Leading Crypto VCs See Collective AUM Shrink: a16z Crypto Fund Management Scale Plummets 40%, Multicoin Halved

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-18Actualizado a 2026-04-18

Resumen

Headline: Top crypto funds including a16z Crypto and Multicoin saw their Assets Under Management (AUM) decline significantly in 2025, according to undisclosed SEC filings obtained by Fortune. Key Points: - a16z Crypto’s AUM dropped nearly 40% to $9.5 billion, partly due to returning capital to LPs at a market peak. Its first crypto fund achieved a 5.4x DPI. - Multicoin’s AUM was halved to approximately $2.7 billion, impacted by the crypto market downturn and its hybrid hedge/VC fund structure. - Pantera Capital also reduced AUM, influenced by successful exits including five portfolio company IPOs like Circle and BitGo. - Haun Ventures was the exception, with AUM growing over 30% to nearly $2.5 billion, driven by the successful acquisition of portfolio company BVNK by Mastercard. - Despite AUM contractions, major firms are raising new funds: Paradigm targeting up to $1.5 billion, a16z Crypto seeking up to $2 billion, and Dragonfly closing a $650 million fund. The data highlights the high volatility and cyclical nature of crypto VC investments, where AUM fluctuations are heavily tied to token prices and market cycles rather than solely reflecting fund performance.

Original Author: Ben Weiss

Original Compilation: Deep Tide TechFlow

Guide: Fortune reporters obtained a batch of previously undisclosed financial disclosure documents from the SEC for crypto VCs. The data shows that the Assets Under Management (AUM) of top firms like Paradigm, Pantera, a16z crypto, and Multicoin shrank across the board in 2025. However, the shrinkage isn't all bad news—a16z crypto returned money to LPs at the market peak, with its first fund's DPI reaching 5.4x. The only firm that bucked the trend was Haun Ventures, which capitalized on the stablecoin sector through BVNK's acquisition by Mastercard.

The leading players in crypto VC couldn't escape the market crash of 2025.

Fortune reporter Ben Weiss obtained a set of previously undisclosed investment advisor financial disclosure documents from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The data is straightforward: the AUM of top firms like Paradigm and Pantera Capital collectively shrunk in 2025.

But the 2025 downturn pushed it back down. From 2024 to 2025, Multicoin's AUM was more than halved, dropping to approximately $2.7 billion. Since BTC began its plunge in October 2025, crypto assets have retreated across the board, and a structure like Multicoin's, which operates both hedge funds and VC funds, was hit particularly hard.

Additional context: Multicoin co-founder Kyle Samani left the company in February of this year to focus on other areas of technology investment.

Pantera: Five Portfolio Companies IPO, Capital Returned to LPs

Pantera Capital's AUM also shrank, but similar to a16z, part of the reason was主动 distributions back to LPs.

This institution, founded by former a16z crypto partner Katie Haun, saw its AUM increase by over 30% year-over-year, approaching $2.5 billion. On one hand, it was due to betting on the right sector—its investment in the stablecoin company BVNK was acquired by Mastercard for up to $1.8 billion. On the other hand, Haun Ventures itself also raised a new $1 billion fund in 2025.

Although AUM has shrunk, leading institutions have not stopped:

Paradigm is raising a new fund of up to $1.5 billion. a16z crypto is raising up to $2 billion. Dragonfly just closed its fourth fund of $650 million. Post-publication correction from Fortune: A Dragonfly spokesperson actually responded, confirming the data is "accurate" and stating "we are actively deploying capital".

Spokespersons for Paradigm, Pantera, a16z crypto, Multicoin, and Haun Ventures all declined to comment.

The Cyclical Destiny of Crypto VCs

The original article ends here, but a few background points are worth adding.

Crypto VCs are fundamentally different from traditional tech VCs. Traditional VCs invest in equity, with exits via IPO or M&A. Many crypto startups have their own tokens, exposing the VC's holdings directly to token price volatility.

According to Pantera Capital's outlook report earlier this year, the total crypto market cap excluding BTC (and excluding ETH and stablecoins) fell by about 44% from its late 2024 high. But following historical patterns, bear markets are also windows of opportunity for buying the dip. The密集 fund-raising by several leading institutions at this moment is a bet on the next cycle.

According to a previous Fortune exclusive, a16z crypto's fifth fund is planned to complete fundraising in the first half of 2026, led by Chris Dixon, and will continue to fully bet on the blockchain direction. Paradigm's new fund, according to The Wall Street Journal, will expand into AI and robotics technology. The divergence in the two strategies is clear: a16z continues all-in on crypto, while Paradigm chooses to hedge across sectors.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the SEC filings obtained by Fortune, which major crypto VC firms experienced a significant decline in AUM in 2025?

AAccording to the SEC filings, major crypto VC firms including Paradigm, Pantera Capital, a16z crypto, and Multicoin all experienced significant declines in their Assets Under Management (AUM) in 2025.

QWhy did a16z crypto's AUM drop by nearly 40%, and what positive outcome did this represent?

Aa16z crypto's AUM dropped by nearly 40% partly because the firm began distributing returns from its first three funds back to its Limited Partners (LPs), intentionally doing so at a market high in 2025. The positive outcome was that its first crypto fund achieved a net DPI (Distributed to Paid-In capital) of 5.4x, representing strong returns for its investors.

QWhat was the primary reason for Haun Ventures being the only firm to see an increase in AUM, and by how much did it grow?

AHaun Ventures was the only firm to see an increase in AUM, growing by over 30% to nearly $2.5 billion. This growth was primarily due to a successful investment in the stablecoin company BVNK, which was acquired by Mastercard for up to $1.8 billion, and the firm's own fundraising of a new $1 billion fund in 2025.

QHow does the article explain the fundamental difference between crypto VC and traditional tech VC that leads to such volatile AUM changes?

AThe article explains that the fundamental difference is that traditional VCs invest in equity and exit via IPO or acquisition, while many crypto startups have their own tokens. This means a crypto VC's holdings are directly exposed to the extreme volatility of token prices, leading to massive swings in AUM that are unimaginable in traditional venture capital.

QDespite the AUM declines, what actions are firms like Paradigm and a16z crypto taking, indicating their continued belief in the market?

ADespite the AUM declines, firms like Paradigm and a16z crypto are actively raising new funds, indicating their continued belief in the market. Paradigm is raising a new fund of up to $1.5 billion, and a16z crypto is raising a new fund of up to $2 billion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 21 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 21 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

The article presents the vision of using AI not as a simple chatbot, but as a personalized operating system that creates compounding value. The author, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, details his system, built on open-source tools, which continuously structures all his inputs—meetings, books, emails—into a vast, interconnected "second brain." He describes concrete examples like "book mirroring," where a book's content is analyzed and mapped to his personal context, and automated meeting preparation that leverages accumulated knowledge. The core philosophy is "skillification": turning recurring tasks into reusable, self-improving "skills" that form the system's building blocks. A key insight is the "meta-skill" that creates new skills, ensuring continuous improvement. The architecture consists of a thin "harness" for routing, thick "skills" for specific tasks, and thick "data"—a 100,000-page knowledge base. The author argues the future belongs to individuals who build such personalized, compounding AI systems, not just those using centralized tools. He concludes by encouraging readers to start building their own systems using the open-sourced framework he provides.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros