Hyperliquid Continues to Push into the US as HPC and tradeXYZ Sue CFTC Over Perpetual Energy Contracts

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-26Actualizado a 2026-08-26

Resumen

The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and trading platform trade[XYZ] have petitioned the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to establish a regulated market for energy sector perpetual contracts. This move aims to provide U.S. oil and gas traders with a 24/7 domestic platform for hedging risks, covering periods like nights and weekends when traditional futures markets are closed. Their joint letter, referencing assets like WTI crude and Henry Hub natural gas, argues that such instruments would have mitigated volatility during events like the February oil crisis. They emphasize perpetual contracts as a complement to, not a replacement for, traditional dated futures. The request follows the CFTC's May approval of crypto-based perpetuals and a subsequent call for comments on physically-backed commodities. HPC and trade[XYZ] outline five steps for the CFTC to implement these energy contracts, including adopting a tech-neutral framework for continuous trading, clarifying rules for non-stop markets, and recognizing stablecoins as margin. This lobbying effort aligns with Hyperliquid's U.S. expansion strategy, which has gained political attention but also faces legal challenges from established exchanges like CME.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and trading organization trade[XYZ] on Wednesday, August 26, petitioned the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to create a regulated US market for perpetual energy contracts.

If the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) grants the request, it would provide US oil and gas traders with a domestic platform for 24/7 hedging of risks related to crude oil and natural gas, including nights and weekends when traditional futures markets are closed.

Joint Letter to Oil and Gas Companies

Both groups sent a joint letter with comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) concerning perpetual contracts linked to WTI crude oil, Brent crude oil, and Henry Hub natural gas.

HPC is an independent research and advocacy organization associated with the Hyperliquid Foundation.

trade[XYZ] is a HIP-3 platform that operates markets for perpetual securities with traditional assets based on Hyperliquid technology.

The project launched in October 2025 and has reportedly processed over $500 billion in cumulative trading volume since then.

In May, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) approved the first perpetual contracts traded as futures on a US exchange.

However, the regulator limited them to crypto assets only, and in its policy statement highlighted the energy sector as an asset class requiring further study.

In June, the CFTC requested public comment on perpetuals tied to stored, physically deliverable commodities. HPC and trade[XYZ] are responding to that request, and energy is the logical next asset class for them after digital.

The February Oil Crisis is a Prime Example

The letter referenced February 28, when Middle East hostilities led to a halt in regional energy exports, and US oil futures were suspended for part of the initial shock.

While fighting continued, Brent crude oil prices neared $120 per barrel by March 9. This caused aviation fuel prices to double in a very short period. Airlines that had hedged fuel prices weathered the crisis, while those without sufficient reserves suffered losses.

Perpetual contract trading tied to oil prices on Hyperliquid continued even during the exchange window closure.

HPC and trade[XYZ] stated that about two-thirds of the price change between Friday's market close and Sunday's underlying index reopening had already occurred on the blockchain before traditional trading venues reopened.

Why a Perpetual Contract Can Track Price

A perpetual contract has no settlement date. Instead, a regular funding payment pushes its price towards the price of the asset it references.

HPC and trade[XYZ] said they do not advocate for eliminating fixed-date futures, which are still suitable for traders needing delivery in a specific month or physical settlement.

The groups stated that standard WTI crude oil futures move in lots of 1,000 barrels, which is about $70,000 in notional value at current prices. The median price for the over-the-counter oil [XYZ] market is about $1,300.

HPC also references its research "Perpetual Futures as a Complement to Fixed-Date Futures," which found that in nearly 75% of analyzed weekend market closures, the price of the perpetual oil future was closer to Sunday's opening price than to Friday's closing price.

What Did HPC and trade[XYZ] Ask the CFTC to Do?

In their comment letter, the authors asked the CFTC to take five steps to implement perpetual energy contracts on regulated US markets. They stated the CFTC could do this without needing new legislation.

The first item on the list is implementing a technology-neutral system for 24/7 trading.
The second step suggested by HPC and trade[XYZ] is for the agency to confirm that exchanges and clearinghouses can operate continuously under existing core principles.
The third step proposes that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) clarify what a "business day" means for markets that never close.
The fourth step is for the agency to recognize stablecoins and tokenized collateral as acceptable margin.
Finally, they asked the regulator to confirm that regulated venues can use blockchain for clearing and settlement, respectively.

