Lost the 75,000 Mark, Is Bitcoin About to Experience Its Final Drop?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-28Actualizado a 2026-05-28

Resumen

Bitcoin fell below the $75,000 support level on May 28th, trading near $74k amid a broader market correction. Major altcoins like ETH, NEAR, WLD, and ONDO also declined, with the market fear index dropping to 34. Over $470 million in liquidations occurred in 24 hours, mostly long positions. The downturn is linked to external pressures. Geopolitical tensions flared as the US conducted new strikes on an Iranian military base, impacting risk assets. Simultaneously, US spot Bitcoin ETFs shifted to consistent net outflows in May, indicating institutional profit-taking, with funds potentially rotating into outperforming AI and tech stocks. Analysts note BTC's long-term fundamentals remain sound. However, short-term price action depends on capital flows, which are currently negative. Key support is identified between $75k-$76k; a break below could lead to a test of $70k-$72k. On-chain data suggests short-term trading activity has plummeted to levels typical of bear market bottoms, signaling either a bottoming phase or a potential final decline before a reversal. Experts advise a diversified strategy as Bitcoin appears to be in a bottoming area.

Original Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 28, after repeated battles around the $75,000 mark, the price of Bitcoin finally lost its footing, now sliding to around $74,000. ETH is oscillating repeatedly around $2,000. Previously strong performers like NEAR, WLD, and ONDO have all seen pullbacks.

The market fear and greed index has currently fallen back to 34, indicating a state of panic.

Data from Coinglass shows that in the past 24 hours, $470 million worth of open interest contracts were liquidated across the network, with long positions accounting for $420 million of that.

Over the past several weeks, Bitcoin has been oscillating repeatedly between $75,000 and $80,000. It briefly attempted to break above $78,000 but failed to hold. In the past 30 days, BTC has fallen by 3.5%, ETH by about 12%, and stablecoins have also declined by 0.15%.

Regarding macro data, Brent crude oil rose slightly to $97 per barrel, silver fell slightly to $73, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 182.60 points (+0.36%) to a new record high. The S&P 500 index rose 1.24 points (+0.02%). The Nasdaq Composite Index stood at 26,674.73 points, up 18.55 points (+0.07%). Spot gold fell below $4,400 per ounce, the first time since March 27, losing over $50 intraday, a drop of 1.25%.

US-Iran Conflict "Reignites"

Geopolitical risks in the Middle East have become another significant external variable. Since 2026, tensions between the US, Iran, and related parties over issues like Iran's nuclear facilities and shipping security in the Strait of Hormuz have repeatedly escalated and eased. In recent months, the US has adopted a strategy combining military action with diplomatic pressure, accompanied by airstrikes, port blockade rumors, and repeated ceasefire negotiations.

Even during windows of ceasefire or diplomatic progress, market pricing for the risk of "reignition" has not completely subsided.

Early on May 28, US President Trump stated that the United States would continue to control Iran's assets. Iran has begun to provide us with what we want. If things don't go well, US Secretary of Defense Hagesse will finish the job. We can end the war with Iran very quickly, and perhaps we must do so. However, I don't think we need to.

Around 5:00 AM Beijing Time, according to reports from Iranian media Fars News, local residents said explosions were heard at Bandar Abbas port in southern Iran.

A US official told Reuters that the US military conducted new strikes on an Iranian military base posing a threat to US forces and commercial navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. US forces also intercepted and shot down multiple Iranian drones posing a threat to US forces and commercial maritime traffic.

Renewed tensions related to the Strait of Hormuz have come into focus, intensifying oil price volatility and putting pressure on global risk assets. In this environment, Bitcoin has exhibited more risk-asset characteristics rather than the traditional "digital gold" safe-haven function—geopolitical uncertainty boosts demand for the US dollar and US Treasuries while suppressing risk appetite, leading to capital outflows from the crypto market.

ETF Net Outflows Reveal Institutional Profit-Taking

Since their launch in early 2024, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen cumulative net inflows once exceeding $57 billion, becoming a major channel for institutional Bitcoin allocation. However, a clear reversal in flows has emerged since May 2026.

According to tracking data from SoSoValue, between May 5 and 26, US Bitcoin ETFs recorded consecutive net outflows, with daily outflow amounts ranging from tens of millions of dollars to a peak of $600 million, occurring twice.

The situation for spot Ethereum ETFs is similarly pessimistic, mirroring Bitcoin with substantial net outflows since early May.

This may not be simple "panic selling," but more likely systematic profit-taking by earlier gainers. ETF holders include traditional asset managers, family offices, and hedge funds, who have chosen to lock in profits via the redemption mechanism after Bitcoin's recovery from lows to the $75,000-$80,000 range. Some funds may have rotated into better-performing AI-related tech stocks—the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indices hitting new highs during the same period, while the crypto market underperformed overall, highlighting capital reallocation within risk assets.

