Hyperliquid founder blocks market makers to keep the DEX ‘credibly neutral’

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-02Actualizado a 2026-01-02

Resumen

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has positioned the DEX as a "credibly neutral" platform, emphasizing integrity and fairness by blocking market makers, private investors, and protocol fees. This stance contrasts with recent controversy around Lighter DEX, which faced criticism for undisclosed market-making deals, including airdrops to entities like Jump Trading and Kelsier Labs. While Hyperliquid's market share has dropped from 75% to 19% amid rising competition, its token HYPE saw a slight price increase following Yan's remarks. The ongoing "perpetual DEX wars highlight tensions between transparency and traditional market-making practices in decentralized exchanges.

The perpetual DEX wars aren’t slowing down anytime soon.

Following the ongoing Lighter DEX FUD for allegedly partnering with perceived ‘extractive’ market makers such as Jump Trading and Hayden Davis, the architect behind the Libra memecoin scandal, Hyperliquid, has jumped on the chaos.

In a statement, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan positioned the DEX as a better and “credibly neutral” option, noting that,

“Integrity has always been one of Hyperliquid’s core values. The house of all finance must be credibly neutral. This means no private investors, no market maker deals, and no protocol fees to any company.”

He took a swipe at those uncomfortable with Hyperliquid’s strict stance and added,

“This principle of fairness frustrates a few users and builders who are used to special treatment.”

Unpacking the Lighter DEX FUD

The latest Lighter FUD emerged after an analyst uncovered that five undisclosed wallets received $26 million worth of Lighter [LIT] after providing liquidity worth $5 million. The analyst noted that Jump Trading received an LIT airdrop as well as part of a market-making deal.

Kelsier Labs, the venture firm led by Hayden Davis, also received $11.52 million LIT.

Additionally, Tron founder Justin Sun was rewarded for being an early liquidity provider. However, some of these details were not disclosed early enough to the community, according to the on-chain researcher.

Following the revelations, Web3 researcher ZachXBT sarcastically blasted Lighter, stating that “crime pays.”

One of the community users criticized the opaque aidrop and said,

“This is quite bad and very blatant. Who knows how many more rogue airdrop addresses there are.”

Amid the scrutiny, the Lighter team issued a statement and disclosed that they had an early arrangement with liquid providers and market makers. Even so, some users doubted this assurance as one quipped,

“It’s funny that Vlad (Lighter founder) seems to think it’s normal to make side deals and use Lighter airdrop allocation as a settlement tool with third parties, outside the public points program.”

Hyperliquid’s dominance falls

Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s market share has dropped below 19% as rivals such as Lighter gained ground.

Hyperliquid’s dominance peaked in May at 75%. However, it has been in decline over the past few months, stabilizing between 19% and 20%.

On the price charts, HYPE was up about 2% and valued at $24.8 at press time, following Jeff Yan’s remarks. However, it was still stuck in the short-term price range of $23-$26.

Clearing the overhead resistance levels at $26 and $27 could allow further recovery if the broader market sentiment improves.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid’s founder defended his position to block market makers from the platform.
  • However, its market share has declined from 75% to 19% amid rising competition from Lighter and others.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core value that Hyperliquid's founder, Jeff Yan, emphasizes for the DEX?

AIntegrity is one of Hyperliquid's core values, with a focus on being 'credibly neutral'.

QWhy did the Lighter DEX face criticism (FUD) from the community?

ALighter DEX faced criticism for allegedly partnering with 'extractive' market makers like Jump Trading and having undisclosed airdrops, including $26 million worth of LIT tokens to five wallets that provided $5 million in liquidity.

QHow has Hyperliquid's market share changed recently, according to the article?

AHyperliquid's market share has dropped from a peak of 75% in May to below 19%, as rivals like Lighter gained ground.

QWhat did Web3 researcher ZachXBT sarcastically state about the Lighter DEX situation?

AZachXBT sarcastically blasted Lighter, stating that 'crime pays' in response to the revelations about undisclosed airdrops and market maker deals.

QWhat conditions could allow Hyperliquid's native token (HYPE) to recover further, as mentioned in the article?

AClearing the overhead resistance levels at $26 and $27 could allow further recovery for HYPE if the broader market sentiment improves.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SOON

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar SOON (SOON) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar SOON (SOON) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu SOON (SOON)Después de comprar tu SOON (SOON), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear SOON (SOON)Tradear fácilmente con SOON (SOON) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

175 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.23Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar SOON

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SOON (SOON).

活动图片