Expansion of Hyperliquid's US Market Entry Strategy

A few days earlier, HPC urged the SEC and CFTC to harmonize the classification of perpetuals based on economic structure, not the underlying asset.

The lobbying is political, as President Trump stated that CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is working to bring Hyperliquid to market "in full compliance with the law and within the legislation."

Hype increased 40% following President Trump's statement.

However, not everyone agrees with this development, as in June, CME sued the CFTC over its decision to permit perpetual futures. Exchanges including CME and ICE stated that Hyperliquid should register with the agency.

According to CoinMarketCap data, HYPE traded around $82.12 on Wednesday .

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are HPC and trade[XYZ] requesting the CFTC to do regarding perpertual contracts?

AHPC and trade[XYZ] have requested the CFTC to create a regulated U.S. market for perpetual contracts on energy commodities. They submitted a joint comment letter asking the CFTC to take five steps to implement U.S.-regulated energy perpetual contracts without needing new legislation.

QAccording to HPC and trade[XYZ], what major advantage would regulated energy perpetual contracts offer to U.S. oil and gas traders?

ARegulated energy perpetual contracts would provide U.S. oil and gas traders with a domestic platform for 24/7 hedging of risks associated with crude oil and natural gas, including nights and weekends when traditional futures markets are closed.

QWhy do HPC and trade[XYZ] cite the February oil crisis as an example?

AThey cite the February crisis, triggered by Middle East hostilities, as an example where traditional U.S. oil futures trading was suspended, causing significant price volatility. During this period, perpetual oil contracts on Hyperliquid continued trading, with about two-thirds of the weekend price move occurring on the blockchain before traditional markets reopened.

QHow do perpetual contracts differ from standard futures contracts?

APerpetual contracts have no expiration or settlement date. Instead, a regular funding payment mechanism pushes their price toward the price of the underlying referenced asset. Standard futures have fixed expiration dates and are suitable for traders needing delivery or physical settlement in a specific month.

QWhat is the political context mentioned for Hyperliquid's push into the U.S. market?

AThe lobbying effort has political significance as President Trump stated that CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is working to bring Hyperliquid to the market 'in full compliance with the law and within the statute.' However, not all agree; exchanges like CME and ICE have sued the CFTC over its decision to approve perpetual futures and argue Hyperliquid should register with the agency.

Lecturas Relacionadas

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

Russia's Ministry of Digital Development has proposed a plan for launching 5G networks. It allows the "Big Four" mobile operators (Beeline, Megafon, MTS, T2) to deploy 5G on existing 4G/LTE base stations and frequencies, and will allocate them the new 4.63–4.99 GHz band. A key element is "technological neutrality," permitting the use of foreign equipment until September 2026. The new 4.63–4.99 GHz band is intended for more advanced services and industrial applications. However, a phased transition to Russian-made base stations will begin in 2027, with a target of at least 50% domestic equipment by 2030. The rollout timeline aims for 5G in cities with over 1 million people by the end of 2027, expanding to 84 cities by 2035. Initial "5G Ready" service, operating over existing infrastructure, will offer minimal speed improvements. Significant speed gains (4-10x over LTE) will require the new band and corresponding equipment. The plan addresses long-standing regulatory delays, including the military's hold on the global standard 3.4–3.8 GHz band. This forced Russia to adopt the 4.63–4.99 GHz range, overlapping with a Chinese band, making Chinese equipment a potential transitional solution. The success of the rollout will depend on equipment supply and the pace of production localization, while a challenge lies in smartphone compatibility with this non-standard frequency band.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas warns that the growing adoption of tokenized deposits in the banking sector could pose unforeseen risks to the financial system. Tokenized deposits, which transfer traditional bank deposits to blockchain infrastructure, offer features like instant settlement and programmable payments. While issued by regulated banks and maintaining deposit characteristics, they could enable customers to move funds between banks much faster in search of higher yields. This would significantly weaken banks' liquidity management and lending capacity. The Fed's analysis estimates that an increase in deposit interest rate sensitivity by 10% could reduce the interest rate risk banks can bear by approximately $700 billion over ten years. Similarly, a 10% shortening of the average deposit maturity could reduce the banking system's capacity to convert deposits into loans by about $580 billion. This acceleration of deposit movement could force banks to rely on more expensive wholesale funding, increasing borrowing costs for consumers and businesses and potentially making traditional banks resemble non-bank financial institutions. While the report does not directly address Bitcoin, the described shifts could have long-term implications. Firstly, the tokenization of deposits by banks could promote institutional adoption of blockchain-based financial infrastructure, indirectly legitimizing digital asset classes like Bitcoin. Secondly, faster-moving deposits and resulting higher funding costs could increase the price of liquidity in the financial system. This could create near-term headwinds for risk assets, including Bitcoin, due to tighter financial conditions and potential selling pressure. The report concludes that widespread adoption of this technology could impact many areas, from payment systems to monetary policy transmission mechanisms.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin ETF Assets Approach $100 Billion as Price Drops Below $80,000

