If MSCI Removes MSTR, Will the Stock Price Actually Fall? Historical Backtesting Reveals a Surprising Answer

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-15Actualizado a 2025-12-15

Resumen

The article examines whether MSCI's potential removal of MicroStrategy (MSTR) from its index would actually cause a significant drop in its share price, based on historical backtesting. MSCI index changes can trigger forced selling by passive funds, reducing liquidity and investor confidence. However, historical data from the November 2025 MSCI rebalancing shows that most of the price decline for removed stocks occurred during the pre-announcement anticipation phase (average drop of 24.5%), not after the official announcement (average drop of only 0.7%) or on the effective date. Some stocks even rebounded after removal. MSTR has already fallen 51% from its October high, suggesting the market may have already priced in the risk of removal. Additionally, Nasdaq 100's recent decision to retain MSTR indicates strong fundamentals and liquidity. The core driver of MSTR’s price remains Bitcoin’s performance. If MSCI retains MSTR on January 15, it could be a positive surprise. The current setup may present an asymmetric risk-reward opportunity for MSTR.

The discussion about whether MSCI should remove MicroStrategy from its index has become a Sword of Damocles hanging over the company.

The market seems to be waiting for the official announcement on January 15th to deliver the final verdict on $MSTR.

How influential is MSCI really? If removed, will MicroStrategy's stock actually fall? I backtested historical data, and the answer is surprising.

Let's state the conclusion first: even if MSCI removes MSTR, it's highly likely that MSTR won't experience a significant drop because of it.

I. Why We Care About MSCI

First, we need to understand why MSCI's decision is so important.

The MSCI index is not just a simple list of stocks; it's the benchmark for trillions of dollars in global asset allocation.

1⃣ Forced Buying and Selling by Passive Funds:

Globally, trillions of dollars in ETFs (like iShares, Vanguard) and index funds strictly track the MSCI USA Index.

Once MSCI announces the removal of a stock, these funds must unconditionally sell that stock on the effective date (usually at the market close on the last day of the month), regardless of cost.

2⃣ A Double Blow to Liquidity and Attention:

Removal typically means the company is kicked out of the "core asset" club. Many actively managed funds, constrained by risk control rules (e.g., only allowed to invest in major index constituents), are also forced to follow suit and reduce their positions. This leads to decreased stock liquidity and a lower valuation benchmark.

II. Echoes from History: The Big Drop Often Happens *Before* the Announcement

However, based on my backtest of data from the last MSCI index review, the decline often doesn't begin on the day of the index adjustment.

The rule in financial markets is: the price always moves ahead of the news.

The most recent MSCI index adjustment occurred this November, removing companies like Whirlpool, Sensata, and ZoomInfo.

The timeline for an MSCI index adjustment is as follows:

November 5th: Announcement of the changes

November 25th: Changes become effective

Through calculation, I found that the maximum decline for the removed stocks did not occur *after* the removal took effect, but rather during the anticipation phase *before* the announcement.

The data is shown in the chart below

Phase 1 (Panic Brewing Period, 100 days before announcement):

During this period, stocks that were eventually removed fell by an average of 24.5%. The market anticipated the removal outcome in advance through deteriorating fundamentals and shrinking market capitalization.

Smart money had already front-run the move.

Phase 2 (Bad News Realization Period, Announcement day to Effective day):

When MSCI officially announced the removal list, stock performance was反而 stable, with an average decline of only 0.7%.甚至, individual stocks like Whirlpool (WHR)反而 saw a 2.1% rebound after the announcement.

Phase 3 (Post-Effect Recovery Period):

After the official removal took effect, some oversold individual stocks (like Sensata) even recorded gains of nearly 10%.

Overall, the average decline was 24.5% *before* the announcement, and 0.7% *after* the announcement.

Back to our protagonist 【MSTR】

MSCI announced in October that it was considering removing stocks of MSTR's type from the index.

And MSTR's stock price has fallen 51% from its October high, far exceeding the decline in BTC over the same period.

Just like other companies removed from the MSCI index, the market has already started front-running the passive funds *before* MSCI's decision.

III. The Signal from the Nasdaq 100

When analyzing whether MicroStrategy will truly be removed by MSCI,

we cannot ignore a key leading indicator: the Nasdaq 100 index.

Although the Nasdaq 100 and MSCI USA indices have different construction rules, their core logic is highly overlapping: both place extreme importance on market capitalization and liquidity.

This past Friday, the Nasdaq 100 index announced it would retain MicroStrategy's constituent status.

This means that, from an index compilation perspective, MicroStrategy's average daily trading volume and free-float market capitalization still meet the stringent standards for being among the top 100 largest non-financial technology companies in the US.

Since MicroStrategy managed to hold its ground in the Nasdaq 100, it indicates that its fundamentals and liquidity have not deteriorated to an irreparable point.

Although MSCI has its own qualitative industry classification considerations, in terms of hard metrics, MicroStrategy still possesses strong competitiveness.

Conclusion

MSCI potentially removing MSTR from its index is definitely a significant negative.

But negatives are often提前 priced in by the market. According to historical backtesting, the impact on the stock price after the negative news materializes is反而 not significant.

The core variable真正 affecting MSTR's direction right now is still the trend of BTC.

甚至, because MSCI's potential removal of MSTR is still only in the discussion phase, if the announcement on January 15th next year ends up retaining MSTR's constituent status, that would be a major positive. Retention = big rise! Removal = small fall. I believe MSTR presents an opportunity for asymmetric returns in the period ahead.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main conclusion of the article regarding MSTR's stock price if it is removed from the MSCI index?

AThe main conclusion is that even if MSCI removes MSTR from its index, MSTR's stock price is unlikely to fall significantly, as the negative impact has likely already been priced in by the market.

QAccording to the historical backtest, when did the largest average price drop occur for stocks removed from the MSCI index?

AThe largest average price drop of 24.5% occurred during the 'panic fermentation phase,' which is the 100 days before the official announcement of the removal.

QWhat is the significance of the Nasdaq 100 index's recent decision regarding MSTR?

AThe Nasdaq 100 index's decision to retain MSTR as a component is a key leading indicator, suggesting that MSTR's average trading volume and free-float market cap still meet the stringent standards for a top-100 non-financial tech company, which could influence MSCI's decision.

QWhat does the article identify as the core variable that will truly influence MSTR's future price movement?

AThe article identifies the price movement of Bitcoin (BTC) as the core variable that will truly influence MSTR's future price direction.

QWhat potential asymmetric opportunity does the article suggest exists for MSTR?

AThe article suggests an asymmetric opportunity exists because if MSCI announces on January 15th that it will retain MSTR, it would be a major positive catalyst causing the stock to rise significantly, whereas a removal is expected to have only a minor negative impact, creating a favorable risk-reward scenario.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight NewsHace 2 hora(s)

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight NewsHace 2 hora(s)

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

Goldman Sachs analyzes China's AI large language model (LLM) landscape, identifying key players and a strategic shift towards efficiency and global expansion. The report highlights that Chinese open-source/open-weight models are closing the performance gap with top global proprietary models at significantly lower cost, driven by architectural innovations like MoE. This enables a "two-tier" market: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with pricing at ~$1 per million tokens, and a low-end, price-sensitive global segment. Open-source strategies aid adoption but limit monetization, as deployments via third-party platforms (e.g., AWS Bedrock, Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue for model creators. The industry is thus moving towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing to improve unit economics. Internationally, the focus is shifting from "token maximization" to ROI-driven enterprise adoption, particularly in non-U.S. markets. Major cloud platforms are integrating Chinese models (e.g., DeepSeek, MiniMax). Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman Sachs identifies **Zhipu AI** and **DeepSeek** as leaders in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** (with Seedance) leading in multimodal/video generation. **MiniMax** and **Kuaishou** are also rated favorably. The firm forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue growing from ~RMB 35bn (2026E) to RMB 879bn by 2030.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar O

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar O1 exchange (O) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu O1 exchange (O)Después de comprar tu O1 exchange (O), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear O1 exchange (O)Tradear fácilmente con O1 exchange (O) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

83 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.19Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Cómo comprar O

Cómo comprar PROS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Pharos (PROS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Pharos (PROS)Después de comprar tu Pharos (PROS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Pharos (PROS)Tradear fácilmente con Pharos (PROS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

102 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Cómo comprar PROS

Qué es VERONA

I. Introducción al Proyecto VERONA es una blockchain construida para todos, en todas partes a través de la abstracción de cadenas. Utilizando su capa de Abstracción Generalizada, VERONA se distingue por integrar funcionalidades complejas de blockchain, como cuentas, firmas e interoperabilidad, directamente a nivel de protocolo. Este enfoque permite interactuar con aplicaciones de blockchain sin necesidad de entender las tecnologías subyacentes.1) Información Básica Nombre: VERONA (VERONA)III. Enlaces Relacionados Enlace al sitio web oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Libro Blanco: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Redes Sociales: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: La introducción del proyecto proviene de los materiales publicados o proporcionados por el equipo oficial del proyecto, que es solo para referencia y no constituye asesoramiento de inversión. HTX no se hace responsable de ninguna pérdida directa o indirecta resultante.

115 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.22

Qué es VERONA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de A (A).

活动图片