India’s Crypto Policy Under Scrutiny as Chadha Pushes for VDA Legal Recognition

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

Indian AAP MP Raghav Chadha urged the Indian government to legally recognize Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) as a formal asset class during a Rajya Sabha address. He highlighted the inconsistency in the current approach where crypto profits are taxed—1% TDS and 30% flat tax—yet lack legal status. This ambiguity has eroded investor confidence, driven an estimated 12 crore Indian investors to offshore platforms, and caused 180 VDA startups to relocate abroad. Chadha noted that 73% of crypto trading volume has moved offshore in FY25, resulting in significant tax revenue loss. He proposed a new licensing law to enhance consumer protection, enforce AML measures, and potentially recover ₹15,000–20,000 crores in annual tax revenue through clear regulation.

AAP MP Raghav Chadha addressed the Rajya Sabha, urging the Indian government to legalise Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class. He noted that the government has already started taxing digital assets but has failed to accord them the requisite legal classification. Chadha noted that the tax structure requires investors to pay 1% as TDS and a 30% flat tax on their crypto profits without legal status. Chadha noted that the government needs to move beyond the half-baked system of asset classification.

The MP argued that such an inconsistency erodes investor confidence in digital assets. Chadha said 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms due to unclear laws. He added that 180 VDA startups have relocated operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad. The MP emphasised that India loses significant tax revenues under the current regulatory trend.

Offshore Trading and Regulatory Challenges

Chadha pointed out that 73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025. This trend will continue and likely worsen unless authorities implement clear regulations. According to the MP, the current regulatory space is risky and does not encourage investors. The MP noted that other countries, such as Dubai, Singapore, and Malaysia, have attracted Indian investors due to clear regulatory mechanisms. These countries have clear legal frameworks that classify the services of crypto assets.

Chadha pointed out that the lack of a licensing law for India holds the key to comprehensive consumer protection and AML. He said that the ring-fencing approach could lower the risks of money laundering and enhance compliance. Chadha added that the digital trading assets, if brought onboard, could strengthen the domestic market.

Proposed Legislative Framework

Mr Chadha also proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers. The law should place investor protection at the center of its mandates and enforce stringent AML measures to bring the grey market into compliance. It will also help India to garner tax revenues of Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 crores annually as clarity is created.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Tags#Indiacrypto tax indiaIndiaIndia CryptocurrencyIndian_Government

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument made by AAP MP Raghav Chadha regarding India's crypto policy?

ARaghav Chadha argues that India should legalize Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class, as the current system taxes crypto (1% TDS and 30% flat tax on profits) without providing legal status, which he calls a 'half-baked system'.

QAccording to the article, what are two major consequences of India's unclear crypto regulations?

ATwo major consequences are: 1) 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms, and 2) 180 VDA startups have relocated their operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad.

QWhat percentage of crypto trading volume has left India for offshore platforms in FY25, as cited by Chadha?

A73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025.

QWhat key legislative measure did Chadha propose to address the regulatory challenges?

AChadha proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers, which would place investor protection at its center and enforce stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures.

QWhich countries were mentioned as having attracted Indian crypto investors due to their clear regulatory frameworks?

ADubai, Singapore, and Malaysia were mentioned as countries that have attracted Indian investors due to their clear regulatory mechanisms and legal frameworks for crypto assets.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片