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw their seventh consecutive day of net inflows, adding $314.37 million. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) captured the vast majority, attracting $284.42 million, while four other funds shared $29.95 million. Total assets under management for these ETFs neared $100 billion, reaching $99.05 billion. Meanwhile, spot Ethereum ETFs also continued their streak, attracting $179.80 million, with BlackRock's ETHA leading at $146.44 million. Inflows were also recorded for Solana, XRP, and other crypto ETFs. Despite this sustained institutional demand, Bitcoin's price briefly surpassed $80,000 before falling to around $78,447, and Ethereum traded near $2,462. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index dipped but remained in "Greed" territory.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin ETF Assets Approach $100 Billion as Price Drops Below $80,000

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Decrease in XRP Ledger Transaction Count Coincides with a 521% Increase in Volume

The volume of payments on the XRP Ledger has surged by 521.1%, coinciding with a broader improvement in the cryptocurrency sector. Currently, the payment volume stands at 488.4 million XRP. However, it's crucial to note that while payment volume spiked, the number of payment transactions actually decreased by 10.5% to 388,900. This divergence indicates a significant increase in the average transaction size, suggesting activity from larger holders. Other metrics confirm increased activity: new accounts grew by 5.3% to around 1,800, and active users surged by 179.7% to approximately 485,700. Transaction fees in XRP increased by 16.1%, though the number of active accounts slightly decreased by 0.7% to 11,300. Regarding price, the XRP token is holding above the long-term moving average near $1.35. Consolidation above this level could help maintain the breakout structure. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) briefly rose above 80 before retreating to 70.5. While the 521% volume increase is notable, it does not equate to a sixfold rise in network usage. The pattern of fewer but larger transactions points to significant movement by major holders.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Decrease in XRP Ledger Transaction Count Coincides with a 521% Increase in Volume

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Blockchain Could Deprive U.S. Banks of $700 Billion in Lending Potential

The adoption of blockchain technology and tokenized deposits by traditional banks poses a significant threat to their lending capacity, potentially costing the U.S. financial system hundreds of billions of dollars in lost liquidity. A Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report from August 2026 warns that this shift could fundamentally undermine the core banking model of maturity transformation, where banks use short-term deposits to fund long-term loans like mortgages. Tokenization increases depositors' rate sensitivity and enables instant, 24/7 fund transfers, which could lead to faster capital flight. The report estimates that a 10% increase in rate sensitivity could reduce U.S. banks' lending potential by $700 billion, while a 10% faster deposit outflow could drain another $580 billion. This forces banks to hold more low-yield, high-quality liquid assets (like cash reserves and U.S. Treasuries) to manage instant withdrawal risks, thereby diverting funds away from lending to businesses and households. The conclusion is that replicating crypto benefits such as speed and programmability without altering centralized banking's fundamental structure creates systemic contradictions, giving customers a crypto-like experience while depriving banks of their primary profit mechanism based on locking in customer funds.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Blockchain Could Deprive U.S. Banks of $700 Billion in Lending Potential

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot