Hyperliquid’s market share surges to 33% – Can HYPE target $36 next?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-31Actualizado a 2026-01-31

Resumen

Hyperliquid's market share surged from 18% in December to 33% by the end of January, driven by the introduction and success of its equity and commodity perpetuals (perps). Non-crypto assets, such as silver and gold, now account for 30% of the platform's trading volume, positioning it as a key cross-asset trading platform. This growth has positively impacted the native token HYPE, with increased trading volume generating higher fees, which fuel token buybacks and burns. Weekly revenue rose from $11 million to $15.5 million, and HYPE's price increased by 70%. Maintaining support above $28 could lead to a breakout toward $36, while a drop below may push it back to the $20-$28 range.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] has regained a portion of the market share it lost in 2025 following heated competition from Aster [ASTER], Lighter [LIT], and other rivals.

According to Dune data, the platform’s market dominance rose from a recent low of 18% seen in December to over 33% at the end of January.

That’s a 15% jump in market share, thanks to booming equity perpetuals (perps) that have positioned it as a key cross-asset platform.

How equity perps fueled Hyperliquid’s growth

Hyperliquid was initially focused on crypto perps or derivatives that allow traders to speculate on prices with leverage.

They are called perpetuals because they don’t expire with strict deadlines like Options, so one can hold them indefinitely, provided they pay fees to keep the positions open.

The platform unveiled a similar offering for equity and commodities via an upgrade, HIP-3, enabled by third-party integrations.

Interestingly, the recently volatile precious metals market has cemented Hyperliquid as a crucial cross-asset trading platform.

On Friday, silver and gold ranked among the top five assets by trading volume on Hyperliquid. Silver traded $3 billion in volume, while gold closed at nearly $700 million. The other top assets were Bitcoin, Ethereum, and HYPE, while Solana [SOL] ranked sixth.

According to crypto VC partner and trader McKenna, 30% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volume is driven by non-crypto assets. He added,

“Let me repeat, Hyperliquid will bring in more daily volume from TradFi perpetuals than digital asset perpetuals.”

Impact of the equity perps boom on HYPE

The equity perps boom was expected to be net positive for the native token, HYPE.

It is a bullish catalyst because the higher the equity perps’ trading volume climbs, the more fees are generated, which drives HYPE buybacks and burns.

In fact, DeFiLlama data showed the positive correlation between the recent rebound in generated revenue, perps volume, and HYPE price.

The average weekly revenue has increased from $11 million to $15.5 million, and the HYPE price has mooned by 70% over the same period.

On the price charts, the altcoin had given back some of the gains amid bearish pressure on Bitcoin. But defending $28 zone as support could reinforce a potential breakout above $36 if the equity perps’ traction extends.

However, breaking below $28 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Final Thoughts

Hyperliquid’s market share has increased from 18% to 33% amid equity and commodity perps trading surge
Non-crypto assets now account for 32% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volumes

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Hyperliquid's market share at the end of January, and what was this a significant increase from?

AHyperliquid's market share rose to over 33% at the end of January, which was a significant increase from a recent low of 18% seen in December.

QWhat new type of perpetuals, introduced via HIP-3, was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth?

AThe introduction of equity and commodities perpetuals (perps) via the HIP-3 upgrade was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth.

QAccording to the data, what percentage of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets?

AAccording to the data, 30% of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets.

QHow does the increase in trading volume from equity perps directly benefit the native token, HYPE?

AThe increase in trading volume generates more fees, which are used to drive HYPE token buybacks and burns, making it a bullish catalyst for the token's price.

QWhat is the critical price level for HYPE that, if broken, would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap it in its December price range?

AThe critical price level is $28. Breaking below this support would invalidate the bullish outlook and could trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报Hace 6 min(s)

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报Hace 6 min(s)

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot