In the Internet Shutdown Winter, Iranians Rely on Decentralized Technology to Connect with the World

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-02Actualizado a 2026-02-02

Resumen

Since early January, Iran has experienced severe nationwide internet blackouts amid violent protests triggered by the collapse of the national currency, the rial. Citizens like Darius, using pseudonyms for safety, have turned to decentralized tools such as dVPNs, OpenVPN, Shadowsocks, and V2Ray to bypass government censorship during brief connectivity windows. These tools disguise internet traffic to evade detection, allowing limited communication via platforms like Telegram. The Iranian government imposed the blackout to suppress protests and control information flow, following economic turmoil and public unrest. Experts note that decentralized networks and satellite systems like Starlink provide critical, resilient access, though complete shutdowns remain challenging to circumvent. The blackout has inflicted significant economic damage and hindered accurate reporting of casualties, with estimates of protest-related fatalities ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands. Despite these efforts, sustained resistance faces major obstacles without external support, as Iran’s heavily funded security apparatus maintains tight control. Decentralized technology remains a vital, though imperfect, lifeline for Iranians seeking to share information and connect with the outside world.

Written by: Liam Kelly

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Since early January, Iran has been experiencing a large-scale internet shutdown, but some resourceful individuals have begun using decentralized technology to connect with the outside world.

During a brief window of internet connectivity amid the severe internet blockade in Iran this month, Darius managed to send a short message via Telegram.

"They are afraid of the videos protesters upload online, so they turned off all the street lights," he shared on January 14 with the Persian-language community Sentinel, of which he is a long-term member.

"People have to walk using their phone flashlights; everything is terrible. They have even broken North Korea's record in censorship."

This was about a week after the collapse of the Iranian rial (Iran's currency) sparked violent protests.

Since then, Darius has been switching between various network routing tools, including Sentinel's decentralized virtual private network (dVPN), to continue bypassing the government's strict communication blockade.

The tools he relies on include:

OpenVPN: A widely used tool that hides users' IP addresses;

Shadowsocks: Based on the SOCKS5 protocol, it disguises network traffic as random data;

V2Ray: Uses the security certificates of legitimate websites to conceal users' real identities.

In information exclusively provided to DL News, he described life under a violent regime with near-total internet disconnection.

"We are living in hell, with no internet, no money, no media, no support whatsoever," wrote Darius on January 14, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. "We need help; people cannot resist with bare hands—they shoot us with shotguns and AK-47s."

Digital Iron Curtain

In response to the ongoing protests that began last December and have spread to multiple areas beyond the capital Tehran, the Iranian government implemented the most severe communication shutdown in the regime's nearly 50-year history on January 8.

Adam Burns, co-founder of the Australian Internet Association, stated that the Iranian government's move has a dual purpose.

"This is a standard communication control measure, aimed at organizationally stifling protest activities and preventing international exposure," he told DL News. "Essentially, it's a form of risk management."

During this period, decentralized networks and traffic obfuscation tools became critical lifelines for the people.

Reports indicate that since last August, up to 90% of Iranians have used some form of circumvention tool to connect to the outside world.

Such networks are typically more resilient than centralized networks, which have a single database or point of failure. To destroy a decentralized network, the government must shut down every self-hosted node one by one or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

Other tools, such as Starlink, the distributed satellite network operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX, have also become vital communication channels for the people. Since systems like Starlink lack a single local node, their distributed infrastructure can provide critical network connectivity even under intense censorship.

However, reports note that such large-scale internet restrictions cost the country billions of dollars in economic losses.

"By providing decentralized, highly resilient network access to resist even the most aggressive censorship, we help keep information flowing, allowing the brave people inside Iran to document and share the violence concealed by the internet shutdown," Sentinel CEO Aleksandr Litreev told DL News.

Of course, in a complete internet blackout, almost no network can function.

However, during the shutdown, people like Darius can seize brief windows of connectivity, as the regime needs to balance silencing criticism with maintaining economic operations.

"It's a cyclical cat-and-mouse game," Burns said.

Using his combination of tools, Darius disguises his network requests as ordinary traffic, directing them to large Iranian e-commerce websites that the government keeps online for economic purposes. This encrypted data is then tunneled to overseas servers that can access the external internet.

This is not foolproof, nor is it sustainable, but it allows Darius to send a few Telegram messages during brief connectivity windows.

"Once the traffic pattern is exposed as an unauthenticated connection, it is immediately cut off," Darius wrote on January 23.

Chaos in Iran

Over the past four weeks, Iran has descended into total chaos.

On December 28, people gathered in Tehran's Grand Bazaar to protest the government's handling of the currency collapse. By the end of 2025, the Iranian rial had hit a historic low, with 1 US dollar exchanging for 1.4 million rials, partly due to severe international sanctions and financial mismanagement by Iran's leadership. The US imposed sanctions on Iran to prevent its nuclear weapons program and stop its support for terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis.

"It's like holding a shitcoin listed only on isolated exchanges, its price falling every day, until you have to use this worthless currency to buy basic necessities like milk and meat," Darius wrote. "Worse, the next day, the same items cost even more."

Iran is a theocracy, with the vast majority of power held by the Supreme Leader, cleric Ali Khamenei. Although Iran has an elected president and parliament, their power is limited. The people have long criticized the regime, and the rial's collapse has completely changed the situation.

"Generally, people don't revolt for lofty ideals like democracy or universal suffrage; they rebel over things that affect their daily lives," Tallha Abdulrazaq, a researcher at the University of Exeter's Institute for Strategy and Security, told DL News. "As long as basic needs are met and there is hope for the future, people are more willing to live under authoritarian rule."

After the internet shutdown on January 8, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij militia began clearing protestors with live ammunition.

Due to the internet blackout, it has been difficult for people on the ground and multiple human rights organizations to verify the death toll. The Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths; London-based Persian-language news channel Iran International, citing internal documents from the Supreme National Security Council and the Presidential Office, reported at least 12,000 deaths. Two senior officials from Iran's Health Ministry told Time magazine that as many as 30,000 may have been killed between January 8 and 9.

As for overthrowing the regime, Abdulrazaq believes it is almost impossible without international intervention. "The Iranian government may not have invested in public services, but it has invested heavily in security agencies. Therefore, without external support, I don't see how these protests can overthrow the Iranian regime," he said.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat decentralized technologies are Iranians using to connect to the outside world during the internet blackout?

AIranians are using decentralized technologies such as Sentinel's dVPN, OpenVPN to hide IP addresses, Shadowsocks to disguise network traffic as random data, and V2Ray to mask user identities using legitimate website security certificates.

QWhy did the Iranian government impose such a severe internet blackout in January?

AThe Iranian government imposed the internet blackout to prevent the organization of protests and to stop international exposure of the violent crackdowns on demonstrators, following protests triggered by the collapse of the Iranian rial and economic mismanagement.

QHow do decentralized networks provide resilience against government censorship compared to centralized networks?

ADecentralized networks are more resilient because they lack a single point of failure or central database. To shut them down, the government would need to disable each self-hosted node individually or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

QWhat economic and social conditions led to the protests in Iran?

AThe protests were sparked by the collapse of the Iranian rial, which hit a record low of 1.4 million rials to the US dollar due to international sanctions and financial mismanagement. This led to severe inflation, making basic goods unaffordable and exacerbating public dissatisfaction with the regime.

QWhat are the reported casualty figures during the internet blackout and crackdown, and why is there difficulty in verifying them?

AReports vary widely: the Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths, Iran International cited internal documents suggesting at least 12,000 deaths, and Iranian Health Ministry officials told Time that up to 30,000 may have been killed. Verification is difficult due to the internet blackout, which prevents information from being shared and documented effectively.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight NewsHace 26 min(s)

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight NewsHace 26 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片