billion.

QHow did the 24-hour trading volume for SOL change on the day reported in the article?

AThe 24-hour trading volume for SOL fell by approximately 44% on the day reported in the article.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片