Hyperliquid becomes ‘most liquid venue for crypto price discovery’- What does it mean?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-27Actualizado a 2026-01-27

Resumen

Hyperliquid has achieved significant traction, becoming a leading venue for crypto price discovery with deeper liquidity than Binance, according to its founder. The platform has seen over $1 billion in trading volume for its equity perpetuals and near-record open interest of $800 billion. Its native token, HYPE, surged 24% to $28, though it faces a key resistance level. Analysts suggest the recovery is supported by eased selling pressure from monthly unlocks and whales, as well as substantial accumulation by top buyers. However, sustained price growth depends on increased platform revenue driving token buybacks.

Hyperliquid has recorded remarkable traction in equity and crypto perpetuals (perps). Perps are contracts that allow traders to speculate on price movements without a fixed maturity.

The recently deployed equity perps (HIP-3), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage, have crossed $1 billion in trading volume.

Additionally, the daily Open Interest (OI) was nearing a record high of $800 billion. This further underscored strong demand despite an overall lull in the crypto market.

On Bitcoin perps, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan said,

“Hyperliquid has quietly achieved an important milestone of becoming the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.”

He cited the platform’s liquidity depth, which showed thicker order books than Binance. But will this boost the native token’s recovery?

Will HYPE extend its 24% recovery?

Following the update on the massive traction, HYPE posted a 24% jump in the past 24 hours. It rose from $22 to $28. But it also reached an overhead hurdle that may derail further recovery if bulls fail to clear it.

The $28 price area (red zone) has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December and may block bulls again if momentum falters at the level. If they clear it and top $30, then a clear run to $35 may be feasible.

What could drive HYPE’s recovery?

Overall, HYPE was still down 52% from its record high of $59 hit in September 2025. But according to analyst Ericonomic, some of the bearish catalysts that drove the downtrend have significantly eased.

The feared monthly unlocks (9.92 million HYPE), for example, saw only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months. For Ericonometric, this was a ‘trickle’ rather than a ‘cliff’ that was priced in during the late 2025 dump.

The only problem, the analyst added, was that Hyperliquid Strategies was accumulating these team unlocks. This could limit the treasury firm’s ability to buy more HYPE off the spot market directly.

Besides, several whales, including Fasanara Capital, Tornado Cash player, and Continue Capital, have been persistent sellers, but the pressure had eased, the analyst noted.

The top 10 buyers had accumulated nearly $200 million in HYPE in the past 30 days, further helping stabilize prices above $20.

Finally, a significant portion of long leveraged positions have been wiped out and have presented a structural setup for a bullish recovery. However, the platform’s revenue was still muted despite growing traction.

For a sustained price recovery to be possible, Hyperliquid’s revenue neeeds to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.

Final Thoughts

Hyperliquid’s founder said the platform now rivals Binance as the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery.
Analysts believe HYPE’s recovery was likely amid overblown monthly unlock fears and easing selling pressure from whales.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat milestone did Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan claim the platform has achieved?

AHyperliquid has become the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.

QWhat type of contracts, specifically mentioned in the article, have seen over $1 billion in trading volume on Hyperliquid?

AEquity perpetuals (perps), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage.

QWhat was the key overhead price hurdle for the HYPE token that could block further recovery?

AThe $28 price area, which has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December.

QAccording to analyst Ericonometric, what was the feared monthly token unlocks actually like, and how much was sold?

AThe unlocks were a 'trickle' rather than a 'cliff,' with only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months.

QWhat does the article state is necessary for a sustained price recovery of the HYPE token?

AHyperliquid's revenue needs to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHace 1 min(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHace 1 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros