Hyperliquid’s market share surges to 33% – Can HYPE target $36 next?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-31Actualizado a 2026-01-31

Resumen

Hyperliquid's market share surged from 18% in December to 33% by the end of January, driven by the introduction and success of its equity and commodity perpetuals (perps). Non-crypto assets, such as silver and gold, now account for 30% of the platform's trading volume, positioning it as a key cross-asset trading platform. This growth has positively impacted the native token HYPE, with increased trading volume generating higher fees, which fuel token buybacks and burns. Weekly revenue rose from $11 million to $15.5 million, and HYPE's price increased by 70%. Maintaining support above $28 could lead to a breakout toward $36, while a drop below may push it back to the $20-$28 range.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] has regained a portion of the market share it lost in 2025 following heated competition from Aster [ASTER], Lighter [LIT], and other rivals.

According to Dune data, the platform’s market dominance rose from a recent low of 18% seen in December to over 33% at the end of January.

That’s a 15% jump in market share, thanks to booming equity perpetuals (perps) that have positioned it as a key cross-asset platform.

How equity perps fueled Hyperliquid’s growth

Hyperliquid was initially focused on crypto perps or derivatives that allow traders to speculate on prices with leverage.

They are called perpetuals because they don’t expire with strict deadlines like Options, so one can hold them indefinitely, provided they pay fees to keep the positions open.

The platform unveiled a similar offering for equity and commodities via an upgrade, HIP-3, enabled by third-party integrations.

Interestingly, the recently volatile precious metals market has cemented Hyperliquid as a crucial cross-asset trading platform.

On Friday, silver and gold ranked among the top five assets by trading volume on Hyperliquid. Silver traded $3 billion in volume, while gold closed at nearly $700 million. The other top assets were Bitcoin, Ethereum, and HYPE, while Solana [SOL] ranked sixth.

According to crypto VC partner and trader McKenna, 30% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volume is driven by non-crypto assets. He added,

“Let me repeat, Hyperliquid will bring in more daily volume from TradFi perpetuals than digital asset perpetuals.”

Impact of the equity perps boom on HYPE

The equity perps boom was expected to be net positive for the native token, HYPE.

It is a bullish catalyst because the higher the equity perps’ trading volume climbs, the more fees are generated, which drives HYPE buybacks and burns.

In fact, DeFiLlama data showed the positive correlation between the recent rebound in generated revenue, perps volume, and HYPE price.

The average weekly revenue has increased from $11 million to $15.5 million, and the HYPE price has mooned by 70% over the same period.

On the price charts, the altcoin had given back some of the gains amid bearish pressure on Bitcoin. But defending $28 zone as support could reinforce a potential breakout above $36 if the equity perps’ traction extends.

However, breaking below $28 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Final Thoughts

Hyperliquid’s market share has increased from 18% to 33% amid equity and commodity perps trading surge
Non-crypto assets now account for 32% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volumes

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Hyperliquid's market share at the end of January, and what was this a significant increase from?

AHyperliquid's market share rose to over 33% at the end of January, which was a significant increase from a recent low of 18% seen in December.

QWhat new type of perpetuals, introduced via HIP-3, was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth?

AThe introduction of equity and commodities perpetuals (perps) via the HIP-3 upgrade was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth.

QAccording to the data, what percentage of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets?

AAccording to the data, 30% of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets.

QHow does the increase in trading volume from equity perps directly benefit the native token, HYPE?

AThe increase in trading volume generates more fees, which are used to drive HYPE token buybacks and burns, making it a bullish catalyst for the token's price.

QWhat is the critical price level for HYPE that, if broken, would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap it in its December price range?

AThe critical price level is $28. Breaking below this support would invalidate the bullish outlook and could trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Chip Stocks Hit Record Highs Since 2000, SaaS Stocks Fall to Yearly Lows: Two Worlds Under the AI Divide

The article highlights a stark divergence in the tech market driven by AI: semiconductor stocks are surging while SaaS stocks plummet. On April 23, Texas Instruments saw its best single-day performance since 2000, with Q1 revenue up 19% and data center revenue surging 90%. Intel also reported blowout results, with revenue far exceeding expectations and its stock rising over 20% after hours. The semiconductor ETF (SMH) is up nearly 28% this year. In contrast, SaaS companies like ServiceNow and IBM experienced historic declines, with ServiceNow dropping 18% despite beating earnings estimates. The software ETF (IGV) has entered a technical bear market, losing about $2 trillion in market cap. The trend, dubbed "SaaSpocalypse," reflects fears that AI agents could reduce the need for software licenses and enable companies to build internal tools instead of relying on SaaS subscriptions. The market is rotating capital from software to semiconductors, betting on AI infrastructure as a safer play. Chip stocks now trade at high valuations—Texas Instruments at a P/E over 50, Intel at 120 times forward earnings—pricing in years of growth. However, this depends on continued massive AI capital expenditure from tech giants. If spending slows, the trend could reverse. For now, the divide persists: chips celebrate, SaaS struggles.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Chip Stocks Hit Record Highs Since 2000, SaaS Stocks Fall to Yearly Lows: Two Worlds Under the AI Divide

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

From Robinhood to Polymarket: The Era of All-in-One Asset Platforms Is Coming Asset classes are rapidly converging. Platforms that once specialized in single categories—such as stocks, cryptocurrencies, or prediction markets—are now moving toward offering all three. Robinhood pioneered this model, starting with equities, adding crypto in 2018, and prediction markets in 2025. This strategy has proven resilient: when crypto revenues fell, other segments like options and stocks filled the gap. Now, prediction market leaders Polymarket and Kalshi are moving in the same direction, both announcing perpetual futures trading on April 21, 2026, pending regulatory approval. These futures will cover assets like Bitcoin, gold, and stocks such as Nvidia. This trend mirrors the consolidation seen in consumer tech, like smartphones replacing dedicated cameras and MP3 players. Younger users, accustomed to interacting with multiple asset types from an early age, will increasingly demand unified platforms. A key competitive advantage in prediction markets is collateral utilization—idle assets locked during betting periods. Polymarket’s move into perpetuals may be a strategy to generate yield from that capital, similar to earlier DeFi integrations like PolyAave. As the regulatory landscape evolves, traditional finance is also likely to incorporate crypto and prediction markets, further accelerating this convergence.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Sam Bankman-Fried Backs Off New Trial Request, Keeps Pressure On Judge Removal

Sam Bankman-Fried has withdrawn his request for a new trial, stating he does not expect a fair hearing from Judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversees his criminal case. He withdrew the motion without prejudice, meaning he can refile it after his appeal and a separate request to remove Kaplan from the case are resolved. Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud related to the collapse of FTX. The withdrawal followed a court-ordered inquiry into whether he had legal help drafting an earlier filing, which he denied. His efforts to replace the judge and appeal his conviction continue. Outside court, he has sought a pardon, but former President Trump has indicated he will not grant one.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Sam Bankman-Fried Backs Off New Trial Request, Keeps Pressure On Judge Removal

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros