Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight NewsPublicado a 2026-06-09Actualizado a 2026-06-09

Resumen

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto....


Author: ChandlerZ, Foresight News


On June 9, according to on-chain analyst Specter's monitoring, wallets that have interacted with the digital identity project Humanity are under sustained attack. Hundreds of addresses holding H tokens have been compromised so far, with total losses exceeding $31 million. Approximately $9 million has been swapped for ETH, with another $9.9 million still held in the form of H tokens.



Humanity founder Terence Kwok subsequently confirmed the security incident, involving the leakage of a private key belonging to a foundation member. As a precaution, he advised users to temporarily refrain from interacting with the Humanity cross-chain bridge or any liquidity pools until further safety confirmation. The team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation and will continue to update the community on the progress.



The price of the H token plummeted from around 0.7 USDT to a low of 0.052 USDT, a drop of over 90% within 24 hours. At the time of writing, H is trading at 0.1368301 USDT, with its market capitalization falling from around $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million.


As of 11:00 AM on June 9, the attacker is suspected of minting 100 million new Humanity Protocol H tokens and is currently selling them off for BNB.




A Project That Never Truly 'Proved Humanity'


Humanity Protocol was founded in 2024, positioning itself as a decentralized digital identity network. Its core selling point was using palm print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs to verify whether a user is a real human. Built on Polygon CDK (zkEVM), the project claimed to solve issues like Sybil attacks, fake accounts, and AI-generated identities without exposing personal information.


This narrative attracted significant capital attention in 2024. Humanity Protocol completed two rounds of funding totaling $50 million. A $30 million seed round at a $1 billion valuation included investors like Kingsway Capital, Animoca Brands, Blockchain.com, and Shima Capital. In January 2025, another $20 million round led by Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto raised the valuation to $1.1 billion.


The Humanity Foundation also assembled numerous well-known figures, led by Animoca Brands Chairman Yat Siu. Co-founders included Mario Nawfal, founder of the international blockchain consulting firm, and Yeewai Chong, a senior investment expert from Morgan Stanley and Ortus Capital.


On June 25, 2025, the H token launched via a Fairdrop mechanism, touted as the first-ever token distribution in Web3 history exclusively to verified humans. However, two days after launch, DL News reported leaked conversations from the founder. In the dialogue, Kwok admitted that out of the 9 million Human IDs created on the network, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, implying that up to 88% of users might be bots.


Furthermore, according to revelations from X platform users SCoin (@ LianFang _) and AB Kuai . Dong (@_FOR AB ), Humanity Protocol (H) might be a "repackaged domestic project," with APP code material libraries still containing images from Shenzhen access control manufacturer Zhangteng Information, raising doubts about its authenticity. Netizens claimed much of its social media hype was self-generated by project-side accounts, with actual user participation questionable.



AB Kuai.Dong stated that those who previously completed verification with Humanity should be cautious. Zhangteng Information is allegedly backed by a Shanghai-based outsourcing company specializing in full identity recognition outsourcing. Additionally, whistleblower SCoin claimed the project collected large amounts of users' palm print data, raising privacy and security concerns.


This was fatal for a project whose core value proposition was "proving humanity." The H token fell over 61% within two days of launch, from around $0.05 to a low of $0.018.


The Founder's Previous Unicorn Burned Through $170 Million


Terence Kwok's personal resume added a footnote of risk to the project. In 2012, 20-year-old Terence Kwok dropped out of the University of Chicago and, inspired by a $900 roaming bill received during a trip, founded Tink Labs. The company provided free smartphones (branded Handy) to hotel rooms for guests to use abroad, replacing expensive roaming fees. This concept once captivated the capital market. Tink Labs raised $170 million successively from Foxconn, SoftBank, Innovation Works, and the founder of Meitu, reaching a valuation of $1.5 billion and becoming Hong Kong's first unicorn. At its peak, Handy devices covered 600,000 hotel rooms across 82 countries.


However, Kwok's aggressive expansion strategy soon met reality. Global roaming fees continued to decline, hotels were unwilling to pay for Handy devices, and the company began losing money from 2017. According to the Financial Times, SoftBank cut off funding for a key project after discovering that Tink Labs might have diverted funds from its Japanese joint venture to other loss-making markets. In July 2019, over 100 employees from its European, Middle Eastern, and African offices did not receive their salaries. Laid-off employees smeared cake on the walls and floors as they left the Oxford office. On August 1, Tink Labs officially shut down, entering bankruptcy proceedings in January 2020. A former HR director told the FT that Kwok only cared about "making money," and the entire $170 million investment evaporated.


Six years later, Kwok returned to the market with Humanity Protocol, once again securing a unicorn valuation from Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto.


Private Key Management: An Old Problem, a New Cost


Based on current information, this attack does not involve smart contract vulnerabilities or protocol-level security flaws. The attacker obtained a private key belonging to a foundation member, representing a failure in the most traditional security management.


The security landscape for the crypto industry in 2026 was already severe. According to CCN statistics, losses from DeFi hacks in the first four months of 2026 exceeded $1 billion, with most stolen funds still unrecovered. The $286 million attack on Drift Protocol on April 1 was the largest single incident of the year. Attackers are increasingly targeting validators, RPC nodes, and governance systems, not just smart contract vulnerabilities. However, private key leaks remain one of the most devastating attack types because they bypass all on-chain security mechanisms, directly granting control of assets.


For a project already burdened with the controversy of 88% bot users and a token down over 90% from its peak, a $31 million private key leak could be the final blow to trust. As of the time of writing, Kwok stated in his declaration that the team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation but did not mention any user compensation plan or explain why the foundation member's private key lacked basic protections like multi-signature or hardware isolation.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total estimated loss in the Humanity Protocol security incident, and what were the main assets stolen?

AThe total estimated loss exceeded $31 million. Approximately $9 million was converted to ETH, and about $9.9 million remained in the form of H tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the specific cause of the Humanity Protocol security breach?

AThe security breach was caused by the private key of a foundation member being compromised.

QWhat was a major controversy regarding Humanity Protocol's user verification process that was reported before the hack?

AA leaked conversation revealed that out of 9 million created Human IDs, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, suggesting around 88% of users might be bots.

QWhat previous venture of Humanity Protocol's founder, Terence Kwok, failed after burning through $170 million in funding?

ATerence Kwok's previous venture was Tink Labs (branded Handy), which provided free smartphones to hotel rooms and failed after reportedly burning through $170 million in funding.

QHow did the article characterize the nature of the attack on Humanity Protocol in relation to common DeFi security failures?

AThe article characterized the attack not as a smart contract vulnerability, but as a traditional security management failure involving private key compromise, bypassing all on-chain security mechanisms.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片