Subsequent Trends

Wintermute published a post stating that BTC's consecutive two weeks of over $1 billion in ETF outflows (following six weeks of inflows) indicate institutions are capitalizing on strength to realize some recent positive returns. More noteworthy is AI. Nvidia delivered a textbook-level performance exceeding expectations, but there was almost no post-market movement. Incremental beats are no longer moving the needle. If the AI momentum fades, the macro picture (record-low consumer confidence, sticky inflation, a hawkish Fed under Governor Waller) will gain more weight, and cryptocurrencies will not be immune.

BTC's long-term structure remains sound (reserves at multi-year lows, long-term holders continue accumulating, CLARITY progressing, HYPE doing what major tokens should do early on). But short-term price is driven by capital flows, and currently, they are negative. The $75,000 to $76,000 range is a key line for BTC. Holding here, BTC will reattempt to assault $80,000; breaking below this range could lead to a quick slide towards $70,000 to $72,000.

glassnode tweeted that at a price of $76,000, approximately 7.75 million BTC are in a loss position. This supply overhang is a structural feature of bear markets and is typically only resolved when weak hands capitulate.

BIT tweeted that, regarding Bitcoin, the sustained rally over the past period largely depended on the interplay between institutional demand and market supply available for sale. Over the past year, Bitcoin spot ETFs and Strategy have been significant sources of such demand. When ETF inflows accelerated and Strategy continuously increased Bitcoin holdings, Bitcoin prices typically continued to rise.

BIT stated that the combined net purchases of ETFs and Strategy have now fallen to only $870 million, primarily due to significant ETF outflows, shifting from net buying to net selling. Before ETF inflows stabilize and rebound, Bitcoin may remain in a consolidation phase in the short term.

Analyst Murphy stated that using the on-chain indicator "Weight of Short-Term Capital Activity" (i.e., the USD value proportion represented by short-term coin turnover), one can observe the current state of the BTC market. This indicator reflects the latest short-term trading behaviors like speculation, arbitrage, profit-taking, or panic selling. Currently, this weight has fallen to historically extreme lows, only seen at the absolute bottom of bear markets in the past 15 years. This means short-term turnover has significantly cooled down, economic value is sedimenting towards long-term holdings, and the market is in a phase of low volatility, accumulation, or with pronounced bottoming characteristics.

Murphy's judgment, based on this, is that the current market might be in one of three phases: the bottom of a bear market; a sub-bottom, possibly with one last drop; or accumulation before a bull market launch. However, rational judgment can temporarily rule out pre-bull accumulation. It's currently not advisable to fully bet on a single scenario; a diversified portfolio strategy to cope with different outcomes is recommended. The relative position on the long-term macro direction indicates Bitcoin is near a bottom.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what happened to Bitcoin's price on May 28th and what is a key support level mentioned?

AOn May 28th, the Bitcoin price failed to hold above the $75,000 level and slipped to around $74,000. The article mentions that the $75,000 to $76,000 range is a critical line for Bitcoin; holding here could allow it to rechallenge $80,000, while breaking below could lead to a quick slide toward $70,000 to $72,000.

QWhat are the two main external factors cited in the article as contributing to the recent market pressure on cryptocurrencies?

AThe two main external factors are: 1) Renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, specifically between the US and Iran, which increases risk-off sentiment and strengthens the US dollar. 2) Sustained net outflows from US Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, indicating profit-taking by institutional investors.

QWhat does the analysis from Wintermute suggest about the relationship between the AI sector and cryptocurrency markets in the current context?

AWintermute suggests that the AI sector has been attracting capital. They note that if the momentum in AI stocks (exemplified by Nvidia) fades, the broader negative macro picture would gain more weight, and cryptocurrency markets would not be immune to the resulting pressure.

QAccording to analyst Murphy's on-chain indicator, what are the three possible market stages Bitcoin could currently be in?

ABased on the 'short-term fund activity weight on-chain' indicator, analyst Murphy suggests the current market could be in one of three stages: 1) The bottom of a bear market. 2) A secondary bottom, possibly before one final drop. 3) Accumulation before a bull market launch. However, he rationally excludes the bull market pre-accumulation scenario for now.

QWhat is the reported state of the market fear and greed index, and what does the data from Coinglass show about liquidations in the past 24 hours?

AThe market fear and greed index has fallen to 34, indicating a state of 'fear'. Coinglass data shows that over the past 24 hours, $470 million worth of contracts were liquidated across the network, with long positions accounting for $420 million of that total.

Lecturas Relacionadas

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报Hace 56 min(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报Hace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片