Is CRCL Expensive Now? Calculating Circle's Stock Price Using the DCF Valuation Model

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

**Title: Is CRCL Expensive Now? A DCF Valuation Analysis of Circle's Stock** **Summary:** This analysis uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to estimate the fair value of Circle (CRCL) stock, focusing on its USDC stablecoin business. Key assumptions include: USDC circulation of $70 billion by end-2025, growing at an average annual rate of 15% from 2026 to 2035; a 2.5% average benchmark interest rate; 38% gross margin; fixed operating costs of $500 million in 2025, increasing 10% annually; 24% effective tax rate; 10% discount rate; and a terminal PE multiple of 20. The fully diluted share count is 275 million. The model calculates EBITDA as interest income (USDC circulation × interest rate × margin) minus fixed costs. Free cash flow (FCF) is derived after taxes. The present value of explicit FCF (2026–2035) is $2.282 billion, and the terminal value (2035 FCF × 20) discounted to 2026 is $7.138 billion. The total enterprise value (EV) is $9.42 billion, implying a fair stock price of $34.25 per share as of January 2026. Sensitivity analysis shows that if USDC growth averages 20% annually, the fair value rises to ~$62 per share, suggesting potential margin of safety at current prices (around $62 in early February 2026). However, short-term volatility, forced sellers, and leverage risks are highlighted. The model is conservative, excluding other revenue streams (e.g., Circle’s emerging products like Arc chain) and emphasizing USDC’s growth and competitive sustainability...

Author: @lufeieth

Preface

This is merely a thought experiment for reference only. Welcome to exchange and clash of views. Not investment advice. Profit or loss is your own responsibility.

Valuing Circle (CRCL) is not easy, especially using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Key parameters can vary significantly with slight changes. We can only attempt to find some vague correctness under a relatively conservative approach.

Sending the following prompt to ChatGPT and Gemini yields the same numbers.

Prompt:

According to:Circle's EBITDA ≈ USDC Issuance Scale * USD Benchmark Interest Rate * 38% Gross Margin - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

Specific numbers:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance is calculated based on 70 billion.

If from January 2026, over 10-year period (2026-2035), USDC issuance is assumed to grow at an average annual rate of 15%.

Use the average annual USDC issuance (not the year-end issuance) to calculate interest and EBITDA.

Annual USD benchmark interest rate is assumed to be 2.5%.

Annual fixed operating costs: $500 million for 2025, assumed to increase by 10% annually from 2026 onwards.

Effective tax rate is assumed to be 24%.

PE multiple is assumed to be 20x.

Fully diluted share count is assumed to be 275 million shares.

Discount rate is assumed to be 10%.

Calculate CRCL's free cash flow, enterprise value, and reasonable stock price discounted back to January 2026.

I. Explanation of Parameters Used in the Valuation Model

1. Gross Margin:

Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed a gross margin of 39.5%. We use 38% for calculation.

Circle names its key operating metric as RLDC in its performance materials. RLDC is defined as Total Revenue and Reserve Income minus Total Distribution, Transaction, and Other Costs.

RLDC Margin is defined as RLDC divided by Total Revenue and Reserve Income.

2. Benchmark Interest Rate:

As of February 2026, the federal funds rate is 3.5-3.75%. The future path is unknown. We assume an average of 2.5% for the next 10 years.

3. Fixed Operating Costs:

The company's 2025 fixed cost guidance is $495-$510 million. We use $500 million, growing at 10% annually. (Reference: VISA, MA fixed cost growth around 10% in 2025).

4.PE

Multiple:

For CRCL, we use a 10-year average PE of 20x. (Reference: VISA, MA average 10-year PE valuation is 27-35x).

5. USDC Issuance:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance was 75.3 billion, but as of February 1, 2026, it was 70.2 billion. We use 70 billion as the base for calculation.

6. Average Annual Growth Rate of USDC Issuance:

This is the largest variable. First calculated at 15%. Later there is a table showing different valuations corresponding to growth rates from 10% to 40%.

7. Effective Tax Rate:

"Income tax expense or benefit" divided by "pre-tax profit", reflecting the comprehensive tax burden level under the current profit structure. Circle's Q2, Q3 2025 reports showed negative values due to tax credits and exemptions, making it un-referenceable. Temporarily use 24%.

8. Fully Diluted Share Count:

Basic Shares: Refers to the "number of issued and outstanding common shares", the total number of shares actually held by shareholders and existing at a specific disclosure point.

As of November 6, 2025, Circle had issued and outstanding Class A: 216,487,160 shares, Class B: 18,988,431 shares, totaling 235,475,591 shares.

Fully Diluted Shares: Based on basic shares, plus currently existing potential dilutive items, a more commonly used metric for per-share valuation, accounting for currently existing potential dilutive instruments. Includes:

1 Shares corresponding to the granted portion of equity incentives: 35,413,000 shares.

2 Shares issuable related to M&A, subject to service period conditions, etc.: 1,744,000 shares.

3 Potential shares from convertible notes: 1,125,000 shares.

4 Potential shares related to warrants: 1,248,000 shares.

Total approximately 275,005,591 shares, or about 275 million shares.

There is also a Maximum Fully Diluted Share Count (stress test口径, including future un-granted incentive pool):

On top of the 275 million shares, add the "future equity incentive pool available for grant" of 31,348,000 shares. Total approximately 306,353,591 shares, or about 306 million shares.

Our model uses the fully diluted share count of 275 million.

Sections II, III, and IV below are the calculation results:

II. Units and Definitions

1. Unit Explanation

(1) All amounts in the table below are in "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(2) USDC issuance scale uses "Average Balance for the Year", unit is "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(3) Stock price unit is "USD per share".

2. Calculation Chain

(1) Annual Interest Benchmark Income = Average USDC Balance for the Year × 2.5%

(2) Retained Gross Profit = Interest Benchmark Income × 38%

(3) EBITDA ≈ Retained Gross Profit − Annual Fixed Operating Costs

(4) Taxes = max(EBITDA, 0) × 24%

(5) FCF ≈ EBITDA − Taxes

(6) Discount rate 10%, discounting annual year-end cash flows back to January 2026

(7) Terminal Value at end of 2035 = 2035 FCF × PE 20x

(8) Fully Diluted Shares = 275 million shares

III. Annual Free Cash Flow from 2026 to 2035 (Hundreds of Millions of USD)

Total Present Value of Explicit Period FCF (2026 to 2035) approximately $2.282 Billion.

IV. Enterprise Value and Reasonable Stock Price as of January 2026 (Based on Fully Diluted 275M Shares)

1、Terminal Value at end of 2035

(1) 2035 FCF = $926 Million

(2) Terminal Value = 9.26 × 20 = $18.513 Billion

(3) Present Value of Terminal Value = 185.13 ÷ 1.1^10 = $7.138 Billion

2、Enterprise Value EV (Discounted to January 2026)

(1) EV = Explicit Period PV 2.282 + Terminal Value PV 7.138 = $9.420 Billion

3、Reasonable Stock Price Discounted to January 2026

(1) Per Share Value = $9.420 Billion ÷ 275 million shares = $34.25 per share

4、A Checkpoint

(1) The present value of the terminal value accounts for approximately 75.8%, which means the valuation is highly sensitive to the 38% retention rate, fixed cost path, and terminal multiple.

V. Summary of Results under Different USDC Average Annual Growth Rates (2026–2035 Explicit Period, 2035 Terminal Value at PE=20, 10% Discount)

Explanation:

(1) Under different scenarios of USDC average annual growth rate from 10% to 40% (increasing by 1%), calculate the enterprise value (EV) and reasonable stock price discounted to January 2026.

(2) EV in the table below is the enterprise value discounted to January 2026, Stock Price = EV ÷ 275 million shares (fully diluted shares).

(3) Units: 2035 year-end USDC scale and EV are in Billions USD (B USD), stock price is in USD/share.

In the table above, 20% is highlighted in red. This means: under conservative estimates, if you believe the future average annual growth rate of USDC can reach 20%, then the current CRCL price of $62 (as of 22:00, February 2, 2026, half an hour before opening) might have a slight margin of safety.

Note: Even if there might be a slight margin of safety, it does not mean it won't fall further. And I also hope it will fall further. It might still fall a lot. Because many factors affect short-term stock price fluctuations, such as the

forced sellers' forced selling behavior

. If you use on-exchange leverage, you might even get liquidated to zero. Remember:

"Preserve principal, don't go to zero."

Do not use leverage. Otherwise, the future has nothing to do with you.

VI. Some Explanations

1. The parameters used in the model are relatively conservative,只是想看看在保守估算下合理的估值是多少。大家可以修改具体的数字,发给chatGPT或Gemini直接计算。

2. The model only considers USDC's reserve interest income and does not include other income items. Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed other income items as $29 million. Because it's difficult to estimate growth, for conservative estimation, the model did not include them.

3. Products mentioned in Circle's 2026 product vision

, such as the Arc chain, CPN network, xReserve, StableFX, etc., and their potential future income are not included in the model and can be regarded as unvalued upside options.

4. The biggest variable and core question affecting the model's valuation becomes:

  • How large do you think the scale of stablecoins, USDC, will be in 5, 10 years? Can the average annual growth rate of USDC reach 20%?

  • Will Circle still be the leading compliant stablecoin? And maintain its share in an environment of increasing regulation and competition?

5. Although the market generally believes that trends like cross-border payments, "dollarization" in the third world, tokenized stocks, on-chain treasuries, RWA, prediction markets, and even AI Agent payments will benefit stablecoins, for investors who need to put real money on the line, cognition and logic are just the starting point.

What truly determines position sizing and the ability to hold on during volatility is the continuous emergence of trackable, verifiable facts and evidence. Conclusions need to be sought and verified by each individual. Only by holding the chain of evidence in your own hands can you have the capability and determination to resist the fluctuations and noise that will inevitably appear in the future.

VII. Appendix Reference: USDC vs USDT Growth Table Past 6 Years (2020–2025)

Explanation

1. Issuance caliber: Circulation量 as of December 31 each year, unit is Hundreds of Millions of USD

2. YoY Growth Rate: Current year-end ÷ Previous year-end − 1

3. Mind Decoding Content: Added according to the original text of the image you sent

4. "Average Annualized Growth Rate" calculated as CAGR (5 annual intervals) from end-2020 to end-2025

For reference only, to have an intuitive perception of the order of magnitude. Does not represent future growth rates.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key formula used to calculate Circle's EBITDA in the DCF model?

AThe formula used is: EBITDA ≈ (USDC Issuance Size × USD Benchmark Interest Rate × 38% Gross Margin) - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

QWhat is the assumed average annual growth rate for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035 in the base case scenario?

AThe base case scenario assumes an average annual growth rate of 15% for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035.

QWhat is the calculated fair value per share of CRCL as of January 2026 under the model's base assumptions?

AThe calculated fair value per share is $34.25, based on a fully diluted share count of 275 million shares.

QAccording to the analysis, at what USDC annual growth rate does the $62 share price (as of Feb 2, 2026) potentially offer a margin of safety?

AThe $62 share price is highlighted as potentially having a small margin of safety if the future average annual USDC growth rate is 20%.

QWhat are the two major uncertainties or 'core questions' identified that will ultimately determine Circle's valuation?

AThe two core questions are: 1) How large will the stablecoin and USDC market be in the next 5-10 years, and can USDC maintain a 20% average annual growth rate? 2) Will Circle remain the leading compliant stablecoin and maintain its market share amidst increasing regulation and competition?

Lecturas Relacionadas

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片