Source: Insightful Commentary
JPMorgan Global Market Strategy: What Signals Are Commodities Sending Us? February 5, 2026
The chaotic start to February raises a question: Is the volatility in commodity markets a precursor to future trends, or merely an adjustment?
We believe this is a healthy adjustment, not a turning point, presenting buying opportunities for metals, while expecting further declines in the energy sector.
Although global growth is recovering and manufacturing activity is shifting, providing support on the demand side, the divergence between energy and metals primarily stems from different supply dynamics.
From gold and silver to copper and Bitcoin, all commodity prices plummeted last Friday, marking the most significant market turmoil since last November. Gold experienced its sharpest single-day drop since 1983, falling over 9%, while silver plunged 26%, its largest single-day decline on record. Grain and livestock futures also crashed amid the turmoil in the precious metals market.
The sell-off continued into Monday, pressuring energy markets: global natural gas prices collapsed, and oil prices recorded their largest drop in six months. Precious metals selling accelerated after U.S. and Chinese exchanges raised margin requirements, compounded by a wave of seasonal selling ahead of the Lunar New Year, exacerbating the decline.
Overall, commodities lost nearly 8% in a brutal three-day plunge, with U.S. natural gas prices plummeting 57%, silver falling 33%, gold dropping 13%, and both copper and oil declining 7%. This intense volatility persisted into mid-week, with prices falling again after a rebound due to choppy trading (Figures 1 and 2). The commodity decline dragged U.S. stock index futures lower, while Asian stocks suffered their worst two-day drop since last April on Monday.
Figure 1: Year-to-date performance of gold, silver, Shanghai copper, and Brent crude oil prices
Figure 2: 10-year z-score of cross-asset volatility
This week's chaotic start raises the question: Is the commodity sell-off a precursor to future trends, or merely an adjustment?
We believe it is not a turning point but a healthy adjustment, a buying opportunity for metals, with more selling expected in energy.
1. The first argument revolves around the recovery in global growth
Since the fourth quarter of last year, a clear pro-cyclical rotation has emerged in global markets, reflected in metals, equities, and foreign exchange. This recovery is a direct result of:
· Less restrictive monetary policies in developed countries (Figure 3)
· Expansionary fiscal policies in most major economies. In the U.S., the Congressional Budget Office predicts that legislative measures like the "Bundle of Goodness Act" will boost U.S. growth by 0.9%. Expansionary fiscal policy is not unique to the U.S. The IMF estimates that fiscal measures will push growth in Germany by 1% and Japan by 0.5% in 2026. Ultimately, fiscal policy in the G3 economies will be highly expansionary in the coming quarters.
· Significant upside catalysts for U.S. growth and inflation as headwinds from trade wars and immigration restrictions fade. Strong AI and data center spending, along with high AI stock prices, are boosting the wealth effect for consumers. Additional tailwinds include a weaker dollar and (until recently) falling oil prices, as well as economic stimulus from hosting the World Cup and activities related to the U.S. Semiquincentennial.
The "Bundle of Goodness Act" further supports the outlook by cutting taxes on overtime and consumption, increasing the child tax credit, and extending full expensing for equipment and plants, which is increasing household rebates and driving a capital expenditure boom (Figure 4).
Figure 3: Official policy rates in developed countries
Figure 4: U.S. non-defense capital goods (excluding aircraft) spending
2. Global manufacturing activity is turning
Recent PMI data confirm that a global growth rebound is underway and broadening, supported by global monetary easing and a surge in tech investment. The increase in the number of economies reporting higher output is particularly encouraging. In developed markets, the U.S. recorded its strongest ISM manufacturing data since August 2022, Japan showed significant improvement, and Western Europe clearly strengthened. While China's output PMI was largely unchanged, the key bellwether of emerging Asia ex-China saw substantial growth. Overall, the global PMI is running at a solid, above-trend pace, with rising new orders providing constructive signals for the sustainability of the recovery.
3. Given the reassessment of global growth, the 2026 reflation trade has unfolded, with commodities, materials, and industrial stocks performing well
Based on the relationship between copper prices and the global manufacturing PMI over the past fifteen years, the magnitude of the recent copper price increase suggests a PMI reading near 53—well above the latest data of around 50.5 and more optimistic than any other cyclically sensitive market we track. While copper's year-on-year performance may exaggerate the market's pro-cyclical optimism, other markets also clearly show a degree of optimism. For example, a simulated basket of semiconductor stocks (showing similar explanatory power over the same period, R-squared around 0.42) suggests the PMI will rise to around 52 by the end of Q1 2026. The sustained bullish trend in this stock basket after breaking out of a multi-year range indicates that the pro-cyclical component of market trends remains strong, despite recent short-term reversals in metals (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 5: Copper price vs. global manufacturing PMI
Figure 6: Semiconductor stock basket vs. global manufacturing PMI
4. However, the similarities within commodities end here
The sharp correction in precious metals prices last week was triggered by a dollar rebound (following the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair), but the severity of the pullback was more due to the rapid unwinding of massive long positions quickly built up after prices accelerated unsustainably and became overextended in the prior two weeks. In short, prices went too far, too fast, with short-term momentum indicators jumping to levels rare in precious metals markets.
In contrast, the 11% rise in Bloomberg Energy prices since the start of the year was driven by temporary factors like weather and geopolitical escalation. A massive winter storm and freezing temperatures in parts of the U.S. caused production disruptions and boosted heating fuel demand, while cold weather in Europe disrupted oil loadings and depleted gas storage. However, the most significant impact on oil prices was the escalation of tensions with Iran, which we do not expect to be lasting given this is a U.S. midterm election year.
Looking through the current volatility, we remain bullish on gold and copper while maintaining a lower outlook for energy prices—a divergence driven primarily by different supply dynamics.
5. Staying bullish on gold; copper's fundamental peak is still ahead
Staying bullish on gold. As we have seen over the past six months, this long-term rally in gold is not linear, nor will it be in the future, and we continue to view such pullbacks as healthy and necessary, not a challenge to our structural bullish view. In fact, as gold remains a dynamic, multi-faceted portfolio hedge with a clear structural story, we have already seen physical bargain-hunting emerge.
Beyond recent support from retail investors, we continue to expect central banks to remain steadfast as significant bargain buyers, and we now forecast official net purchases to reach 800 tonnes of gold this year, still 70% above pre-2022 levels (Figure 7).
Overall, we continue to see room for the gold diversification trend to run further, as in an environment where physical assets continue to outperform paper assets, we expect demand from both central banks and investors this year to be sufficient to ultimately push gold to $6,300 per ounce by the end of 2026 (Figure 8).
Figure 7: Central bank quarterly gold purchases
</section></div><script type=)
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is J.P. Morgan's overall view on the recent commodity market sell-off, and what opportunities do they see?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"J.P. Morgan views the sell-off as a healthy correction rather than a trend reversal. They see it as a buying opportunity for metals like gold and copper, while expecting further declines in the energy sector."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"According to the report, what are the key factors driving the divergence between metal and energy commodities?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The divergence is primarily driven by different supply dynamics. Metals are supported by structural stories and central bank buying, while the energy price surge was fueled by temporary factors like severe weather and geopolitical tensions."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is J.P. Morgan's specific year-end price target for gold and the main reasons supporting this bullish outlook?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"J.P. Morgan maintains a bullish outlook on gold with a price target of $6,300 per ounce by the end of 2026. This is supported by expectations of strong demand from both central banks (forecasting 800 tons of net official purchases) and investors seeking portfolio diversification."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why is the bank more cautious on silver compared to gold in the short term?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The bank is more cautious on silver because it is a smaller, more volatile market that lacks central banks as structural buyers. Its relatively higher valuation compared to gold makes it at risk for a deeper correction and two-way overshoot risk."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How much geopolitical risk premium does J.P. Morgan estimate is currently priced into oil, and what is their expectation for it?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"J.P. Morgan estimates that oil prices contain about $7 per barrel of geopolitical premium, largely due to escalated tensions between the US and Iran. They expect this premium to fade, as they do not a lasting disruption to oil supply, allowing prices to fall back towards fair value."}}]}
Preguntas relacionadas
QWhat is J.P. Morgan's overall view on the recent commodity market sell-off, and what opportunities do they see?
AJ.P. Morgan views the sell-off as a healthy correction rather than a trend reversal. They see it as a buying opportunity for metals like gold and copper, while expecting further declines in the energy sector.
QAccording to the report, what are the key factors driving the divergence between metal and energy commodities?
AThe divergence is primarily driven by different supply dynamics. Metals are supported by structural stories and central bank buying, while the energy price surge was fueled by temporary factors like severe weather and geopolitical tensions.
QWhat is J.P. Morgan's specific year-end price target for gold and the main reasons supporting this bullish outlook?
AJ.P. Morgan maintains a bullish outlook on gold with a price target of $6,300 per ounce by the end of 2026. This is supported by expectations of strong demand from both central banks (forecasting 800 tons of net official purchases) and investors seeking portfolio diversification.
QWhy is the bank more cautious on silver compared to gold in the short term?
AThe bank is more cautious on silver because it is a smaller, more volatile market that lacks central banks as structural buyers. Its relatively higher valuation compared to gold makes it at risk for a deeper correction and two-way overshoot risk.
QHow much geopolitical risk premium does J.P. Morgan estimate is currently priced into oil, and what is their expectation for it?
AJ.P. Morgan estimates that oil prices contain about $7 per barrel of geopolitical premium, largely due to escalated tensions between the US and Iran. They expect this premium to fade, as they do not a lasting disruption to oil supply, allowing prices to fall back towards fair value.
Lecturas Relacionadas
The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage
The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation.
At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously.
Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees.
The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.
链捕手Hace 17 min(s)
链捕手Hace 17 min(s)
Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?
Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics.
Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function.
The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely.
This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement.
The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries.
The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell.
The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.
marsbitHace 25 min(s)
marsbitHace 25 min(s)
Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss
Trump Media & Technology Group, parent company of Truth Social, reported a massive $406 million net loss in Q1 2026, sharply up from $31.7 million a year earlier. The collapse was driven primarily by $370 million in unrealized losses from digital asset investments. These include a $61 million loss on 756 million Cronos tokens and a nearly $500 million gap on 9,542 Bitcoin purchased near the 2025 market peak, though Bitcoin's recent recovery has reduced that paper loss.
Adding to turmoil, CEO Devin Nunes resigned in late April. Meanwhile, the company's core media revenue was only $871,200, a minimal increase. Despite the financial losses, the company generated $18 million in operating cash flow by selling options on its pledged Bitcoin holdings. Its stock, once valued at over $97, now trades around $9, reflecting a more than 90% decline from its 2022 peak.
bitcoinistHace 31 min(s)
bitcoinistHace 31 min(s)
Bitcoin Volatility Returns as Price Tests Critical Indicator Level
Bitcoin experienced significant volatility, briefly surpassing $82,000 before falling back to around $80,000. This triggered over $400 million in liquidations within 24 hours, though the price later recovered moderately above $81,000. The key focus is Bitcoin's approach to the critical 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a major resistance level near $82,580 that has repeatedly capped price advances since November 2025. Analyst Brett suggests a sustained break above this level could signal the end of the bear market. However, failure to breach it has historically led to sharp declines, with an average drop of 30% from this rejection zone. If this pattern repeats, Bitcoin's price could potentially fall to around $56,600 from current levels. Despite the price pressure, cryptocurrency investment products saw a sixth consecutive week of inflows totaling $4.9 billion, supported by positive sentiment around US crypto legislation.
TheNewsCryptoHace 56 min(s)
TheNewsCryptoHace 56 min(s)
Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build
Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership.
Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector.
While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI.
He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all.
Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.
marsbitHace 1 hora(s)
marsbitHace 1 hora(s)
