‘Let crypto bill die’ – Crypto VC cites stablecoin yields as red line

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-11Actualizado a 2026-01-11

Resumen

Some crypto industry leaders are expressing strong opposition to a potential stablecoin yield ban in the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Following reports that lawmakers are receptive to TradFi demands to restrict yields, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz criticized Congress for prioritizing bank profits over consumers. Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures stated that if stablecoin yields are killed, the entire bill should be allowed to die. However, Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes remains optimistic about the bipartisan negotiations. Key committees are set to mark up their versions of the bill on January 15th, covering SEC and CFTC oversight. The bill requires Democrat support to pass committee votes. Contentious issues include stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards. If the vote fails, it could sour market sentiment and delay progress until at least 2026 due to upcoming elections and crowded legislative calendars.

Some crypto industry leaders are disappointed following reports that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields.

According to reporter Sander Lutz, lawmakers are now receptive to TradFi demands to change stablecoin yield rules during bipartisan negotiations on the crypto market structure bill. The bill is scheduled for a markup on 15 January.

Reacting to the development, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz slammed the legislators, calling the update a “sad state.”

“Sad state that Congress cares more about banks margins than they do consumers! Both D’s and R’s need to ask who are they serving?”

For his part, Nic Carter, partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, said that the sector would be better off without the bill if stablecoin rewards are restricted.

“If they want to kill stablecoin yield we might as well just let the bill die.”

Bill Hughes, a lawyer at Consensys and one of the attendees at the meeting, acknowledged potential pitfalls. However, he remains optimistic about the crypto bill.

“For what it’s worth, I left the call more bullish than I had been previously. We are close. Pitfalls, for sure. But closer than we’ve ever been. And smart people calling the game. I’m optimistic.”

What to expect from crypto bill markup

Both the Senate Banking Committee and Senate Agriculture Committee are expected to markup their respective version of the crypto bill on 15 January. The Banking committee handles the SEC’s oversight mandate, while the Agriculture committee will cover the responsibility of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Although the bill is sponsored by Republicans, they must have Democrat buy-in to pass the committee vote before being advanced to the Senate chamber for a final floor vote.

For the Senate Banking group, the key contentious issues have been stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

Based on Carter and Novogratz’s reactions, it’s unclear whether yields or DeFi regulations will be deal-breakers.

However, according to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), Senate Banking Committee chair, it may be time to take the bill to the next step after “good-faith, bipartisan negotiations.”

What’s next if the vote fails?

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, recently reiterated that the bill needs 7-10 Democrats to pass the Senate Banking committee vote (A total of 60 YES votes needed to pass).

If the vote falters, it would have minimal impact. However, it will still sour market sentiment, he said. He also warned that another committee vote could be challenging in 2026.

“If the Senate falls short next week, the combination of crowded congressional calendars and looming midterm elections makes a second run in 2026 highly uncertain.”


Final Thoughts

  • TradFi’s demand to restrict stablecoin yields is reportedly gaining traction in Congress.
  • Failure to pass the committee vote on 15 January could throw the bill into limbo.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern of crypto industry leaders regarding the upcoming stablecoin bill?

ACrypto industry leaders are concerned and disappointed that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields, which they see as a major red line.

QWho is Mike Novogratz and what was his reaction to the proposed changes?

AMike Novogratz is the CEO of Galaxy. He slammed the legislators, calling the update a 'sad state' and accused Congress of caring more about bank margins than consumers.

QAccording to Nic Carter, what would be the consequence of restricting stablecoin yields in the bill?

ANic Carter, a partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, stated that if stablecoin yields are restricted, the sector would be better off letting the bill die.

QWhat are the key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee regarding the crypto bill?

AThe key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee are stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

QWhat did Alex Thorn say would happen if the Senate Banking committee vote fails on January 15?

AAlex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, said that if the vote fails, it would have minimal immediate impact but would sour market sentiment, and a second run in 2026 would be highly uncertain due to crowded congressional calendars and midterm elections.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

An article from Odaily Planet Daily, authored by Azuma, discusses a peculiar phenomenon observed on the prediction market platform Polymarket regarding the "2028 US Presidential Election" event. Despite having a real-time probability of less than 1%, unlikely candidates such as NBA star LeBron James (with $48.41 million in trading volume), celebrity Kim Kardashian ($33.84 million), and even ineligible figures like Elon Musk ($23.14 million) and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani ($18.39 million) account for approximately 70% of the total trading volume. In contrast, high-probability candidates like Vice President JD Vance ($10.58 million), California Governor Gavin Newsom ($15.71 million), and Secretary of State Marco Rubio ($9.32 million) have significantly lower trading activity. The article explains that this counterintuitive trend is not driven by irrational speculation but by rational strategies. Polymarket offers a 4% annualized holding reward for certain markets, including the 2028 election, to maintain long-term pricing accuracy. This yield exceeds the current 5-year US Treasury rate (3.98%), attracting large investors ("whales") to hold "NO" shares on low-probability candidates for risk-free returns. Additionally, some users utilize a platform feature that allows converting a set of "NO" shares into corresponding "YES" shares for better liquidity or pricing efficiency, rather than directly buying "YES" shares for their preferred candidates. Thus, the seemingly absurd trading activity is strategically motivated.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

"ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Blockchain as a Hardcore Libertarian Experiment" In a deep-dive interview, ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo reframes the essence of blockchain, arguing it is not merely a new technology or infrastructure but a hardcore libertarian experiment. This experiment, born from the 2008 financial crisis and decades of cypherpunk ideology, tests a fundamental question: to what extent can freedom and self-organization exist without centralized trust? The discussion highlights the experiment's verified outcomes. On one hand, it has proven its core value of censorship resistance, providing critical financial lifelines for entities like WikiLeaks and individuals in hyperinflationary or sanctioned countries via tools like stablecoins. However, Yang points out a key paradox: the most successful product, USDT, is itself a centralized compromise, showing users prioritize a less-controlled pipeline over pure decentralization. On the other hand, the experiment has exposed the severe costs of this freedom—a "dark forest" without safeguards. Events like the collapses of LUNA, Celsius, and FTX, resulting in massive wealth destruction and prison sentences for founders, underscore the system's fragility and the inherent risks of an unregulated environment. Yang observes that despite decentralized protocols, human nature inevitably recreates centralized power structures, speculative frenzies, and narrative-driven cycles (from ICOs to Meme coins), where emotion and belonging often trump technological substance. Looking forward, he believes blockchain's future is significant but niche. Its real value lies in serving specific, real-world needs for financial sovereignty and bypassing traditional controls, not as a universal infrastructure replacing all centralized systems. For the average participant, Yang's crucial advice is to cultivate independent judgment. True freedom is not holding a crypto wallet, but possessing a mind resilient to groupthink and narrative hype in a high-risk, often irrational market.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片