‘Last Chance’: US Crypto Policy Hits Critical Deadline, Senator Says

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-04-12Actualizado a 2026-04-12

Resumen

US Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned that the current legislative session is the "last chance until at least 2030" to pass the CLARITY Act, a key piece of market-structure legislation for digital assets. The bill, which aims to provide clear regulatory rules for the crypto industry, faces a critical deadline as November midterm elections threaten to shift congressional priorities. Industry leaders, including Coinbase's Paul Grewal and Brian Armstrong, and a16z Crypto's Chris Dixon, are pushing for its passage, arguing that regulatory clarity will boost innovation and consumer protection. However, a major obstacle remains: a dispute over how to handle stablecoin yield. Despite growing support from companies and some regulators, this unresolved issue could prevent the bill from advancing. The act is seen as a test of Washington's ability to establish crypto regulations before the political window closes.

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said the CLARITY Act could be nearing a markup hearing in the Senate Banking Committee, but he tied that progress to one unresolved issue: the dispute over crypto and stablecoin yield.

That came as the broader push for the bill picked up new urgency from lawmakers and industry figures who fear the window for action is closing fast.

Deadline Pressure Builds

US Senator Cynthia Lummis said the country may not get another serious shot at the bill before 2030.

In a post on X on Friday, she said this was the “last chance” to pass the CLARITY Act until at least that year and warned against letting the country’s financial future slip away.

Her warning landed at a sensitive moment. Industry participants have grown more uneasy about the bill’s prospects this year, with November midterm elections threatening to shift congressional priorities and slow work on crypto legislation.

Lummis’ comments framed the fight as one that cannot sit on the shelf much longer.

David Sacks, the former White House AI and crypto czar, echoed that view a day earlier. He said Senate Banking, followed by the full Senate, should pass market-structure legislation and said he believes US President Donald Trump would sign it into law.

Industry Push Gathers Steam

The pressure is not coming from lawmakers alone. Chris Dixon, a16z Crypto’s managing partner, said rules that are clearly defined help both consumers and entrepreneurs.

That line has become a common argument inside the industry, where many firms say clearer oversight would help the US pull in more innovation and more retail demand for crypto assets.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.4 trillion. Chart: TradingView

That view has spread across different corners of the sector. Immutable founder Robbie Ferguson said on April 3 that the CLARITY Act could make the past decade of gaming growth look small by comparison.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also shifted his tone on Friday, saying it was time for the bill to move after months of delays.

Stablecoin Fight Still Looms

Even with that momentum, a key problem remains. Grewal said on April 2 that the bill may be close to a Senate Banking Committee markup, but he also said the path forward depends on agreement over stablecoin yield.

That issue has kept the legislation from moving cleanly, even as support has built among companies and some regulators.

Regulators are now adding their voices too. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the time had come for Congress to move market-structure legislation to Trump’s desk and to protect the system from what he called rogue regulators.

The CLARITY Act has since become a test of whether Washington can settle crypto rules before the political calendar closes in.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the crypto legislation that US Senator Cynthia Lummis says is facing a 'last chance' to pass before 2030?

AThe CLARITY Act.

QAccording to the article, what is the key unresolved issue that is holding up the progress of the CLARITY Act?

AThe dispute over crypto and stablecoin yield.

QWhich US President does the article mention as someone who would potentially sign the market-structure legislation into law?

APresident Donald Trump.

QWho is cited in the article as saying that clearly defined rules help both consumers and entrepreneurs?

AChris Dixon, a16z Crypto's managing partner.

QWhat event is threatening to shift congressional priorities and slow down work on crypto legislation this year?

AThe November midterm elections.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片