Liquid staking under the lens after Nasdaq files JitoSOL ETF rule change – Details

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-27Actualizado a 2026-02-27

Resumen

Nasdaq has filed with the SEC to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would be the first Solana spot ETF fully backed by a liquid staking token (LST). The fund aims to track the price of JitoSOL, a tradable asset users receive for staking SOL, allowing them to earn rewards without managing validators. The filing argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL, citing extremely high hourly price correlations (over 0.997) on major exchanges. This suggests the ETF introduces no new pricing risks beyond existing Solana ETFs. The SEC has 45 to 90 days to review the proposal. If approved, staking rewards would be reflected in the fund’s net asset value rather than distributed separately. This is the first U.S. filing for an LST-backed fund, though other products offering combined spot and staking exposure, like the REX-Osprey Solana ETF, already trade.

Nasdaq has submitted a filing to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), proposing a rule change to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF. This fund was announced on 22 August 2025 as the first Solana [SOL] Spot ETF 100% backed by a liquid staking token (LST). It aims to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

In liquid staking, users receive a tradable asset in return for staking crypto. Users staking SOL receive JitoSOL in return. These can be traded while still earning the on-chain rewards from the staked SOL. These users don’t need to run validators or manage their on-chain staking.

Correlation data cited to show JitoSOL as analogous to SOL

The goal of the Nasdaq filing was to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would hold JitoSOL directly. It submitted the proposal under Nasdaq Rule 5711(d), “which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.”

The exchange relied on the “generic listing standards” the SEC approved in September. By demonstrating a high price alignment and correlation between JitoSOL and SOL, with hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase, it argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL.

Therefore, the JitoSOL ETF does not bring new pricing risks not already present in the already-approved Solana ETF market.

The SEC’s review process gives the agency 45 days to approve or disapprove this proposal. This deadline can be extended to 90 days.

According to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately if the fund is approved. Instead, the rewards would reflect on the fund’s net asset value.

In August, JitoSOL had revealed that the Vaneck ETF filing was a result of months of collaborative policy outreach efforts with the SEC. This filing is still in the SEC’s exchange review stage. No liquid staking token fund is trading in the United States.

Other products that allow exposure to spot and staking rewards exist though. The REX-Osprey Solana + Staking ETF (SSK) began trading in early July. The REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) was launched in September.

Grayscale introduced staking for its Ethereum and Solana ETFs in October too.

Final Summary

The Nasdaq filing to the SEC is aimed at allowing the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL.
High price alignment between JitoSOL and SOL means the two assets are economically comparable.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the purpose of the rule change filing submitted by Nasdaq to the SEC?

AThe purpose of the Nasdaq filing is to propose a rule change to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, a fund that would be 100% backed by the liquid staking token JitoSOL.

QWhat is the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF designed to track, and how does it achieve this?

AThe Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is designed to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves by using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

QWhat key data did Nasdaq cite in its filing to argue that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL?

ANasdaq cited high hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase between JitoSOL and SOL to demonstrate their economic comparability.

QHow would staking rewards be handled for investors if the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is approved?

AAccording to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately but would instead be reflected in the fund's net asset value.

QWhat is the current status of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF filing and are there any similar funds trading in the U.S.?

AThe filing is currently in the SEC's exchange review stage, and no liquid staking token fund is currently trading in the United States.

Lecturas Relacionadas

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手Hace 31 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手Hace 31 min(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros