Interesting Moves by Cryptocurrency Exchanges Regarding a Popular Memecoin! Upbit Delists It, Bithumb Removes It from Watch List!

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-07Actualizado a 2026-08-07

Resumen

Two major South Korean crypto exchanges, Upbit and Bithumb, have announced contrasting decisions regarding the popular Solana-based memecoin Bonk ($BONK). Upbit will delist $BONK, removing all trading pairs from its platform on September 7th at 09:00. Users must manage their transactions and asset transfers accordingly, as trading will cease. Conversely, Bithumb has taken a more positive step by removing $BONK from its watchlist, effectively ending a previous trading warning and continuing to support the token on its platform. These divergent actions highlight that crypto projects are evaluated individually by each exchange. A delisting decision from one platform does not automatically extend to others. As a leading memecoin known for high price volatility, listing and delisting decisions on major exchanges can significantly impact a token's price and trading volume. Market participants are closely watching for any further announcements from other Korean exchanges as Upbit's delisting date approaches. The article concludes by stating this is not investment advice.

Upbit and Bithumb, two leading South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, have announced different decisions regarding the popular memecoin Bonk ($BONK). Upbit announced the termination of trading support for $BONK on its platform, while Bithumb reported removing the token from its watch list.

According to Upbit's statement, the cryptocurrency $BONK will be delisted from the exchange on September 7 at 09:00. Following this decision, users will need to follow procedures related to $BONK transactions and asset transfers. Delisting means the removal of trading pairs for this cryptocurrency from the platform, and users will no longer be able to trade this asset.

South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges regularly evaluate the digital assets they list based on certain criteria. Factors such as trading volume, liquidity, project activity, investor protection, technical developments, and market conditions can influence decisions on listing or delisting assets.

On the other hand, Bithumb has taken a more positive step regarding $BONK, in contrast to Upbit. The exchange announced the removal of $BONK from its list of companies under watch. This marks a step toward ending the previously existing trading warning for $BONK on Bithumb.

The fact that two major South Korean exchanges made different decisions regarding the same asset indicates that cryptocurrency projects are evaluated individually by exchanges. One exchange's decision to delist does not automatically mean the token will be removed from other platforms.

$BONK, as one of the leading memecoins in the Solana ecosystem, particularly attracts attention from retail investors. Since memecoins tend to exhibit high price volatility, decisions to list or delist on major exchanges can significantly impact the token's price and trading volume.

As Upbit's delisting decision on September 7 approaches, market participants are expected to closely monitor the trading status of $BONK on other South Korean exchanges and any potential new announcements. Bithumb's decision to remove $BONK from its watch list indicates that current support for trading the token on this platform remains.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat decision did Upbit announce regarding the memecoin $BONK?

AUpbit announced that it will delist the cryptocurrency $BONK from its exchange on September 7th at 09:00.

QHow did Bithumb's decision regarding $BONK differ from Upbit's?

ABithumb announced the removal of $BONK from its watchlist, which is a step towards ending the trading warning previously placed on the token, thus maintaining current trading support, unlike Upbit's delisting.

QWhat are some factors that South Korean crypto exchanges consider when evaluating digital assets for listing?

ASouth Korean crypto exchanges evaluate digital assets based on criteria such as trading volume, liquidity, project activity, investor protection, technical development, and market conditions.

QWhat does the differing decisions from Upbit and Bithumb on $BONK indicate about how exchanges evaluate projects?

AThe differing decisions indicate that cryptocurrency projects are evaluated individually by each exchange, and one exchange's delisting decision does not automatically mean the token will be removed from other platforms.

QWhen is the deadline for $BONK transactions on Upbit following its delisting announcement?

AAccording to the article, Upbit will delist $BONK on September 7th at 09:00. After this, users will need to follow procedures related to $BONK transactions and asset transfers.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Fast Partners with Rhuna to Power instant payments for UNTOLD

On August 7, 2026, Fast (a payments network by Pi2 Labs) and Rhuna (a live events platform) announced a partnership to provide instant payment settlement for major festivals, starting with UNTOLD. This integration deploys Fast's infrastructure, originally engineered for high-volume, real-time AI agent transactions, to handle the intense payment peaks of festival environments. Rhuna's platform manages consumer-facing wallets and vendor payments at events, while Fast processes the underlying settlements instantly and in parallel, eliminating batching delays. This pilot is a real-world test for Fast's architecture, designed for billions of transactions with verifiable finality. As Rhuna expands globally, the volume on Fast's network will grow, serving as a proving ground for its application in fintech, marketplaces, and the future agentic economy.

cointelegraphHace 54 min(s)

Fast Partners with Rhuna to Power instant payments for UNTOLD

cointelegraphHace 54 min(s)

Mining Firms Flock to AI, but Wall Street Cools Valuation Enthusiasm. The Earnings Season Reveals Who's 'Swimming Naked'?

Bitcoin mining companies are increasingly pivoting to AI and HPC (high-performance computing) infrastructure, but Wall Street is growing skeptical, demanding proof of a viable business model over mere announcements. An analysis shows that while early AI-related announcements triggered significant stock price movements (average absolute change of 24.1%), recent similar news has had a much smaller market impact (average ~10.2%), despite the underlying business value of AI/HPC hosting contracts improving. A review of Q2 2024 earnings from five major mining firms reveals a mixed picture: * **Marathon Digital (MARA):** Reported declining revenue ($175M, down 27%) and a large net loss ($610M+). Its AI/HPC transformation remains in the building phase, contributing negligible revenue so far. * **Core Scientific:** Successfully shifted its business model, with AI/HPC hosting now dominating revenue (83% of total $164.2M). However, this came with high capital expenditure and negative shareholder equity. * **TeraWulf:** Showed early results from its pivot, with HPC leasing generating 71% of its total revenue ($44.77M). It secured major long-term contracts but also reported a significant net loss. * **Hut 8:** Achieved substantial revenue growth ($74.9M, up 81.4%) driven by computing operations and completed commercialization of its first major AI data center campus. It remains unprofitable on a net income basis. * **CleanSpark:** Revenue still relies entirely on Bitcoin mining ($138M, down 30.5%). Its main AI highlight was signing a $6.6 billion, 20-year data center lease, but revenue from it is not expected until late 2027. The key takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from the "AI story" to tangible execution, project delivery capabilities, customer quality, and the ability to generate future cash flow.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Mining Firms Flock to AI, but Wall Street Cools Valuation Enthusiasm. The Earnings Season Reveals Who's 'Swimming Naked'?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

All Metrics Smashing Records, Yet Stock Prices Plunge Across the Board

Memory giants like Western Digital (WDC) and SanDisk (SNDK) reported blockbuster earnings in the summer of 2026, featuring毛利率 exceeding 80%, massive customer prepayments, and long-term supply agreements. Despite this seemingly perfect performance, their stocks plummeted post-earnings (WDC down 13%, SNDK down 7%), along with peers like Micron. The collapse highlights a core market rule: "good" isn't enough; results must beat already sky-high expectations. With valuations at peak "perfect asset" levels, even slightly conservative forward guidance triggered a sell-off. The market saw "peak performance" as a signal to exit. Beneath the stellar numbers, four反常 trends emerged: 1. **Financialized Pricing:** Customers provide百亿级 in upfront "interest-free deposits" to secure future capacity. 2. **Reversed Cost Curve:** Advanced DRAM (HBM4, DDR6) costs are rising per bit due to complex packaging, breaking Moore's Law. 3. **AI vs. Consumer Split:** Data center storage demand soars (+103% for SanDisk), while consumer electronics demand weakens under high costs. 4. **HDD Revival:** Hard drives, now used for AI agent context caching, see毛利率 near 55-57%. Underlying隐忧 persist. Soaring capital expenditure (CapEx) by SK Hynix and Micron risks future oversupply. Revenue growth is increasingly driven by price hikes, not surging shipment volumes (bit growth), making profits vulnerable to any price correction. In conclusion, while AI has created a long-term growth narrative, transforming storage into "strategic infrastructure," the market's violent reaction signals that peak valuations and expectations have left no safety margin. The周期 hasn't disappeared; it's merely wearing an AI disguise.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

All Metrics Smashing Records, Yet Stock Prices Plunge Across the Board

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Building the Next-Generation Financial Information Terminal with BlockBeats

BlockBeats is building a next-generation personal financial information portal, integrating real-time global market data, news, professional research, and AI-powered analysis. We are actively hiring for multiple roles across our teams in Beijing, with strictly remote opportunities available. We are seeking passionate individuals to join our Hot News Team as Global Market Information Editors, responsible for real-time tracking and analysis of global tech, financial markets, and industry trends. Our In-Depth Reporting & Research Team is looking for Tech Finance Researchers to conduct deep analysis on AI, capital markets, digital assets, and emerging industries. Our Operations Team needs Social Media Specialists to drive user growth and community engagement on platforms like Twitter and Telegram. The Business Team has openings for Business Executives to manage client partnerships and Overseas Business Development specialists to expand our global footprint. Technical roles include Frontend and Backend Developers to help build our products. We are also forming a Prediction Markets Team, seeking Researchers/Content Writers to analyze market events, on-chain data, and provide actionable insights. Ideal candidates are curious about future tech, sensitive to financial markets, adept at extracting value from information, and eager to build new products. Both full-time positions and internships are available.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Building the Next-Generation Financial Information Terminal with BlockBeats

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

One of the first major Bitcoin buyers who purchased it at $15 has become active again after 10 months!

A significant early Bitcoin investor, who originally bought BTC when it was priced between $10 and $15, has become active again after approximately 10 months of dormancy. According to on-chain analytics platform Onchain Lens, this large holder, often referred to as a "whale," transferred 50 BTC (worth roughly $3.22 million) to a new wallet address. Market observers speculate this transfer could be preparatory for an over-the-counter (OTC) sale. The analysis points out that this investor has a history of moving assets to new addresses before sending portions to institutional crypto services like FalconX or centralized exchanges. OTC trades are commonly used by large players to execute substantial transactions without causing significant price slippage on the open market. However, experts caution against definitive conclusions, noting that such wallet movements can also be related to security upgrades, changes in custody strategy, or simple wallet consolidation, and do not necessarily indicate an impending sale.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

One of the first major Bitcoin buyers who purchased it at $15 has become active again after 10 months!

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot