Hyperliquid founder blocks market makers to keep the DEX ‘credibly neutral’

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-02Actualizado a 2026-01-02

Resumen

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has positioned the DEX as a "credibly neutral" platform, emphasizing integrity and fairness by blocking market makers, private investors, and protocol fees. This stance contrasts with recent controversy around Lighter DEX, which faced criticism for undisclosed market-making deals, including airdrops to entities like Jump Trading and Kelsier Labs. While Hyperliquid's market share has dropped from 75% to 19% amid rising competition, its token HYPE saw a slight price increase following Yan's remarks. The ongoing "perpetual DEX wars highlight tensions between transparency and traditional market-making practices in decentralized exchanges.

The perpetual DEX wars aren’t slowing down anytime soon.

Following the ongoing Lighter DEX FUD for allegedly partnering with perceived ‘extractive’ market makers such as Jump Trading and Hayden Davis, the architect behind the Libra memecoin scandal, Hyperliquid, has jumped on the chaos.

In a statement, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan positioned the DEX as a better and “credibly neutral” option, noting that,

“Integrity has always been one of Hyperliquid’s core values. The house of all finance must be credibly neutral. This means no private investors, no market maker deals, and no protocol fees to any company.”

He took a swipe at those uncomfortable with Hyperliquid’s strict stance and added,

“This principle of fairness frustrates a few users and builders who are used to special treatment.”

Unpacking the Lighter DEX FUD

The latest Lighter FUD emerged after an analyst uncovered that five undisclosed wallets received $26 million worth of Lighter [LIT] after providing liquidity worth $5 million. The analyst noted that Jump Trading received an LIT airdrop as well as part of a market-making deal.

Kelsier Labs, the venture firm led by Hayden Davis, also received $11.52 million LIT.

Additionally, Tron founder Justin Sun was rewarded for being an early liquidity provider. However, some of these details were not disclosed early enough to the community, according to the on-chain researcher.

Following the revelations, Web3 researcher ZachXBT sarcastically blasted Lighter, stating that “crime pays.”

One of the community users criticized the opaque aidrop and said,

“This is quite bad and very blatant. Who knows how many more rogue airdrop addresses there are.”

Amid the scrutiny, the Lighter team issued a statement and disclosed that they had an early arrangement with liquid providers and market makers. Even so, some users doubted this assurance as one quipped,

“It’s funny that Vlad (Lighter founder) seems to think it’s normal to make side deals and use Lighter airdrop allocation as a settlement tool with third parties, outside the public points program.”

Hyperliquid’s dominance falls

Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s market share has dropped below 19% as rivals such as Lighter gained ground.

Hyperliquid’s dominance peaked in May at 75%. However, it has been in decline over the past few months, stabilizing between 19% and 20%.

On the price charts, HYPE was up about 2% and valued at $24.8 at press time, following Jeff Yan’s remarks. However, it was still stuck in the short-term price range of $23-$26.

Clearing the overhead resistance levels at $26 and $27 could allow further recovery if the broader market sentiment improves.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid’s founder defended his position to block market makers from the platform.
  • However, its market share has declined from 75% to 19% amid rising competition from Lighter and others.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core value that Hyperliquid's founder, Jeff Yan, emphasizes for the DEX?

AIntegrity is one of Hyperliquid's core values, with a focus on being 'credibly neutral'.

QWhy did the Lighter DEX face criticism (FUD) from the community?

ALighter DEX faced criticism for allegedly partnering with 'extractive' market makers like Jump Trading and having undisclosed airdrops, including $26 million worth of LIT tokens to five wallets that provided $5 million in liquidity.

QHow has Hyperliquid's market share changed recently, according to the article?

AHyperliquid's market share has dropped from a peak of 75% in May to below 19%, as rivals like Lighter gained ground.

QWhat did Web3 researcher ZachXBT sarcastically state about the Lighter DEX situation?

AZachXBT sarcastically blasted Lighter, stating that 'crime pays' in response to the revelations about undisclosed airdrops and market maker deals.

QWhat conditions could allow Hyperliquid's native token (HYPE) to recover further, as mentioned in the article?

AClearing the overhead resistance levels at $26 and $27 could allow further recovery for HYPE if the broader market sentiment improves.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SOON

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar SOON (SOON) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar SOON (SOON) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu SOON (SOON)Después de comprar tu SOON (SOON), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear SOON (SOON)Tradear fácilmente con SOON (SOON) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

131 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.23Actualizado en 2025.05.23

Cómo comprar SOON

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SOON (SOON).

活动图片